Physics Learning using Inquiry-Student Team Achievement Division (ISTAD) and Guided Inquiry Models Viewed by Students Achievement Motivation

S. H. Sulistijo, S. Sukarmin, W. Sunarno

Abstract

This study aims to determine the differences in learning outcomes of between students that are given the Physics learning models of Inquiry-Student Team Achievement Division (ISTAD) and guided inquiry, between students who have high achievement motivation and low achievement motivation. This study was an experimental study with a 2x2x2 factorial design. The study population was the students of class X of SMAN 1 Toroh Grobogan of academic year 2016/2017. Samples were obtained by cluster random sampling technique consists of two classes, class X IPA 3 is used as an experimental class using ISTAD model and class X IPA 4 as the control class using guided inquiry model. Data collection techniques using test techniques for learning outcomes, and technical questionnaire to obtain the data of students' achievement motivation. Analysis of data using two-way ANOVA. The results showed that: (1) there is a difference between the learning outcomes of students with the ISTAD Physics models and with the physics model of guided inquiry. (2) There are differences in learning outcomes between students who have high achievement motivation and low achievement motivation. (3) There is no interaction between ISTAD and guided inquiry Physics models learning and achievement motivation of students.

Keywords

This study aims to determine the differences in learning outcomes of between students that are given the Physics learning models of Inquiry-Student Team Achievement Division (ISTAD) and guided inquiry, between students who have high achievement motivation

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abdelraheem, A., & Asan, A. (2006). The effectiveness of inquiry-based technology enhanced collaborative learning environment. International journal of technology in teaching and learning, 2(2), 65-87.

Abdullah, S., & Shariff, A. (2008). The effects of inquiry-based computer simulation with cooperative learning on scientific thinking and conceptual understanding of gas laws. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 4(4), 387-398.

Banchi, H.,&Bell, R. (2008). The Many Levels of Inquiry.Science and Children, 46(2): 26-29.

Bilgin, I. (2009). The Effects of Guided Inquiry Instruction Incorporating A Cooperative Learning Approach on University Students Achievement of Acid and Bases Concepts and Attitude toward Guided Inquiry Instruction.Scientific Research and Essay, 4(10): 1039-1046.

Djamarah, Syaiful Bahri. (2003). Psikologi Belajar. Jakarta:Rineka Cipta.

Erina, R., & Kuswanto, H. (2015). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Instad terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Hasil Belajar Kognitif Fisika Di SMA. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 1(2), 202-211.

Fitriani, N. R., Widiyatmoko, A., & Khusniati, M.(2016). The effectiveness of CTL model guided inquiry-based in the topic of chemicals in daily life to improve students learning outcomes and activeness. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia,5 (2): 278-283.

Iswandari, R., Probosari, R. M., & Sugiharto, B. (2013). Studi komparasi instad dipadu peta konsep dengan pembelajaran konvensional terhadap keterampilan proses sains dan hasil belajar biologi siswa kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Sukoharjo Tahun Pelajaran 2012/2013. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Sains, 2(2):147-157.

Kordaki, M., Daradoumis, T., Fragidakis, D., & Grigoriadou, M. (2012). Adapting the Collaborative Strategy Students Team Achievement Divisions in an Information Technology Work Place. In Intelligent Adaptation and Personalization Techniques in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, (pp. 131-153).

Lindgren, H. C., & Ferraro, V. (1976). Educational psychology in the classroom. New York: Wiley.

McBride, J. W., Bhatti, M. I., Hannan, M. A., & Feinberg, M. (2004). Using an inquiry approach to teach science to secondary school science teachers. Physics education, 39(5): 434.

McClelland, D.C. (1987). Human Motivation. New York: The Press Syndicate of The University of Chambridge.

Nurhidayati, S., Zubaidah, S., & Indriwati, S.E. (2015). Pengaruh Metode STAD Dipadu Inkuiri Terbimbing Terhadap Aktivitas dan Hasil Belajar Biologi Peserta didik. Jurnal Pendidikan, 14 (1): 73-81.

Prayitno, B. A. (2010). Potensi Pembelajaran Biologi Inkuiri Dipadu Kooperatif Dalam Pemberdayaan Berpikir dan Keterampilan Proses Pada Peserta didik Under Achievment. Proceeding Seminar Sains dengan tema Optimalisasi Sains Untuk Memberdayakan Manusia. Surabaya, 16 Januari 2010.

Setiawan, B., Sunarti, T., & Astriani, D. (2016). The Application Of Inquiry Learning Model To Improve satuatap Students Learning Results At SMPN 4 Singosari Malang. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5 (1): 45-50.

Subekti, Y., & Ariswan, A. (2016). Pembelajaran Fisika dengan Metode Eksperimen untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Kognitif dan Keterampilan Proses Sains.Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 2 (2): 252-261

Sugiarti, P. (2005). Penerapan Teori Multiple Intellegence dalam Pembelajaran Fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan Penabur, 4(5): 29-42.

Sugiyanto. (2009). Kontribusi Motivasi Berprestasi Terhadap Prestasi Akademik Peserta didik Kelas XI SMA Negeri 10 Semarang.Paradigma, 4 (8): 19-34.

Sujarwo.(2011). Pengaruh Strategi Pembelajaran Guided inquiry Dan Ekspositori Terhadap Hasil Belajar Sosiologi Pada Peserta didik SMA Yang Memiliki Tingkat Motivasi Berprestasi Dan Kreativitas Berbeda. Disertasi tidak dipublikasikan. Malang:UniversitasNegeri Malang.

Sukimarwati, J., Sunarno, W., & Sugiyarto. (2013). Pembelajaran Biologi dengan Model Guided Inquiry Menggunakan LKS terbimbing dan LKS Bebas Termodifikasi Ditinjau dari Kreatifitas dan Motivasi Berprestasi Peserta Didik. Jurnal Inkuiri, 2 (2): 154-162.

Tiangtong, M., & Teemuangsai, S. (2013). Student team achievement divisions (stad) technique through the moodle to enhance learning achievement.published by canadian center of science and education. International Education Studies,6(4): 85-92.

Vlassi, M., &Karaliota, A. (2012).The comparison between guided inquiry and traditional teaching methode.a case study for the teaching of the structure of matter to 8th grade greekstudents. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,(pp.494-497).

Wiratama, D. I., & Pramukantoro, J. A. (2014). Perbedaan Model Pembelajaran Guided Inquiry Dan MPL Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa Yang Memiliki Motivasi Berprestasi Berbeda Pada Mata Pelajaran Teknik Listrik di Kelas X SMK Negeri 1 Jetis Mojokerto. Jurnal Mahasiswa Teknologi Pendidikan, 3(1): 179-185

Yager, R.E.,&Akcay, H. (2010). The Advantages of an Inquiry Approach for Science Instruction in Middle Grades. Journal ofSchool Science and mathematic, 110 (1):5-12.

Yunus, S. R., Sanjaya, I. G. M., & Jatmiko, B. (2013). Implementasi pembelajaran fisika berbasis guided inquiry untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa auditorik. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 2 (1): 48-52.

Zeidan, H.A., & Jayosi, R.M. (2015). Science process skills and attitudes toward science among palestinian secondary school students. World Journal of Education,5 (1): 13-24.

Zubaidillah, M. M., Kirana, K., & Poedjiastoeti, S. (2016). Development of stad cooperative based learning set assisted with animation media to enhanche studentslearning outcome in an islamic junior high school. Jurnal Pendidikan Ipa Indonesia, 5(2): 247-255.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.