Effectiveness of POGIL with SSI Context on Vocational High School Students’ Chemistry Learning Motivation

I. B. Yuliastini, S. Rahayu, F. Fajaroh, N. Mansour

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the difference of Vocational High School students’ learning motivation after they were taught the topic of the electrolyte solution and redox reaction using POGIL model with SSI context, POGIL, and conventional learning. The research design used was quasi-experiment with the model of pre-test and post-test control group design. The research subjects were three classes with the similar initial ability. The data were obtained using SMTSL motivation questionnaire (r = 0.824) and analyzed using ANCOVA. The research results showed a significant difference in learning motivation between students taught using POGIL with SSI context, POGIL, and conventional learning. The students who were taught using POGIL with SSI context had the highest learning motivation compared to those taught using POGIL and conventional learning.

Keywords

POGIL, SSI, learning motivation

Full Text:

PDF

References

Aikenhead, G.S. (2003). Chemistry and Phisics Instruction: Integration, Ideologies, and Choises. Chemical Education: Research and Practice, 4(2), 115-130.

Bereby-Meyer, Y., Kaplan, A. (2005).Motivational Influences on Transfer of Problem-Solving Strategies.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(1), 1-22.

Bilgin, M. (2009).The Effect of Guided Inquiry Instruction Incorporating a Cooperative Learning Approach on University Student’ Achievement of Acid and Base Concept and Attitude Toward Guided Inquiry Instruction.Academic Journal Scientific Research and Essay, 4(10), 1038-1046.

Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., Cocking, R.R., Donovan, M.S., Bransford & Pellegrino, J.W. (Eds). (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School: Expanded Edition. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press.

Chang, R. & Overby, J. (2011).General Chemistry The Essential Concepts Sixth Edition. New York: Mc. Graw-Hill.

Creswell, J.E. (2012).Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research, Fourth Edition. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.

Garnett, P.J., Treagust, D.F. (1992). Conceptual Difficulties Experienced by Senior High School Students of Electrochemistry: Electrochemical (Galvanic) and Electrolytic Cells. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(10), 1079-1099.

Geiger, M. (2010). Implementing POGIL in Allied Health Chemistry Courses: Insight from Process Education.International Journal of Process Education, 2(2), 19-34.

Hanson, D.M. (2005).Designing Process-Oriented Guided-Inquiry Activities. Listle, IL: Pacific Crest.

Hanson, D.M. (2006). Instructor’s Guide to Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning. Listle, IL: Pacific Crest.

Holbrook, J. (2005). Making Chemistry Teaching Relevant, 6 (1), 1-12.

Koulougliotis, D. & Salta, K. (2012).Student’s Motivation to Learn Chemistry: The Greek Case. New Perspectives in Education. Greece: Technologycal Educational Institute (TEI) of Ionian Island.

Maulidiawati, S. (2014). The Effectivity of Cooperative with POGIL Instruction on Learning Achievement.Journal Unnes: Chemistry in Education, 3(2), 163-169.

Moog, R.S., & Spencer, J.N. (2008).POGIL: An Overview. Washington DC: Oxford University Press.

Moog, R.S., Creegan, F.J., Hanson, D.M., Spencer, J.N., Straumanis, A.R. (2009). Process-Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning: POGIL and the POGIL Project.(Online), (http://www.pogil.org), accessed on 16 July 2015.

Oloruntegbe, K.O. & Alake, E.M. (2010). Chemistry for Today and The Future: Sustainability Through Virile Problem Based Chemistry Curriculum. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Science, 4(5), 800-807.

Price, W.S & Hill, J.O. (2004).Raising Status of Chemistry Education. University chemistry education, 8, 13-20.

Rahayu, S.(2015).Evaluating the affective dimension in chemistry education, in Affective Dimensions in Chemistry Education. In Murat Kahveci & Marykay Orgill (Eds). Affective Dimensions in Chemistry Education.Nederland: Springer, pp. 29–49.

Rahayu, S. (2016). Improving Indonesian Children Scientific Literacy through Nature of Science (NOS) Oriented Instruction. Book of InnauguralSpeech of Mathematics & Science Presented, Presented at open session Senate of Universitas Negeri Malang. Malang, 17 March 2016.

Rahayu, S. (2016). Improving Student’s Higher Order Thinking Skill through Chemistry Instruction with Socioscientific Issues (SSI) and Nature of Science (NOS). Proceding of National Seminar in Chemistry and Its Instruction. Malang:Chemistry Departement Universitas Negeri Malang, pp. 11-19.

Rannikmae, M &Holbrook, J. (2009).The Meaning of Scientific Literacy.International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4(3), 275-288.

Ratcliffe, M. & Grace, M. (2003).Science Education for Citizenship: Teaching Socio-Scientific Issues. Philadelphia: Open University Press.

Refriwati. (2015). Improvement Students’ Learning Motivation using Problem–Based Learning Approach on Chemistry Topic of TSM Grade 11 SMKN 1 Bukit Sundi Kabupaten Solok.Jurnal Educatio, Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 1(1), 36-42.

Sen, S. & Yilmas, A. (2015). The Effects of Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning Environment on Students’ Self-regulated Learning Skills. Problem in Education of 21th Century, 66, 54-66.

Sevinc, B., Ozmen, H., & Yigit, N. (2011). Investigation of Primary Students’ Motivation Levels towards Science Learning. Science Education International, 22(3), 218-232.

Sitepu, C.P.K. (2016).The Effect of Chemsketh Media in Instruction used Recitation Method on Chemistry Achievement and Motivation at Vocational School Grade XI. Scientific Journal “Integritasâ€, 2(1), 1-19.

Soudani, M., Sivade, A., Cros, D., & Medimagh, M. S. (2000). Transferring Knowledge from the Classroom to the Real World: Redox Concepts. School Science Review, 82(298), 65-72.

Straumanis, A. (2010).Classroom Implementation of Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning. A practical guide for instructors. Stony Brook University: Pacifi’c Crest.

Tuan, H., Chin,C., Shieh, S.H. (2005). The Development of a Questionnaire to Measure Students’ Motivation Towards Science Learning. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6), 639-654.

Widyaningsih, S.Y., Haryono, Saputro, S. (2012). Model of MFI and POGIL Viewed from Learning Activities and Student Creativity to Learning Achievement. InquiriJournal, 1(3), 266-275.

Woolfolk,A. (2010). Educational Psychology 11thEd. USA: Pearson Education, Inc.

Yalcinkaya, E., Boz, Y., Baker, O.E. (2012). Is case-based instruction effective in enchanging high school students’ motivation toward chemistry? Science Education International, 23(2), 102-116.

Zeidler, D.L., Nichols, B.H. (2009). Socioscientific Issues: Theory and Practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 49-58.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i1.9928

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share