Kartel Politik dan Korupsi Politik di Indonesia

Yeni Sri Lestari

Abstract


Sistem reformasi di Indonesia telah menyuburkan demokratisasi dalam sistem pemerintahan. Namun, praktik korupsi politik juga semakin marak terjadi di kalangan elit politik. sistem politik multipartai yang membentuk partai kartel adalah salah satu faktor yang meningkatkan terjadinya korupsi politik ini. Partai kartel menciptakan sistem kerja sama yang mampu menjaga dan mengatur negara sesuai dengan kepentingan kelompoknya, terutama dalam mencari sumber pendanaan yang berasal dari keuangan negara. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hubungan antara praktik partai kartel dengan kekalnya korupsi politik di Indonesia. Peran partai kartel terhadap terjadinya korupsi politik menjadi subjek utama artikel ini. Untuk memenuhi tujuan penulisan dalam artikel ini, maka contoh skandal kasus Bank Century yang melibatkan banyak elit politik akan dikaji dan dianalisis lebih mendalam. Metode kualitatif digunakan dalam kajian ini yang diperoleh melalui kajian literatur. Kajian ini menemukan bahwa sistem partai kartel telah memberikan keleluasaan bagi wujudnya korupsi politik, menghilangkan sistem checks and balances, matinya suara kebebasan, dan membawa harapan palsu kepada sistem demokrasi mapan sebuah pemerintahan negara.

System reform in Indonesia has fostered democratization of the government system. However, the practice of political corruption too often happens in the political elite. multi-party political system forming a cartel party is one of the factors that increase the incidence of this political corruption. Creating a cartel party cooperation system capable of maintaining and managing the state in accordance with the interests of the group, especially in seeking sources of funding from state finances. This article aims to determine the relationship between the practice of the cartel and its eternal party political corruption in Indonesia. The role of the cartel party against political corruption became the main subject of this article. To fulfill the purpose of writing this article, the example case of Bank Century scandal involving many political elite will be reviewed and analyzed more deeply. Qualitative methods used in this study were obtained through a review of the literature. This study found that the cartel party system already provides flexibility for his form of political corruption, eliminate the system of checks and balances, the demise of the voice of freedom, and bringing false hope to the democratic system established a state government.


Keywords


Indonesia; Party Cartel; Political Corruption

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anon. 2009. Perang terbuka Sri Mulyani vs Ical: dosa-dosa Bakrie dimata SM. http://nusantaranews.wordpress.com/2009/12/10/perang-terbuka-sri-mulyani-vs-ical-dosa-dosa-bakrie-dimata-sm/ [Diakses pada 20 Disember 2014].

Bambang Soesatyo. 2013. Skandal bank century di tikungan terakhir pemerintahan SBY-Boediono. Jakarta: PT. Prima Ufuk Semesta.

Bratsis, Peter. 2013. Corruption compared to what? Greece, capitalist interest, and the specular purity of the state. The Hellenic observatory and The European Intitute. London School of Economics and Political Science.

Hudzaifah & Rahmani. 2012. Politik kartel di Indonesia, suatu tinjauan pendahuluan. http://paturahman.com/2012/08/politik-kartel-di-indonesia-suatu.html [Diakses pada 5 November 2014].

Katz, Richard S. & Peter Mair. 1995. Changing models of party organization and party democracy: the emergence of the cartel party. Sage Publications. Party Politics Volume, 1, Number 1, pp 5-28.

Katz, Richard S. 2001. The Problem of Candidate Selection and Models of Party Democracy. In Party Politics Journal, 7 (3): 277-96.

Katz, Richard S. & Peter Mair. 2002. The Ascendancy of the Party in Public Office: Party Organizational Change in Twentieth-Century Democracy. In R. Gunther, J. Ramon-Montero. J. J. Linz (eds). Political Parties, Old Concepts and New Challenges (pp: 113-35). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Katz, Richard S. & Peter Mair. 2009. The cartel party thesis: A restatement. Articles Volume 7 Number 4: 753-766.

Kuskridho Ambardi. 2008. The making of the Indonesian multyparty system: A cartelized party system and its origin. The Ohio State University: dissertation.

Kuskridho Ambardi. 2009. Mengungkap politik kartel: studi tentang sistem kepartaian di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia (KPG).

Kuskridho Ambardi. 2011. Meninjau ulang konsep dan gejala kartelisasi partai di Indonesia. Diskusi melawan politik kartel. Jakarta: 27 Oktober.

Kuskridho Ambardi. 2013. Kompetisi dan kartelisasi: akar masalah dan pencegahannya. Diskusi KPK “sistem politik berintegrasi. 11-12 September.

Majeed, Rushda. 2012. Menerapkan aturan dan akuntabilitas: standar operasional prosedur di kementerian keuangan republik Indonesia, 2006-2007. Princeton University: Innovations for successful societies. http://www.princeton.edu/successfulsocieties [Diakses pada 20 Disember 2014].

Slater, Dan. 2004. Indonesia’s accountability trap: party cartels and presidential power after democratic transition. Research library No. 78: 61.

Slater, Dan. 2006. The ironies of instability in Indonesia. Berghahn Journal Volume 50, issue 1: 208-213.

Slater, Daniel and Erika Simmons. 2013. Coping by Colluding: Political Uncertainty and Promiscuous Powersharing in Indonesian and Bolivia. In Comparative Political Studies. 46 (13): 66-93.

Supriatma Antonius Made Tony. 2009. Politik Indonesia: bergerak ke arah kartel?. Academia. https://www.academia.edu//2624379//politik-indonesia-bergerak-ke-arah-kartel// [Diakses pada 5 November 2014).

Usman Tiro. 2009. Laporan akuntan independen atas penerapan prosedur yang disepakati terhadap laporan penerimaan dan penggunaan dana kampanye pemilihan umum presiden dan wakil presiden tahun 2009 pasangan calon presiden dan wakil presiden Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono-Boediono. Jakarta: KAP Usman dan Rekan.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v12i1.7820

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.