The Value Relevance of Non-Financial Information to Firm Profitability: an Empirical Study on the Hypercompetitive Industry

Berto Usman(1), Chairil Afandy(2), Kamaludin Kamaludin(3),


(1) University of Bengkulu
(2) University of Bengkulu
(3) University of Bengkulu

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between non-financial information and firm profitability. The data and samples were extracted from publicly listed companies (PLCs) operating in the U.S. hypercompetitive industry. The U.S. (NYSE) setting of the study was chosen due to the efficiency of its capital market. The efficiency of the NYSE can be identified from the rapid adjustment of stock price movement as a consequence of incoming new information. By employing panel data regression analysis of 83 companies spanning from 2011 to 2016 (498 firm-year observations), this study tests the relevance of firms’ non-financial on firm profitability. The findings suggest that non-financial information has shown a positive and relevant association with firm profitability. Thus, the presence of CSR reports (CSR_Rep), and high CSR performance scores (CSR_Perf) as the proxies of non-financial information is positively associated with firms’ profitability (ROA and ROE). In this regard, the company might explore the benefit of gaining a positive reputation and better business legitimacy from society as well as their stakeholders.

Keywords

Corporate social responsibility; profitability; Hyper competitive industry

Full Text:

PDF

References

Amir, E., & Lev, B. (1996). Value-relevance of Non- Financial Information: the Wireless Commu- nications Industry. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 22(1–3), 3–30.

AXjonow, A., Ernstberger, J., & Pott, C. (2016). The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure on Corporate Reputation: a Non- Professional Stakeholder Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics

Bagnoli, M., & Watts, S. G. (2017). Voluntary Assur- ance of Voluntary CSR Disclosure. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 26(1), 205–230.

Baltagi, B. H. (2008). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. Econometric Theory, 13(05), 351.

Bebbington, J., Larrinaga-González, C., & Moneva- Abadía, J. M. (2008). Legitimating Reputa- tion/the Reputation of Legitimacy Theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(3), 371–374.

Bebbington, J., Larrinaga, C., & Moneva, J. M. (2008). Corporate Social Reporting and Reputation Risk Management. Accounting, Auditing & Ac- countability Journal, 21(3), 337–361.

Botosan, C. A., & Harris, M. S. (2000). Motivations for a Change in Disclosure Frequency and Its Consequences: an EXamination of Voluntary Quarterly Segment Disclosures. Journal of Ac- counting Research, 38(2), 329.

Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate Social Responsibility and Access to Finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1), 1–23.

Cho, S. Y., Lee, C., & Pfeiffer, R. J. (2013). Corporate Social Responsibility Performance and Infor- mation Asymmetry. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32(1), 71–83.

Cormier, D., & Magnan, M. (2015). The Economic Relevance of Environmental Disclosure and Its Impact on Corporate Legitimacy: an Em- pirical Investigation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(6), 431–450.

Devine, I., & Halpern, P. (2001). Implicit Claims: the Role of Corporate Reputation in Value Creation. Corporate Reputation Review, 4(1), 42–49.

Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary Nonfinancial Disclosure and the Cost of Equity Capital: the Initiation of Corporate Social Responsibility Report- ing. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59–100.

Dhaliwal, D. S., Radhakrishnan, S., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2012). Nonfinancial Disclosure and Analyst Forecast Accuracy: Internation- al Evidence on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure. The Accounting Review, 87(3), 723–759.

European Commission. (2014). Directive 2014/95/ EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014. Official Journal of the European Union.

Famiyeh, S. (2017). Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm’s Performance: Empirical Evidence. Social Responsibility Journal, 13(1), 131–148.

GRI. (2014). G4 Sustainability Reporting Guide- lines - Reporting Principles and Standard Disclosures. Global Reporting Initiative, 1–97.

Kamaludin, K., Usman, B., Rusdi, M., & Susanti,W. CSR Performance and CSR Disclosure Persistency: Empirical Evidence of the US Hypercompetitive Industry. Contaduría y Ad- ministración, 67(2), 335.

Lys, T., Naughton, J. P., & Wang, C. (2015). Signal- ing through Corporate Accountability Re- porting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 60(1), 56–72.

Manchiraju, H., & Rajgopal, S. (2017). Does Cor- porate Social Responsibility (CSR) Create Shareholder Value? Evidence from the Indian Companies act 2013. Journal of Accounting Research, 55(5), 1257–1300.

Mertens, W., Pugliese, A., & Recker, J. (2016). Quantitative Data Analysis: a Companion for Accounting and Information Systems Research. In Quantitative Data Analysis: a Companion for Accounting and Information Systems Research.

Michelon, G., Pilonato, S., Ricceri, F., & Roberts, R.

W. (2016). Behind Camouflaging: Tradition- al and Innovative Theoretical Perspectives in Social and Environmental Accounting Research. Sustainability Accounting, Manage- ment and Policy Journal, 7(1), 2–25.

Milne, M. J., & Patten, D. M. (2002). Securing Organizational Legitimacy: an EXperimen- tal Decision Case EXamining the Impact of Environmental Disclosures. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 372–405.

Neu, D., Warsame, H., & Pedwell, K. (1998). Man- aging Public Impressions: Environmental Disclosures in Annual Reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(3), 265–282.

Park, J., & Brorson, T. (2005). EXperiences of and Views on Third-party Assurance of Corpo- rate Environmental and Sustainability Reports. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13(10– 11), 1095–1106.

Simpson, A. (2010). Analysts’ Use of Nonfinancial Information Disclosures. Contemporary Ac- counting Research, 27(1), 249–288.

Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. Acad- emy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.

Tandelilin, E. & Usman, B. (2022), Toward a Better Understanding of Social Impact, CSR Reporting and Firm Performance: a Look at the ASEAN Banking Industry, Social Responsibility Journal, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print.

Usman, B. (2020a). CSR Performance, Firm’s Attri- butes, and Sustainability Reporting. Interna- tional Journal of Business and Society, 21(2), 521–539.

Usman, B. (2020b). CSR Reports, CSR Disclosure Quality, and Corporate Reputations: a Sys- tematic Literature Review. Indonesian Jour- nal of Sustainability Accounting and Manage- ment, 4(1).

Usman, B., Bernardes, O. T. F., & Kananlua, P. S. (2020). On the Nexus between CSR Prac- tices, ESG Performance, and Asymmetric In- formation. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 22(2), 151–177.

Usman, B., & Yennita, Y. (2018). CSR Practice and Asymmetry Information of Indonesian Pub- lic Listed Companies. International Research Journal of Business Studies, 11(1), 45–66.

Yoon, B., Lee, J. H., & Ryan, B. (2018). Does ESG Performance Enhance Firm Value? Evidence from Korea. Sustainability, 10, 1–18.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




mandiri88

slot88

slot thailand

tokeslot88 langkah 4d toto macau Hayobet slot depo 10k

tokeslot88 tokeslot88 langkah4d langkah4d langkah4d gdtoto


POSKOBET POSKOBET POSTOTO787 POSTOTO787 EMAS787 EMAS787 SUNDA787 SUNDA787/ ASIABET777 ASIABET777 https://pdakmi.kemenag.go.id https://mega888slots.com

tokeslot88 diamond murah voucher game

mideatoto

cemilanbet

tokeslot

gdtoto