Implementation of The Effectiveness of Regional Autonomy in Indonesia
(1) Universitas Sebelas Maret
(2) Universitas Sebelas Maret
(3) Universitas Sebelas Maret
(4) Universitas Sebelas Maret
(5) Universitas Bandar Lampung
Abstract
The drive of this study is to postulate empirical evidence about the evaluation of the enactment of regional autonomy in Indonesia after the enactment of Act Number 22 Year 1999 concerning Regional Government. Exclusively, this analysis aims to evaluate the wellbeing of the community, public services and regional competitiveness in the new autonomous regions. This research was conducted in 71 new autonomous regions in the Sumatra region after the depiction of Act Number 22 of 1999 concerning Regional Government during the 2000-2018 period. This type of research uses quantitative research. While the research method used is descriptive method, which is a research method that describes the population under study and consists of variables. The results of the study found that (1) the success rate of implementing regional autonomy for 20 years in the Sumatra region from the welfare aspect was 64.78%, meaning that the implementation of regional autonomy in the Sumatra region so far (64.78%) "has succeeded in increasing the HDI" according to the mandate of the law; (2) the level of success in implementing regional autonomy for 20 years in the Sumatra region from the aspect of regional competitiveness is 18.30%. The conclusion is that the implementation of regional autonomy in the Sumatra region has not been sufficiently successful in increasing regional competitiveness in terms of GRDP; (3) Riau Province is a region that has been very successful in implementing regional autonomy both in terms of welfare and regional competitiveness.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Act of Concering the National Development Program, Pub. L. No. 25 (2000).
Act of Concerning Regional Government, Pub. L. No. 32 (2004).
Act of Concerning Public Services, Pub. L. No. 25 (2009).
Act of Concerning Regional Government, Pub. L. No. 23 (2014).
Akpan, G. E. (2012). Governance and Development Performance : A Cross-Country Analysis of Sub-Saharan Africa. 3(14), 54–66.
Alisjahbana, A. S. (2002). dkk.(2002).“. Daya Saing Daerah, Konsep Dan Pengukurannya Di Indonesiaâ€, Yogyakarta, BPFE.
Badrudin, R., & Siregar, B. (2015). The evaluation of the implementation of regional autonomy in Indonesia. 1–11.
Kajian Percepatan Pembangunan Daerah Otonom Baru (DOB), (2008) (testimony of BAPPENAS).
Clipa, R. I. (2016). Measuring Regional Competitivens. The Case of Romania. The Annals of the University of Oradea. Economic Sciences, 25, 103–111.
Ghazali I & Chariri A. (2007). Teori Akuntansi (Edisi 1). UNDIP.
Gray, R. (2001). Thirty years of social accounting , reporting and auditing : what ( if anything ) have we learnt ? 9–15.
Irawati., et al. (2012). Regions based on Regional Economic Variables, Infrastructure and Natural Resources Variables, and Human Resources Variables in the Southeast Sulawesi Province [Daerah Berdasarkan Variabel Perekonomian Daerah, Variabel Infrastruktur dan Sumber Daya Alam, Serta Variabel Sumber Daya Manusia di Wilayah Provinsi Sulawesi Tenggara]. Jurnal TI Undip, VII(1).
Khairudin & Aminah. (2017). Regional Expansion and the Local Community Welfare : A Study of the Effectiveness of 20 Years of Implementation of Autonomy in Indonesia. 6(3), 263–276.
Khusaini, M. (2006). Public Economy: Fiscal decentralization and regional development [Ekonomi Publik: Desentralisasi fiskal dan pembangunan daerah]. FEB Universitas Brawijaya.
Mirza, D. S. (2012). The Effect of Poverty, Economic Growth, and Capital Expenditures on the Human Development Index in Central Java [Pengaruh Kemiskinan, Pertumbuhan Ekonomi, dan Belanja Modal Terhadap Indeks Pembangunan Manusia di Jawa Tengah]. Economics Development Analysis Journal, 1(1), 1–15.
Ratnawati, T. (2010). A decade of regional expansion in the Reformation era: the failure of regional autonomy [Satu dasa warsa pemekaran daerah era Reformasi: kegagalan otonomi daerah]. 21, 122–235.
Human Development Report 1990, (1990) (testimony of UNDP).
Widodo, A., Waridin, W., & Maria K, J. (2011). Analysis of the influence of government spending in the education and health sectors on poverty alleviation through the improvement of human development in Central Java province. [Analisis pengaruh pengeluaran pemerintah Di sektor pendidikan dan kesehatan Terhadap pengentasan kemiskinan melalui Peningkatan pembangunan manusia di Provinsi jawa tengah]. Jurnal Dinamika Ekonomi Pembangunan, 1(1), 1-183.
Cities in Transition : World Bank Urban and Local Government Strategy, (2001) (testimony of World Bank).
Zaman, K., Izhar, Z., Mushtaq, M., & Ahmad, M. (2012). The relationship between financial indicators and human development in Pakistan. Economic Modelling, 29(5), 1515–1523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.05.013
Regulation of the Minister of Utilization and State Apparatus of the Republic of Indonesia Number 14 of 2017 concerning Guidelines for Preparing Community Satisfaction Surveys for Public Service Provider Units.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.