Identification of Non-Education Tutors Difficulty In Education Process Of Learning Study Groups

Elizon Nainggolan(1), Mahfuzi Irwan(2),

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jne.v4i2.16004


(1) Department of Nonformal Education, Faculty of Education, Universitas Negeri Medan
(2) Department of Nonformal Education, Faculty of Education, Universitas Negeri Medan

Abstract

This study aims to find out what are the difficulties of tutors who hold degrees non-educational in the learning process of study group in Binjai. This study used a descriptive qualitative research method with the research subjects were two tutors of learning groups holding non-education bachelor’s degrees in Binjai city which were determined purposively. Data collected by interview, observation and documentation techniques. Collected data is analyzed by steps: data reduction, data presentation, conclusion and verification. The results showed that in the package B learning group learning process in Binjai City, tutors with non-education degrees had many difficulties in the learning process. The conclusion that can be obtained in this study is the difficulties identified are located in: (1) the learning planning process, namely the difficulty in preparing RPP and syllabus. (2) the process of implementing learning, namely difficulties in preliminary activities, core activities (exploration, elaboration, confirmation), closing activities, and (3) assessment of learning outcomes.

Keywords

education process, non-education tutor, learning study group

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ahmad, R. (1997). Media Instruksional Edukatif. Pt Rineka Cipta.

Akcaoglu, M., & Koehler, M. J. (2014). Cognitive outcomes from the Game-Design and Learning (GDL) after-school program. Computers & Education, 75, 72-81.

Angga, C. D. S. S. (2014). Problematika Guru Mata Pelajaran Biologi Kelas X SMA Negeri Se-Kecamatan Wonogiri Dalam Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013(Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta).

Arsyad, A. (2014). Media Pembelajaran. rev. ed. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Ashari, D. (2013). Model Pembelajaran Warga Belajar Kejar Paket C Di Tinjau Dari Prestasi Belajar Di Sanggar Kegiatan Belajar Gunungpati Kota Semarang (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Negeri Semarang).

Barbosa, D. N., Bassani, P. B., Martins, R. L., Mossmann, J. B., & Barbosa, J. L. (2016, July). Using mobile learning in formal and non-formal educational settings. In International Conference on Learning and Collaboration Technologies (pp. 269-280). Springer, Cham.

Benander, A., Benander, B., & Sang, J. (2004). Factors related to the difficulty of learning to program in Java—an empirical study of non-novice programmers. Information and Software Technology, 46(2), 99-107.

Border, S., Parton, W., Myers, M., Elmansouri, A., Harrison, C., Stephens, J., ... & Hall, S. (2017). Ten considerations for implementing effective and sustainable near-peer teaching in clinical anatomy education. MedEdPublish, 6.

Hall, S., Stephens, J., Parton, W., Myers, M., Harrison, C., Elmansouri, A., ... & Border, S. (2018). Identifying Medical Student Perceptions on the Difficulty of Learning Different Topics of the Undergraduate Anatomy Curriculum. Medical Science Educator, 1-4.

Du Boulay, B. (1986). Some difficulties of learning to program. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2(1), 57-73.

Dewantari, P. M. A. (2015). Identifikasi kesulitan guru IPA dalam melaksanakan pembelajaran kurikulum 2013 di SMP Negeri 1 Wonogiri tahun pelajaran 2014/2015 (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta,).

Elghoul, Y., Bahri, F., Chaari, N., Ezeddinie, S., Masmoudi, L., Souissi, N., & Frikha, M. (2018). Effect of difficulty manipulation strategies on acquisition, retention and associated perceptions in fine motor coordination task learning in young school boys. Physical Activity Review, 6, 100-109.

Goldbeck, R. A., & Campbell, V. N. (1962). The effects of response mode and response difficulty on programed learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 53(3), 110.

Inayati, R., Handayani, S., Kustiandi, J., Haryono, A., & Wahyono, H. (2018). The Analysis of the Difficulty in Learning Economics Subject Experienced by Students of Favored State Senior High Schools in City of Malang. KnE Social Sciences, 3(3), 195-210.

Irwan, M. Evaluasi program pelatihan keterampilan mengolah limbah kertas semen pada PKBM Cahaya Kota Binjai. JPPM (Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat), 4(2), 121-132.

Deniz, K. A. Y. A., & KEÅžAN, C. (2018). The Effect of Time on Difficulty of Learning (The Case of Problem Solving with Natural Numbers). MOJES: Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(1), 56-74.

Moleong, J. (2014). Lexy, Metodologi Penelitian kualitatif, Penerbit PT. Remaja Rosdakarya bandung.

Nair, P. (2016). A Discussion Of Literature Review Focussing On Essential Teaching Competencies. International Education And Research Journal, 2(4).

Nugroho, R., Rahma, R. A., & Yulianingsih, W. (2018). Contributing Factors toward the Participation of Education Equality Program Learners. Journal of Nonformal Education, 4(1), 79-88.

Nusche, D. (2008). Assessment of Learning Outcomes in Higher Education: A Comparative Review of Selected Practices. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 15. OECD Publishing (NJ1).

Saragih, A. H. (2008). Kompetensi minimal seorang guru dalam mengajar. Jurnal Tabularasa, 5(1), 23-34.

Zahroh, F. (2012). Problematika Guru IPA dalam Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu (Studi Kasus di MTs Mathalibul Huda Mlonggo Jepara Tahun Ajaran 2011/2012) (Doctoral dissertation, IAIN Walisongo).

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Indexing & Abstracting