Does Money Triumph over Identity? a Survey Findings from the Local Levels

Andhik Beni Saputra(1), Azhari Setiawan(2),

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/ipsr.v8i2.42301


(1) Universitas Andalas
(2) Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji.

Abstract

In this article, we try to analyze which factors emerged as the strongest determinants of voters’ behavior in a new democratic country dominated by the web of patronage and clientelistic exchanges. We examine two main variables in this study, vote buying and identity politics. Previous studies on electoral clientelism in Indonesia are mostly centered on its causes and mechanisms as an electoral strategy to garner electoral votes during an election. The socio-political contexts that follow the electoral dynamics are less explained. Initially, we assume that the intensive mobilization of identity politics that made the 2019 Indonesia election more explosive would decrease since voters would also solidify their voting preference into identity lines. However, through a post-election survey at the local level by selecting four districts (N=503), we find that vote buying emerges as a more robust variable in driving voters’ behavior rather than identity politics. Moreover, regional differentiation – land and coastal areas – also matter in this study where voters in the coastal regions are more likely to accept material inducements from candidates. Finally, our findings add many tasks for Indonesian democracy since clientelistic exchanges work as a more effective instrument for affecting voters' decision-making in elections rather than programmatic politics.

Keywords

vote buying; identity politics; voters’ behavior; the 2019 election

References

Aidt, T. S., & Jensen, P. S. (2017). From open to secret ballot: Vote buying and modernization. Comparative Political Studies, 50(5), 555–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016628268

Amindoni, A. (2019, April 7). Kompetisi pemilu semakin sengit, politik uang “semakin rawan.” BBC News Indonesia. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/indonesia-47747515

Aminuddin, M. F., & Attamimi, N. H. (2019). From Retail to Grocery: Money Politics in 2014 Indonesian Legislative Election. Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review, 4(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/ipsr.v4i1.12609

Aspinall, E. (2011). Democratization and ethnic politics in Indonesia: Nine theses. Journal of East Asian Studies, 11(2), 289–319.

Aspinall, E. (2014). When Brokers Betray: Clientelism, Social Networks, and Electoral Politics in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 46(4), 545–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2014.960706

Aspinall, E., & Berenschot, W. (2019). Democracy for Sale: Elections, Clientelism, and the State in Indonesia. New York: Cornell University.

Aspinall, E., Dettman, S., & Warburton, E. (2011). When religion trumps ethnicity: A regional election case study from Indonesia. South East Asia Research, 19(1), 27–58.

Aspinall, E., & Rohman, N. (2017). Village head elections in Java: Money politics and brokerage in the remaking of Indonesia’s rural elite. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 48(1), 31–52.

Aspinall, E., Rohman, N., Hamdi, A. Z., Rubaidi, & Triantini, Z. E. (2017). Vote Buying in Indonesia: Candidate Strategies, Market Logic and Effectiveness. Journal of East Asian Studies, 17, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1017/jea.2016.31

Aspinall, E., & Sukmajati, M. (2015). Patronase dan Klientelisme dalam Politik Elektoral di Indonesia. In E. Aspinall & M. Sukmajati (Eds.), Politik Uang di Indonesia: Patronase dan Klientelisme pada Pemilu Legislatif 2019 (pp. 1–49). Yogyakarta: Penerbit PolGov.

Berenschot, W. (2015). Clientelism, Trust Networks, and India’s Identity Politics: Conveying Closeness in Gujarat. Critical Asian Studies, 47(1), 24–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2015.997075

Berenschot, W. (2018). The political economy of clientelism: A comparative study of Indonesia’s patronage democracy. Comparative Political Studies, 51(12), 1563–1593.

Canare, T. A., Mendoza, R. U., & Lopez, M. A. (2018). An empirical analysis of vote buying among the poor: Evidence from elections in the Philippines. South East Asia Research, 26(1), 58–84.

Carkoglu, A., & Aytaç, S. E. (2015). Who gets targeted for vote-buying? Evidence from an augmented list experiment in Turkey. European Political Science Review: EPSR, 7(4), 547–566.

Çarkoğlu, A., & Aytaç, S. E. (2015). Who gets targeted for vote-buying? Evidence from an augmented list experiment in Turkey. European Political Science Review, 7(4), 547–566. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/S1755773914000320

Carlin, R. E., & Moseley, M. (2015). Good Democrats, Bad Targets: Democratic Values and Clientelistic Vote Buying. The Journal of Politics, 77(1), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1086/678307

Carreras, M., & İrepoğlu, Y. (2013). Trust in elections, vote buying, and turnout in Latin America. Electoral Studies, 32(4), 609–619.

Cox, G. W. (2010). Swing Voters, Core Voters, and Distributive Politics. In I. Shapiro, S. C. Stokes, E. J. Wood, & A. S. Kirshner (Eds.), Political Representation (pp. 342–357). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cox, G. W., & McCubbins, M. D. (1986). Electoral politics as a redistributive game. The Journal of Politics, 48(2), 370–389.

Cruz, C. (2019). Social Networks and the Targeting of Vote Buying. Comparative Political Studies, 52(3), 382–411.

Damanik, A. T. (2015). Medan, Sumatera Utara: Antara Politik Etnik dan Politik Uang. In E. Aspinall & M. Sukmajati (Eds.), Politik Uang di Indonesia: Patronase dan Klientelisme pada Pemilu Legislatif 2019 (pp. 100–125). Yogyakarta: Penerbit PolGov.

Danjibo, N. D., & Oladeji, A. (2007). Vote buying in Nigeria: an assessment of the 2007 general elections. Journal of African Elections, 6(2), 180–200.

Di Mascio, F. (2014). Exploring the link between patronage and party institutionalization: an historical-institutional analysis of the Italian transition. Democratization, 21(4), 678–698. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2013.764286

Diaz-Cayeros, A., Estévez, F., & Magaloni, B. (2016). The political logic of poverty relief: Electoral strategies and social policy in Mexico. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Ejdemyr, S., Kramon, E., & Robinson, A. L. (2018). Segregation, ethnic favoritism, and the strategic targeting of local public goods. Comparative Political Studies, 51(9), 1111–1143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414017730079

Fionna, U. (2016). The trap of pop-charisma for the institutionalization of Indonesia’s post-Suharto parties. Asian Journal of Political Science, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2015.1136227

Fudge, D., & Armaly, M. T. (2021). Place or Partisanship? The Conditional Role of Identities on Candidate Support. American Politics Research, 49(6), 655–665. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X211027859

Gonzalez-Ocantos, E., de Jonge, C. K., Meléndez, C., Nickerson, D., & Osorio, J. (2020). Carrots and sticks: Experimental evidence of vote-buying and voter intimidation in Guatemala. Journal of Peace Research, 57(1), 46–61.

Gonzalez Ocantos, E., de Jonge, C. K., & Nickerson, D. W. (2014). The Conditionality of Vote-Buying Norms: Experimental Evidence from Latin America. American Journal of Political Science, 58(1), 197–211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12047

Guardado, J., & Wantchekon, L. (2018). Do electoral handouts affect voting behavior? Electoral Studies, 53, 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2017.11.002

Habyarimana, J., Houser, D., Khemani, S., Brech, V., Choi, G. S., & Roy, M. (2021). Clientelism and identity. Economic and Political Studies, 9(1), 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/20954816.2020.1837335

Hagopian, F. (2007). Parties and Voters in Emerging Democracies. In C. Boix & S. C. Stokes (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics (pp. 582–603). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hicken, A. (2007). How do rules and institutions encourage vote buying? In F. C. Schaffer (Ed.), Elections for sale: The causes and consequences of vote buying (pp. 47–60). Lynne Rienner Publishers Boulder, CO.

Hicken, A. (2011). Clientelism. Annual Review of Political Science, 14, 289–310. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.031908.220508

Ibrahim. (2015). Bangka Belitung: Patronase dan Politik Identitas dalam Masyarakat Majemuk. In E. Aspinall & M. Sukmajati (Eds.), Politik Uang di Indonesia: Patronase dan Klientelisme pada Pemilu Legislatif 2019 (pp. 126–146). Yogyakarta: Penerbit PolGov.

Jacobs, N. F., & Munis, B. K. (2019). Place-based imagery and voter evaluations: Experimental evidence on the politics of place. Political Research Quarterly, 72(2), 263–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912918781035

Jafar, T. M. (2015). Bener Meriah, Aceh: Politik Uang dan Politik Etnisitas di Dapil Baru. In E. Aspinall & M. Sukmajati (Eds.), Politik Uang di Indonesia: Patronase dan Klientelisme pada Pemilu Legislatif 2019 (pp. 73–99). Yogyakarta: Penerbit PolGov.

Jensen, P. S., & Justesen, M. K. (2014). Poverty and vote buying: Survey-based evidence from Africa. Electoral Studies, 33, 220–232.

Johnson, M. (2020). Electoral Discrimination: The Relationship between Skin Color and Vote Buying in Latin America. World Politics, 72(1), 80–120. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/S0043887119000145

Kao, K., Lust, E., & Rakner, L. (2022). Vote-buying, anti-corruption campaigns, and identity in African elections. World Development, 160, 106064. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.106064

Kitschelt, H., & Kselman, D. M. (2013). Economic development, democratic experience, and political parties’ linkage strategies. Comparative Political Studies, 46(11), 1453–1484. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414012453450

Kitschelt, H., & Wilkinson, S. I. (2007). Citizen-politician linkages: an introduction. In H. Kitschelt & S. I. Wilkinson (Eds.), Patrons, clients, and policies: Patterns of democratic accountability and political competition (Vol. 2007, pp. 1–49). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Cambridge.

Knutsen, C. H., Gerring, J., SKAANING, S., Teorell, J., Maguire, M., Coppedge, M., & Lindberg, S. I. (2019). Economic development and democracy: An electoral connection. European Journal of Political Research, 58(1), 292–314.

Kramon, E. (2016a). Electoral Handouts as Information: Explaining Unmonitored Vote Buying. World Politics, 68(3), 454–498. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887115000453

Kramon, E. (2016b). Where is vote buying effective? Evidence from a list experiment in Kenya. Electoral Studies, 44, 397–408.

Kramon, E. (2019). Ethnic group institutions and electoral clientelism. Party Politics, 25(3), 435–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068817728212

Lawson, C., & Greene, K. F. (2014). Making clientelism work: How norms of reciprocity increase voter compliance. Comparative Politics, 47(1), 61–85.

Lindbeck, A., & Weibull, J. W. (1987). Balanced-budget redistribution as the outcome of political competition. Public Choice, 52(3), 273–297.

LSI. (2015). Laporan Rilis Survei “Partai Politik di Mata Publik.” Jakarta. Retrieved from http://www.lsi.or.id/riset/436/Rilis-LSI-Partai-Politik-diMata-Publik

Lubke, C. von. (2012). Striking the Right Balance. Economic Concentration and Local Government Performance in Indonesia and the Philippines. European Journal of East Asian 5tudies, 11(1), 17–44. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700615-20120005

Lyons, J., & Utych, S. M. (2021). You’re not from here!: The consequences of urban and rural identities. Political Behavior, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-021-09680-3

Magaloni, B., Diaz-Cayeros, A., & Est´evez, F. (2007). Clientelism and portfolio diversification: a model of electoral investment with applications to Mexico. In H. Kitschelt & S. I. Wilkinson (Eds.), Patrons, Clients, and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition (pp. 182–205). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mares, I., & Young, L. E. (2018). The core voter’s curse: Clientelistic threats and promises in Hungarian elections. Comparative Political Studies, 51(11), 1441–1471. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018758754

Muhtadi, B. (2013). Politik uang dan dinamika elektoral di Indonesia: Sebuah kajian awal interaksi antara “Party-ID” dan Patron-Klien. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 10(1), 17.

Muhtadi, B. (2019a). Politik Uang dan New Normal dalam Pemilu Paska-Orde Baru. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 5(1), 55–74. https://doi.org/0.32697/integritas.v5i1.413

Muhtadi, B. (2019b). Vote Buying in Indonesia: The Mechanics of Electoral Bribery. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.

Muller, W. C. (2007). Political institutions and linkage strategies. In H. Kitschelt & S. I. Wilkinson (Eds.), Patrons, Clients, and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition (pp. 251–275). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nemčok, M., Komar, O., Batrićević, N., Tóth, M., & Spáč, P. (2021). The role of ethnicity in the perception of pork barrel politics: Evidence from a survey experiment in Slovakia. Politics, 41(2), 257–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395720920089

Nichter, S. (2008). Vote Buying or Turnout Buying? Machine Politics and the Secret Ballot. American Political Science Review, 102(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055408080106

Nichter, S. (2014). Conceptualizing Vote Buying. Electoral Studies, 35, 315–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2014.02.008

Novaes, L. M. (2018). Disloyal brokers and weak parties. American Journal of Political Science, 62(1), 84–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12331

Pepinsky, T. (2019, May 29). Religion, Ethnicity, and Indonesia’s 2019 Presidential Election. New Mandala. Retrieved from https://tompepinsky.com/2019/05/27/religion-ethnicity-and-indonesias-2019-presidential-election/

Pradhanawati, A., Tawakkal, G. T. I., & Garner, A. D. (2019). Voting Their Conscience: Poverty, Education, Social Pressure and Vote Buying in Indonesia. Journal of East Asian Studies, 19(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/jea.2018.27

Putra, H. S. (2017). Determinants of Vote Buying in Local Head Election in Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Praja: Journal of Home Affairs Governance, 9(2), 205–218.

Rueda, M. R. (2015). Vote buying and associational life. Unpublished Paper. Http://Www. Miguelrueda. Net/Documents/Non_anonymous. Pdf.

Saputra, A. B., & Setiawan, A. (2021). Kontestasi Politik, Distribusi Uang dan Paradoks Modernisasi. Analisis CSIS, 50(2), 229–249.

Schulte-Cloos, J., & Bauer, P. C. (2021). Local candidates, place-based identities, and electoral success. Political Behavior, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-021-09712-y

Shin, J. H. (2015). Voter Demands for Patronage: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of East Asian Studies, 15, 127–151. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1598240800004197

Shockley, B., & Gengler, J. J. (2020). Social identity and coethnic voting in the Middle East: Experimental evidence from Qatar. Electoral Studies, 67, 102213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102213

Stankov, N. (2020). Voting, clientelism, and identity: experimental evidence from Montenegro. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 20(3), 473–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2020.1766862

Stokes, S. C. (2005). Perverse Accountability: A Formal Model of Machine Politics with Evidence from Argentina. American Political Science Review, 99(3), 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051683

Stokes, S. C. (2007). Political Clientelism. In Charles Boix & S. C. Stokes (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics (pp. 604–627). New York: Oxford University Press.

Stokes, S. C., Dunning, T., Nazareno, M., & Busco, V. (2013). Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Syambudi, I. (2019, April 15). Ada 7.647 Percakapan Soal Politik Uang Jelang Pencoblosan Pemilu. Tirto.Id. Retrieved from https://tirto.id/ada-7647-percakapan-soal-politik-uang-jelang-pencoblosan-pemilu-dmbd

Tawakkal, G. T. I., Suhardono, W., Garner, A. D., & Seitz, T. (2017). Consistency and Vote Buying: Income, Education and Attitudes about Vote Buying in Indonesia. Journal of East Asian Studies, 1–17. https://doi.org/doi:10.1017/jea.2017.15

Ufen, A. (2017). Party presidentialization in post-Suharto Indonesia. Contemporary Politics, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2017.1413499

Van Klinken, G. (2008). The limits of ethnic clientelism in Indonesia. Review of Indonesian and Malaysian Affairs (RIMA), 42(2), 35–65.

Warburton, E. (2019, April 16). Polarisation in Indonesia: what if perception is reality? New Mandala. Retrieved from https://www.newmandala.org/how-polarised-is-indonesia/

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2023 Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review

License URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/