ACTORS' APPROACH IN THE DISCOURSE OF REJECTING THE THRESHOLD FOR PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDACY IN GENERAL ELECTIONS IN INDONESIA

Mukti Abdul Gani(1), Yusuf Fadli(2), Adie Dwiyanto Nurlukman(3), Riska Sarofah(4),

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/ipsr.v8i2.45249


(1) Program Studi Ilmu Pemerintahan Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang
(2) Program Studi Ilmu Pemerintahan Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang
(3) Program Studi Ilmu Pemerintahan Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang
(4) Program Studi Ilmu Politik Universitas Siliwangi

Abstract

Civil society groups and political parties have disagreed with the presidential threshold article passed by Parliament and the government. The regulation is considered to limit the democratic rights and freedom of the public in choosing, determining, and submitting themselves as presidential candidates. This study aims to explain how actors (agencies) build movements against presidential threshold regulations (structure). The theory used in this study is Anthony Giddens' structuration theory. This research uses qualitative methods by analyzing some content in online media and Constitutional Court rulings related to presidential threshold lawsuits and processing data using the Nvivo 12+ application. The findings of this study indicate that the most crucial aspect of the movement against actors is that it is conducted by challenging the presidential threshold rule before the Constitutional Court, developing public opinion, and holding multiple demonstrations. Second, the size of the presidential threshold rejection vote is based on the future of democracy and freedom, weakening the presidential system and contradicting other regulations. Third, of the many lawsuits filed by the public and political parties, the Constitutional Court has consistently rejected them because the rule is an open legal policy, which means fully being a lawmaker, in this case, in Parliament.

Keywords

Presidential Threshold, Actors, General Elections, Democracy

References

Achmad, Z. A. (2020). Anatomi Teori Strukturasi Dan Ideologi Jalan Ketiga Anthony Giddens. Translitera : Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi Dan Studi Media, 9(2), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.35457/translitera.v9i2.989

Anggara, V. (2019). Dinamika Presidential Threshold dalam Sistem Presidensial di Indonesia. Jurnal Transformative, 5(September), 17–36.

Ansori, L. (2017). Telaah Terhadap Presidential Threshold Dalam Pemilu Serentak 2019. Jurnal Yuridis, 4(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.35586/.v4i1.124

Aryani, Nyoman, M., Hermanto, & Bagus. (2018). Rekonstruksi Kejelasan Kedudukan Wakil Presiden dalam Kerangka Penguatan dan Penegasan Sistem Presidensiil Indonesia. Legislasi Indonesia, 15 No.2(December), 92.

Banks, S. P., & Riley, P. (1993). Structuration Theory as an Ontology for Communication Research. Annals of the International Communication Association, 16(1), 167–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1993.11678851

Baskoro, A. (2019). Presidential Threshold di Indonesia dalam Perspektif Maslahah Mursalah. Legislatif, 2(2), 38–56.

Detiknews. (2019). Sejumlah Pakar Hukum Kritik Presidential Threshold. Detiknews. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-4652967/sejumlah-pakar-hukum-kritik-presidential-threshold

Fadli, Y., & Sarofah, R. (2021). How Far Is The Community Involved in Structuring Sustainable Settlements in Indonesia? Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah Dan Kota, 17(1), 25–36.

Fadlillah, I. (2022). Threshold dan Masa Depan Demokrasi di Indonesia. Staatsrecht: Jurnal Hukum Kenegaraan Dan Politik Islam, 2(1), 28–47. https://doi.org/10.14421/staatsrecht.v2i1.2532

Fenwick, T. B., Burges, S. W., & Power, T. J. (2017). Five faces of presidential governance: insights from policy-making in democratic Brazil. Policy Studies, 38(3), 205–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2017.1290232

Fikri, S., Riqiey, B., L, M. I., & Janah, M. (2022). Problematika Konstitusionalitas Presidential Threshold Di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Positum, 7(1), 1–24.

Fukuoka, Yuki, & Djani, L. (2016). Revisiting the rise of jokowi: The triumph of reformasi or an oligarchic adaptation of postclientelist initiatives? South East Asia Research, 24(2), 204–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967828X16649044

Gobel, R. T. S. (2019). Rekonseptualisasi Ambang Batas Pencalonan Presiden dan Wakil Presiden (Presidential Threshold) Dalam Pemilu Serentak. Jambura Law Review, 1(1), 94. https://doi.org/10.33756/jalrev.v1i1.1987

Hapsari, D. Y. P., & Sarawasti, R. (2023). Dampak Pelaksanaan Presidential Threshold pada Pemilu Serentak terhadap Demokrasi di Indonesia. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 5(1), 70–84. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v5i1.70-84

Ibrahim, G., Siar, L., Kasenda, & D., V. D. (2021). Presidential Threshold Dalam Sistem Demokrasi Indonesia Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Dasar 1945. Jurnal Mercatoria, 1(1), 174–200. http://www.abdiinsani.unram.ac.id/index.php/jurnal/article/view/376%0Ahttps://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1991.n.20210906.1730.014.html%0Ahttps://embiss.com/index.php/embiss/article/view/68

Juliantono, F. J., & Munandar, A. (2016). Fenomena Kemiskinan Nelayan: Perspektif Teori Strukturasi Fishermen Poverty Phenomenon: Structuration Theory Perspective. Jurnal Kajian Politik Dan Masalah Pembangunan, 12(2), 1857–1866.

Kamuri, J. P. (2021). Konsep Worldview: Usaha Melengkapi Konsep Struktur dalam Teori Strukturasi Giddens. Jurnal Filsafat, 31(2), 220. https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.60704

Kinseng, R. A. (2017). Struktugensi: sebuah teori tindakan. Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan, 5(2), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.22500/sodality.v5i2.17972

Kis-Katos, Krisztina, & Sjahrir, B. S. (2017). The impact of fiscal and political decentralization on local public investment in Indonesia. Journal of Comparative Economics, 45(2), 344–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2017.03.003

Kumparannews.com. (2018). Pemuda Muhammadiyah Demo Tolak Presidential Threshold di Gedung MK. Kumparan.Com. https://kumparan.com/kumparannews/pemuda-muhammadiyah-demo-tolak-presidential-threshold-di-gedung-mk-1533702910187472958/full

Kurnia, T. S. (2020). Normalisasi Hubungan Pusat – Daerah Sesuai Konstitusi Presidensial. Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(2), 135–154. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2020.v4.i2.p135-154

Kusnadi, K. (2018). Refleksi Hukum. Ejournal.Uksw.Edu, 3(3), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2019.v4.i1.p115-134

Mello, E., & Spektor, M. (2018). Brazil: The costs of multiparty presidentialism. Journal of Democracy, 29(2), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2018.0031

mkri.id. (2018). Ambang Batas Pencalonan Presiden Digugat Pemilih Pemula. Mahkamah Konstitusi. https://www.mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Berita&id=14583&menu=2

Muhammad Saad, D. F. S. (2021). Keadilan Dalam Pemilu Berdasarkan Sistem Presidensial Threshold. Widya Pranata Hukum : Jurnal Kajian Dan Penelitian Hukum, 3(1), 15–37. https://doi.org/10.37631/widyapranata.v3i1.268

Munawarman, Abdul, Novita, & Anggi. (2022). Analisis Terhadap Presidential Threshold Dalam Kepentingan Oligarki. Jurnal Rechten : Riset Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 3(2), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.52005/rechten.v3i2.40

Nirzalin. (2013). Mendamaikan Aktor dan Struktur dalam Analisis Sosial Perspektif Teori. Jurnal Sosiologi Universitas Syiah Kuala, 3(3), 15–25.

Octovina, R. A. (2018). Sistem Presidensial Di Indonesia. CosmoGov, 4(2), 247. https://doi.org/10.24198/cosmogov.v4i2.17065

Pérez-Liñán, A., Schmidt, N., & Vairo, D. (2019). Presidential hegemony and democratic backsliding in Latin America, 1925–2016. Democratization, 26(4), 606–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1566321

Pontas.id. (2021). Deklarasi Gemas Jatim Tuntut Penghapusan Persekongkolan Jahat Presidential Threshold 20 Persen. Pontas.Id.

Pratama, A. P. (2020). Analisis Yuridis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 53/PUUXV/2017 Berkaitan Dengan Penolakan Uji Materi Presidential Threshold Dalam Pengusungan Calon …. In Jurnal Novum (Vol. 05). https://repository.ubt.ac.id/?p=show_detail%5C&id=/index.php?p=show_detail%5C&id=6293%5C&keywords=

Reuchamps, M., Onclin, F., Caluwaerts, D., & Baudewyns, P. (2014). Raising the Threshold, Fighting Fragmentation? Mechanical and Psychological Effects of the Legal Electoral Threshold in Belgium. West European Politics, 37(5), 1087–1107. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2014.925736

Rianisa Mausili, D. (2019). Presidential Threshold Anomaly in Indonesian Government System: Parlementer Reduction in Indonesian Presidential System. Bappenas Working Papers, 2(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.47266/bwp.v2i1.28

Seeberg, M. B., Wahman, M., & Skaaning, S. E. (2018). Candidate nomination, intra-party democracy, and election violence in Africa. Democratization, 25(6), 959–977. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2017.1420057

Sindonews. (2022). Kritik Presidential Threshold 20%, Fahri Hamzah: Yang Punya Bohir Jadi Capres. SINDONEWS.Com. https://nasional.sindonews.com/read/650435/12/kritik-presidential-threshold-20-fahri-hamzah-yang-punya-bohir-jadi-capres-1641542518

Thoyibbah, I. (2016). Makna Kejahatan Struktural Korupsi Dalam Perspektif Teori Strukturasi Anthony Giddens. Jurnal Filsafat, 25(1), 134. https://doi.org/10.22146/jf.12617

van Rooyen, M. (2013). Structure and agency in news translation: An application of Anthony Giddens' structuration theory. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 31(4), 495–506. https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2013.864445

Wegmann, Simone, & Evequoz, A. (2019). Legislative functions in newly democratised countries: the use of parliamentary questions in Kenya and Zambia. Journal of Legislative Studies, 25(4), 443–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2019.1697057

Yusuf, B., & Ridwan, H. (2018). Manajemen Komunikasi Dalam Pengelolaan Informasi Pembangunan Daerah (Pada Biro Humas Dan PDE Sekretariat Daerah Propinsi Sulawesi Tenggara). Jurnal Komunikasi Hasil Pemikiran Dan Penelitian, 4(1), 50–64. https://journal.uniga.ac.id/index.php/JK/article/view/357

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2023 Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review

License URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/