The Effects of Brain-Based Teaching With I-Think Maps and Brain Gym Approach towards Physics Understanding
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of Brain-Based Teaching with i-Think Maps and the Brain Gym Approach (BBT-iTBA) compared to the conventional teaching approach (CTA) towards Physics’ conceptual understanding amongst male and female matriculation students in the north of Peninsular Malaysia. 180 students (83 were male and 97 were female), aged around 19 years old, from two Matriculation Colleges, were involved as research sample for the targeted population. The effects of the BBT-iTBA compared to the CTA towards Physics’ conceptual understanding amongst students were determined using a quasi-experimental non-equivalent group design, involving an experimental group of students (exposed to BBT-iTBA) and a control group of students (received CTA). Data gathered from the Physics Conceptual Understanding Test (PCUT), administered on the sample before and after the intervention of both teaching approaches, were then analyzed statistically. The two way ANOVA analysis results indicated that after the intervention, students’ Physics conceptual understanding differ significantly due to the implementation of the different teaching approaches, with a great size effect. Students who were exposed to BBT-iTBA performed significantly better in the PCUT than students who received CTA. Although gender alone did not affect students’ Physics conceptual understanding, the results obtained revealed that the effects of the interaction between the implementation of the teaching approaches and gender on the attainment of students’ Physics conceptual understanding were significant, with a simple size effect. The main features of the BBT-iTBA, which are: focusing on the optimum function of the brain; promoting and enhancing the skills of thinking; and creating a relaxed and fun learning environment; are found to be the significant triggers for students to better understand Physics conceptually and excel in the subject.
               Â
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abd. Karim, M.M. (2005). Kajian profil kemasukan dan prestasi pelajar Fakulti Sains dan Teknologi UPSI ambilan semester 1 2003/2004. Malaysia: Penerbit Universiti Perguruan Sultan Idris.
Abdul Kadir, M.N.B, Abdul Karim, M.M., & Abd. Rahman, N. (2016). Sikap Pelajar Terhadap Pembelajaran Fizik dan Hubungannya dengan Pencapaian dalam Kalangan Pelajar Sains. Jurnal Personalia Pelajar, 19(1), 23-38.
Akyurek, E., & Afacan, O. (2013). Effects of Brain-Based Learning Approach on Students’ Motivation and Attitudes Levels in Science Class. Online Submission, 3(1), 104-119.
Banas, J. A., Dunbar, N., Rodriguez, D., & Liu, S. J. (2011). A review of humor in educational settings: Four decades of research. Communication Education, 60(1), 115-144.
Banchonhattakit, P., Duangsong, R., Muangsom, N., Kamsong, T., & Phangwan, K. (2012). Effectiveness of brain-based learning and animated cartoons for enhancing healthy habits among school children in Khon Kaen, Thailand. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health, 27(2), 2028-2039.
Bani-Salameh, H. N. (2016). How persistent are the misconceptions about force and motion held by college students?. Physics Education, 52(1), 1-7.
Bates, S., Donelly, R., MacPhee, C., Sands, D, Birch, N., & Walet, N. R. (2013). Gender differences in conceptual understanding of Newtonian mechanics: a UK cross-institution comparison. European Journal of Physics Education, 34(2), 421-438.
Bawaneh, A. K. A., Zain, A. N. M., Saleh, S., & Abdullah, A. G. K. (2012). The effect of a brain-based teaching method on conceptual change in students’ understanding of electricity. Eurasian Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, 4(2), 79-96.
Ben, F. (2010). Students’ uptake of physics: a study of South Australian and Filipino physics students (Doctoral dissertation).
binti Mazlan, A. (2017, February). Kesan Pendekatan Pengajaran Berasaskan Otak dengan Integrasi i-Think dan Brain Gym (PPBO-iTB) ke Atas Motivasi Fizik Pelajar Matrikulasi. In e-Proceedings iCompEx17 Academic Paper.
Birch, M., & Walet, N. (2012). Gender differences in students’ conceptual understanding of Newtonian Mechanics. STEM Learning and Teaching issues 1: HEA STEM Conference 2012; 12 Apr 2012-13 Apr 2012; Imperial College. HEA Academy. Retrieved from https://www.escholar.manchester.ac.uk/api/datastream?publicationPid=uk-ac-man-scw:178133&datastreamId=FULL-TEXT.PDF
Caine, R. N., Caine, G., McClintic, C., & Klimek, K. J. (2015). 12 Brain/mind Learning Principles in Action: Teach for the Development of Higher-order Thinking and Executive Function. Corwin Press.
Cassidy, R., Cattan, S., Crawford, C., & Dytham, S. (2018). How can we increase girls’ uptake of maths and physics A-level? London, England: Institute for Fiscal Studies. Retrieved from https://www.ifs.org.uk/publications/13277.
Ceci, S. J., Ginther, D. K., Kahn, S., & Williams, W. M. (2014). Women in academic science: A changing landscape. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 15(3), 75-141.
Ceci, S. J., Williams, W. M., & Barnett, S. M. (2009). Women‘s underrepresentation in science: sociocultural and biological considerations. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 218-261.
Checkley, D. (2010). High school students’ perceptions of physics. (Master’s Thesis). University of Lethbridge, Alberta. Retrieved from https://opus.uleth.ca/bitstream/handle/10133/2584/checkley,%20doug.pdf
Coletta, V. P., Phillips, J. A., & Steinert, J. (2012, February). FCI normalized gain, scientific reasoning ability, thinking in physics, and gender effects. In AIP conference proceedings(Vol. 1413, No. 1, pp. 23-26). AIP.
Costu, B., Ayas, A., & Niaz, M. (2010). Promoting conceptual change in first year students’ understanding of evaporation. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 11(1), 5–16.
Dennison, P. E. & Dennison, G. E. (2010). Brain gym -Teacher’s Edition. Ventura, U.S.A.: Edu-Kinesthetics, Inc.
Eilam, E., & Barry, F. (2016). Females’ exclusion from Physics: Examining two deterring factors. The New Educational Review, 44(2), 40–51.
Fazil, F., & Saleh, S. (2016). Kesan pendekatan pengajaran berasaskan otak terhadap motivasi pembelajaran sains. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Matematik Malaysia (JPSMM UPSI), 6(1), 68-78.
Graham, T., Berry, J. & Rowlands, S. (2013). Are ‘misconceptions’ or alternative frameworks of force and motion spontaneous or formed prior to instruction? International of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 44(1), 84 – 103.
Granger, E. M., Bevis, T. H., Saka, Y., Southerland, S. A., Sampson, V., & Tate, R. L. (2012). The efficacy of student-centered instruction in supporting science learning. Science, 338(6103), 105-108.
Halim, L., Mohd, T. S., & Haron, Z. (2002). Strategi pengajaran fizik untuk guru sains. Malaysia: Pearson Education.
Hall, T., & Strangman, N. (2002). Graphic organizers. National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum, 1-8.
Hassan, S. R., Rosli, R., & Zakaria, E. (2016). The Use of i-Think Map and Questioning to Promote Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Mathematics. Creative Education, 7(7), 1069-1078.
Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30(3), 141–158. Retrieved from https://www.ws.k12.ny.us/Downloads/ForceConceptInventory1.pdf
Hyerle, D., & Yeager, C. (2007). Thinking Maps: A Language for Learning. Cary, NC: Thinking Maps, Inc.
Jecinth J., & Velayudhan, A. (2007). The Effect of Brain Gym Exercises on Self- Esteem and SensoryProcessing Speed on High School Hearing Impaired Students. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 4(2-93), 148-154.
Jensen, E. (2008). Brain-based learning: The new paradigm of teaching. California: Corwin Press.
Kamarudin, M. I. B., & Isa, H. N. B. H. (2010). Tahap Kefahaman aan Pengaplikasian Konsep Daya dan Tekanan dalam Kehidupan Seharian dalam Kalangan Pelajar Tahun Akhir Program Pendidikan Fizik. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Institutional Repository. Retreived from http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/10943/
Kapucu, S. (2014). Salient Beliefs of Pre-Service Primary School Teachers Underlying an Attitude†Liking or Disliking Physicsâ€. Science Education International, 25(4), 437-458.
Karamustafaoglu, O. (2009). Active Learning Strategies in Physics Teaching. Online Submission, 1(1), 27-50.
Kariuki, P. N., & Kent, H. D. (2014). The Effects of Brain Gym® Activities and Traditional Teaching Strategies on Students’ Performance in Comprehension in a 4th Grade Classroom. Online Submission. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED550515.pdf
Kost, L. E., Pollock, S. J., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2009). Characterizing the gender gap in introductory Physics. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 5(1), 1-14.
Koul, R., Roy, L., & Lerdpornkulrat, T. (2012). Motivational goal orientation, perceptions of biology and physics classroom learning environments, and gender. Learning Environments Research, 15(2), 217-229.
KPM (Kem. Pelajaran Malaysia). (2012). Laporan strategi mencapai Dasar 60:40. Retrieved from https://www.scribd.com/doc/297461215/LAPORAN-STRATEGI-MENCAPAI-DASAR-6040-ppt-Ogos-2013-ppt
Laad, M. (2011). Causes Responsible for Declining Interest of Students in Learning Physics at Higher Level: An Indian Perspective. International Journal of Pure and Applied Physics. 7(2), 151-158.
Lasry, N., Finkelstein, N., & Mazur, E. (2009). Are most people too dumb for physics?. The Physics Teacher, 47(7), 418-422.
Li, J., & Singh, C. (2012, February). Developing a magnetism conceptual survey and assessing gender differences in student understanding of magnetism. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1413, No. 1, pp. 43-46). AIP.
Long, D. J., & Carlson, D. (2011). Mind the map: How thinking maps affect student achievement. Networks: An Online Journal for Teacher Research, 13(2), 262-262.
Lucas, R. W. (2003). The creative training idea book: Inspired tips and techniques for engaging and effective learning. New York: AMACOM.
Madsen, A., McKagan, S. B., & Sayre, E. C. (2015). How Physics instruction impacts students’ beliefs about learning Physics: A meta-analysis of 24 studies. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 11(1), 1-19.
Maneval, R. E., Filburn, M. J., Deringer, S. O., & Lum, G. D. (2011). Concept mapping: does it improve critical thinking ability in practical nursing students? Nursing Education Perspectives, 32(4), 229-233.
McNerney, M. W., & Radvansky, G. A. (2015). Mind racing: The influence of exercise on long-term memory consolidation. Memory, 23(8), 1140-1151.
Mekonnen, S. (2014). Problems Challenging the Academic Performance of Physics Students in Higher Governmental Institutions in the Case of Arbaminch, Wolayita Sodo, Hawassa and Dilla Universities. Natural Science, 6(5), 362-375.
Oladejo, M. A., Olosunde, G. R., Ojebisi, A. O., & Isola, O. M. (2011). Instructional materials and students’ academic achievement in Physics: some policy implications. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(1), 112-126.
Phang, F.A., Abu, M.S., Ali, M.B., Salleh, S. (2010). Faktor Penyumbang Kepada Kemerosotan Penyertaan Pelajar dalam Aliran Sains: Satu Analisis Sorotan Tesis. Sains Humanika, 2(4), 63-71.
Piaw, C. Y. (2014). Effects of Gender and Thinking Style on Student’s Creative Thinking Ability. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116(2014), 5135-5139.
Rosen, Y., & Tager, M. (2014). Making student thinking visible through a concept map in computer-based assessment of critical thinking. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 50(2), 249-270.
Sahin, M., & Yorek, N. (2009). A comparison of problem-based learning and traditional lecture students expectations and course grades in an introductory physics classroom. Scientific Research and Essays, 4(8), 753-762.
Saleh, S & Subramaniam, L. (2018). Effects of Brain-Based Teaching Method on Physics achievement among ordinary school students. Kasetsart Journal of Social Science (in press), 1-5. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452315117303636
Saleh, S. (2011). The level of B. Sc. Ed students’ conceptual understanding of Newtonian Physics. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 1(3), 249-256.
Salleh, N. I., & Phang, F. A. (2012). Pengajaran Free-Body Diagram (FBD) Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Tajuk Daya Tingkatan Empat (Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia).
Saswika, W. (2014). Pengaruh Penerapan Strategi Pembelajaran Everyone is a Teacher Here dengan Metode Mind Map Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Matematika Siswa MTs Hasanah Pekanbaru (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau).
Tebabal, A., & Kahssay, G. (2011). The effects of student-centered approach in improving students’ graphical interpretation skills and conceptual understanding of kinematical motion. Latin-American Journal of Physics Education, 5(2), 374-381.
Tokuhama-Espinosa, T. (2015). The new science of teaching and learning: Using the best of mind, brain, and education science in the classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
Veloo, A., Nor, R., & Khalid, R. (2015). Attitude towards physics and additional mathematics achievement towards physics achievement. International Education Studies, 8(3), 35-43.
Watson, S. & Kelso, G. L. (2014). The Effect of Brain Gym® on Academic Engagement for Children with Developmental Disabilities. International Journal of Special Education, 29(2), 1-9.
Wilson, K., Low, D., Verdon, M., & Verdon, A. (2016). Differences in gender performance on competitive physics selection tests. Physical Review Physics Education Research 12(2), 1-16.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
