The Development of STEM Mobile Learning Package Ecosystem

S. Ngabekti, A. P. B. Prasetyo, R. D. Hardianti, J. Teampanpong

Abstract

This study aims to: develop and test the validity, legibility and effectiveness of STEM Mobile Learning Package ecosystems on students’ science and technology literacy using R & D research design. STEM Mobile Learning Package was validated by media experts and material experts. The level of legibility is measured by questionnaire through the results of a small-scale trial of a Biology student class. The effectiveness of the application was measured in wide-scale test for biology and natural science students. Data were analyzed using descriptive quantitative.The results showed the the validity on learning package from experts showed valid in 83,6%. Some revisions are needed especially on video aspect which will be better filled with not only text but also voice. Base on data collected from 47 students who have completely filled 12 statements in questionnaire, about 78,7% students stated they could understand the questions very well. Most of students (97,8%) agreed that the use of STEM enhanced their science literacy. Percentage of students that agreed on 12 statements ranged from 74,5% to 100%. Thus those result indicated a high level of legibility Although learning packages can be studied independently, certain topics still requiredto be directly discussed. This learning package is effective on student scientific literacy ranging from 64.6 to 98.6. While the highest achievement of student technology literacy is 92 with an average of 70.32. This study concludes that STEM Mobile Learning Package Ecosystem has good validity and legibility, as well as effective on students’ science and technology literacy.

Keywords

ecosystem, mobile learning, STEM

Full Text:

PDF

References

Anih, E., & Nurhasanah, N. (2016). Legibility Level of Texts in the 2013 Curriculum Package Book of 4 Grade Elementary School Using Formula Grafik Fry. Jurnal PGSD STKIP Subang, 1(2), 181-189.

Barak, M. (2014). Closing the Gap between Attitudes and Perceptions about ICT-Enhanced Learning Among Pre-Service STEM Teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(1), 1-14.

Barokati, N., & Annas, F. (2013). Pengembangan Pembelajaran Berbasis Blended Learning pada Mata Kuliah Pemrograman Komputer (Studi Kasus: UNISDA Lamongan). SISFO Vol 4 No 5, 4.

Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM Education: A 2020 Vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30-35.

Chandra, V., & Mills, K. A. (2015). Transforming the Core Business of Teaching and Learning in Classrooms through ICT. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24(3), 285-301.

Curtis, T. (Ed.). (2014). Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education: Trends and Alignment with Workforce Needs. Nova Science Publishers, Incorporated.

Dai, T., & Cromley, J. G. (2014). Changes in Implicit Theories of Ability in Biology and Dropout from STEM Majors: A Latent Growth Curve Approach. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(3), 233-247.

Eskin, S., Bachnak, R., & Wirick, D. (2018). A Summer Enrichment Program to Prepare Students for STEM Majors in College. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration (Vol. 2, pp. 7-2).

Fadilah, R. (2016). Buku Teks Bahasa Indonesia SMP dan SMA kurikulum 2013 Terbitan Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan 2014. Jurnal Pena Indonesia, 1(1), 26-49.

Fitriyadi, H. (2013). Integrasi Teknologi Informasi Komunikasi dalam Pendidikan: Potensi Manfaat, Masyarakat Berbasis Pengetahuan, Pendidikan Nilai, Strategi Implementasi dan Pengembangan Profesional. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan, 21(3), 269-284.

Goldhaber, D., Gratz, T., & Theobald, R. (2017). What’s in a Teacher Test? Assessing the Relationship between Teacher Licensure Test Scores and Student STEM Achievement and Course-Taking. Economics of Education Review, 61, 112-129.

Harland, D. J. (2011). STEM student research handbook. NSTA Press.

Hu, A., & Hibel, J. (2015). Where Do STEM Majors Lose Their Advantage? Contextualizing Horizontal Stratification of Higher Education in Urban China. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 41, 66-78.

Hu, H., & Garimella, U. (2014). iPads for STEM Teachers: A Case Study on Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Proficiency, Intention to Adopt, and Integration in K-12 Instruction. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange (JETDE), 7(1), 49-66.

Izzo, M. V., & Bauer, W. M. (2015). Universal Design for Learning: Enhancing Achievement and Employment of STEM students with Disabilities. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14(1), 17-27.

Khaeroningtyas, N., Permanasari, A., & Hamidah, I. (2016). STEM Learning in Material of Temperature and its Change to Improve Scientific Literacy of Junior High School. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(1), 94-100.

Knezek, G., Christensen, R., Tyler-Wood, T., & Periathiruvadi, S. (2013). Impact of Environmental Power Monitoring Activities on Middle School Student Perceptions of STEM. Science Education International, 24(1), 98-123.

Kozma, R. B. (2008). Comparative Analysis of Policies for ICT in Education. In International Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education (pp. 1083-1096). Springer, Boston, MA.

Muhson, A. (2010). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Teknologi Informasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia, 8(2), 1-10.

Osman, K., Hiong, L. C., & Vebrianto, R. (2013). 21st Century Biology: An Interdisciplinary Approach of Biology, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 102(2013), 188-194.

Pfeiffer, H. D., Ignatov, D. I., Poelmans, J., & Gadiraju, N. (2013). Conceptual Structures for STEM Research and Education. In 20th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS (pp. 10-12).

Quinn, C. (2000). mLearning: Mobile, Wireless, In-Your-Pocket Learning. Line Zine. Retrieved from http://www/linezine.com/2.1/features/Cqmmwiyp.htm

Rahman, A. A., Abdullah, Z., Mohammed, H., Zaid, N. M., & Aris, B. (2014). Flipped Classroom: Reviving Cognitive Development among School Students. In 3rd International Seminar on Quality and Affordable Education. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

Subekti, H., Taufiq, M., Susilo, H., Ibrohim, I., & Suwono, H. (2018). Mengembangkan Literasi Informasi melalui Belajar Berbasis Kehidupan Terintegrasi Stem untuk Menyiapkan Calon Guru Sains dalam Menghadapi Era Revolusi Industri 4.0: Revieu Literatur. Education and Human Development Journal, 3(1), 81-90.

Sudarsana, I. K. (2018). Optimalisasi Penggunaan Teknologi Dalam Implementasi Kurikulum Di Sekolah (Persepektif Teori Konstruktivisme). Cetta: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 1(1), 8-15.

Thibaut, L., Knipprath, H., Dehaene, W., & Depaepe, F. (2018). The Influence of Teachers’ Attitudes and School Context on Instructional Practices in Integrated STEM Education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 71(2018), 190-205.

Torlakson, T. (2011). A Blueprint for Great Schools: Transition Advisory Team Report. California Department of Education. Retrieved from https://www.cde.ca.gov/eo/in/bp/documents/yr11bp0709.pdf

Vinothkumar, A. (2018). Effectiveness of STEM Courseware Based on Edugame and Assistive Approach (Doctoral Dissertation, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia).

Wellington, J., & Osborne, J. (2001). Language and Literacy in Science Education. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).

Wibowo, I. G. A. W. (2018). Peningkatan Keterampilan Ilmiah Peserta Didik dalam Pembelajaran Fisika Melalui Penerapan Pendekatan STEM dan E-Learning. Journal of Education Action Research, 2(4), 315-321.

Yazdi, M. (2012). E-learning sebagai Media Pembelajaran Interaktif Berbasis Teknologi Informasi. Jurnal Ilmiah Foristek, 2(1), 143-152.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i1.16905

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share