PENGEMBANGAN PETUNJUK PRAKTIKUM GENETIKA UNTUK MELATIH KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR KRITIS

E. Susantini, M. Thamrin H., Isnawati -, L. Lisdiana

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mendeskripsikan kelayakan petunjuk praktikum genetika dan kunci yang telah dikembangkan. Jenis penelitian yang dilakukan adalah penelitian dan pengembangan dengan menggunakan Three DModels, yaitu Design, Define, dan Develop. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan petunjuk praktikum genetika dan kunci  memperoleh skor rerata ≥ 3,5 (rentang skala 1–4) yang dikategorikan layak secara teoritis. Keterbacaan Petunjuk praktikum genetika memperoleh rerata respon positif 89% yang dikategorikan sangat baik.

 

The purpose of this study is to describe the feasibility of genetics and the key lab instructions have been developed. This type of research is done is research and development using DModels Three, namely Design, Define, and Development. The results showed hint key lab of genetics and obtained a mean score ≥ 3.5 (scale range 1-4) are considered theoretically feasible. Practical tips genetics legibility obtain a positive response rates of 89% is considered very good.

Keywords

Practical Genetic clues; critical thinking

Full Text:

PDF

References

Arnyana,I.B.P.2004.Pengembangan Perangkat Model Belajar Berdasarkan Masalah Dipandu Strategi Kooperatif Serta Pengaruh Implementasinya Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas Pada Pelajaran Ekosistem. (Disertasi).Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.

Caroll, R. T. 2004. Becoming a Critical Thinker: A Guide for the New Millenium 2nd edition. San Fransisco: Pearson.

Ennis, R. H. 1993. Critical Thinking Assessment. Theory into Practice 32 (3): 179-186.

Fisher, A. 2001. Critical Thinking: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jez, J. M., et al., 2007. Developing a new interdisciplinary lab course for undergraduate and graduate students: Plant cells and proteins. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 35 (6): 410–415.

Kashdan, T. B., dan Silvia, P. J. 2008. Curiosity and Interest: The Benefits of Thriving on Novelty and Challenge. In C.R. Snyder and Shane J. Lopez, eds. Handbook of Positive Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Martens, T.R. & Hammersmith, R.L. 2004. Genetics Laboratory Investigations. New York: Macmillan Publishing.

Ong, A., Borich.eds. 2006. Teaching Strategies that Promote Thinking Models and Curriculum Approaches. Singapore: McGraw-Hill.

Rahayuningsih, E., dan Dwiyanto, D. 2005. Pembelajaran di Laboratorium. Yogyakarta: Pusat Pengembangan Pendidikan UGM.

Rudman, P. D., Lavelle, S. P., Salmon, G., and Cashmore, A. 2010. SWIFT-ly enhancin laboratory learning: genetics in virtual world. ALT-C-2010 Conference Proceedings pp. 118–128.

Santyasa, I.W. 2007. Pedoman Penyusunan Petunjuk Praktikum. Makalah disajikan dalam Workshop Media Pembelajaran bagi Guru-Guru SMA Negeri Banjar Angkan. Banjar, 10 Januari 2007.

Shute, V. J. 2007. Focus on Formative Feedback. Princeton: Educational Testing Service (ETS).

Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D.S. & Semmel, M.I. 1974. Instructional Development for Training Teachers of Exceptional Children. Source Book. Bloomington: Center for Innovtion on Teaching the Handicapped.

Woolfolk, A. 2006. Educational Psychology 10th Edition. New York: Pearson Inc.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v1i2.2126

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share