KETERAMPILAN ESENSIAL DAN KOMPETENSI MOTORIK LABORATORIUM MAHASISWA CALON GURU BIOLOGI DALAM KEGIATAN PRAKTIKUM EKOLOGI

Djohar Maknun, R. R. Hertien K Surtikanti, Achmad Munandar, S. Subahar

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengkaji profil keterampilan esensial dan kompetensi motorik lab mahasiswa calon guru biologi. Kenyataan data penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kompetensi keterampilan esensial lab mahasiswa masih rendah. Keterampilan esensial lab juga belum sepenuhnya diajarkan secara optimal dalam praktikum ekologi. Rata-rata tingkat penguasaan keterampilan esensial lab mahasiswa 35,50%, sedangkan kompetensi motorik lab-nya sebesar 59,6%.

 

The purpose of this study was to examine the profile of skills and competencies essential motor prospective teachers of biology lab students. Simple random sample is taken. The fact the data showed that the essential skills lab competency of students is still low. Essential skills lab is also not fully taught in the lab optimally ecology. The average level of student mastery of essential skills lab 35.50%, while the motor competence of his lab at 59.6%.

Keywords

essential skills lab, motor competence, practical ecology

Full Text:

PDF

References

Anggraeni, S. (2001). Analisis Pembelajaran Biologi Molekuler di SMU Kodya Bandung. Makalah Penelitian. Bandung: FMIPA UPI.

Carrol, S. and Feltam, M. (2007). Knowledge or Skills-The Way to a Meaningful Degree? An Investigation into Importance of Key Skills within an Undergraduate Degree and The Effect This on Student Success. Bioscience Education e-journal 10.

D’Avanzo C. (2003). Research on Learning: Potential for Improving College Ecology Teaching. Front Ecol Environment. 1(10):533-540.

Ford, E. D. (2000). Scientific Method for Ecological Research. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Gibb, J. (2002). The Collection of Research Reading on Generic Skill in VET [online]. Tersedia: http://www.ncvr.edu.au.hotm. [17 Nopember 2008].

Haigh, M., (1996). Investigating Investigatorrs: Implications for Teachesrs of theIntroduction of Open Investigations Into Form 6 (Year 12) Biology Practical Work. Paper Accompanying Presentation to 27th Annual Conference of The Australian Science Education Research Association, Canberra.

Henry, N. W. (1975). Objectives of Laboratory Work. In: The Structure of Science Education, Australia: Longman.

Moore, R. (2007). What Do Students’ Behaviors and Performances in Lab Tell Us About Their Behaviors and Performances in Lecture – Portions of Introductory Biology Courses? Bioscene: Journal of College Biology Teaching. 33(1), 19-24.

Nur, M. (1996). Teori Pembelajaran IPA dan Hakekat Pendekatan Keterampilan Proses. Jakarta : Dikmenum.

Ottander, C, & Grelsson, G. (2006). Laboratory work: The Teachers’ Perspective. Journal of Biological Education. 40(3), 113-118.

Rustaman, N et al. (2003). Strategi Belajar Mengajar Biologi. Bandung: Jurusan Pendidikan Biologi UPI.

Rustaman N & Riyanto, A. (2003). Perencanaan dan Penilaian Praktikum di Perguruan Tinggi. Handout Program Applied Approach bagi Dosen Baru Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, 13-25 Januari 2003.

Semiawan, C. (1985). Pendekatan Keterampilan Proses. Jakarta : PT. Gramedia.

Sund, R.B. and Trowbridge, L.W. (1987). Teaching Science by Inquiry in The Secondary School. Ohio: A Bell & Howell Company.

Surya, M. (2003). Psikologi Pembelajaran dan Pengajaran. Bandumg: Pustaka Bani Buraisy.

Watson, R., Prieto, T., Dillon, S.J., (1995). The Effect of Practical Work on Students’ Understanding of Combustion. J. Research in Science Teaching. Vol 32, No. 5.

Wulan, A.R. (2003). Permasalahan yang Dihadapi dalam Pemberdayaan Praktikum Biologi di SMU dan Upaya Penanggulangannya. Tesis. Bandung: SPs UPI (tidak dipublikasikan).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v1i2.2131

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share