Developing a Tool to Assess Students’ Views of Nature of Science in Vietnam

C. Yuenyong, T. P. Thao-Do

Abstract

Nature of Science (NOS) is a common topic in science education nowadays. However, the fact of the nature of science is not consensus through documents. The assessment of views of nature of science, therefore, was facing multi issues. Especially, in assessing views of NOS in a new context other than from where a validated tool was developed. Researchers and educators should notice certain issues relating to NOS. This paper will provide and discuss how to develop a more appropriate NOS tool to best use for Vietnamese Physics student teachers based on some previously validated tools and the empirical data from the research on the context. Instead of using a provided tool robotically, the paper calls for more critical employment of the tool based on the consideration of social and cultural context. This is not only important in the case of Vietnam but also any new circumstance.

 

Keywords

nature of science; instrument; Vietnam

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abdâ€Elâ€Khalick, F., & BouJaoude, S. (1997). An exploratory study of the knowledge base for science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 34(7), 673-699.

Aiemsum-ang, N., & Yuenyong, C. (2018, January). Thai in-service teacher understanding of nature of science in biology teaching: Case of Mali. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1923, No. 1, p. 030020). AIP Publishing LLC.

Aikenhead, G. S., & Ryan, A. G. (1992). The development of a new instrument:‘Views on Science—Technology—Society’(VOSTS). Science education, 76(5), 477-491.

Attapan, N., & Yuenyong, C. (2019, October). Explicit Nature of Science in the STS Contact Lens “Big Eyes†Unit. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1340, No. 1, p. 012066). IOP Publishing.

Bartos, S. A., & Lederman, N. G. (2014). Teachers’ knowledge structures for nature of science and scientific inquiry: Conceptions and classroom practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(9), 1150-1184.

Campanile, M. F., Lederman, N. G., & Kampourakis, K. (2015). Mendelian genetics as a platform for teaching about Nature of Science and Scientific Inquiry: The value of textbooks. Science & Education, 24(1-2), 205-225.

Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (1996). Educational research: An introduction. Longman Publishing.

Goff, P., Boesdorfer, S. B., & Hunter, W. (2012). Using a multicultural approach to teach chemistry and the nature of science to undergraduate non-majors. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7(3), 631-651.

Holliday, G. M., & G. Lederman, N. (2014). Informal science educators’ views about nature of scientific knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 4(2), 123-146.

Lederman, N. G. (2014). Nature of science and its fundamental importance to the vision of the next generation science standards. Science and Children, 52(1), 8.

Lederman, N. G., Antink, A., & Bartos, S. (2014). Nature of science, scientific inquiry, and socio-scientific issues arising from genetics: A pathway to developing a scientifically literate citizenry. Science & Education, 23(2), 285-302.

Lederman, N. G., Bartos, S. A., & Lederman, J. S. (2014). The development, use, and interpretation of nature of science assessments. In International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 971-997). Springer, Dordrecht.

Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2012). Nature of scientific knowledge and scientific inquiry: Building instructional capacity through professional development. In Second international handbook of science education (pp. 335-359). Springer, Dordrecht.

Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2015). The status of preservice science teacher education: A global perspective.

Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2014). Is Nature of Science Going, Going, Going, Gone?. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25, 235-238.

Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2014). Research on teaching and learning of nature of science. In Handbook of research on science education, volume II (pp. 614-634). Routledge.

Lederman, N. G., Lederman, J. S., & Antink, A. (2013). Nature of science and scientific inquiry as contexts for the learning of science and achievement of scientific literacy. International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology, 1(3), 138-147.

Lederman, J. S., Lederman, N. G., Kim, B. S., & Ko, E. K. (2012). Teaching and learning of nature of science and scientific inquiry: Building capacity through systematic research-based professional development. In Advances in nature of science research (pp. 125-152). Springer, Dordrecht.

McComas, W. F. (2015). The nature of science & the next generation of biology education. The American Biology Teacher, 77(7), 485-491.

McComas, W. F., & Kampourakis, K. (2015). Using the history of biology, chemistry, geology, and physics to illustrate general aspects of nature of science. Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT education, 9(1), 47-76.

McComas, W. F., & Nouri, N. (2016). The nature of science and the next generation science standards: Analysis and critique. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 27(5), 555-576.

Pagsangkanae, P., Apitanagotinon, R., Wongsila, S., & Yuenyong, C. (2019, March). Developing the explicit: Nature of science genetically modified organisms (GMOs) unit through 5Es learning. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2081, No. 1, p. 030029). AIP Publishing LLC.

Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Abdâ€elâ€Khalick, F. (2012). A series of misrepresentations: A response to Allchin’s whole approach to assessing nature of science understandings. Science Education, 96(4), 685-692.

Srisawat, A., Aiemsum-ang, N., & Yuenyong, C. (2018, January). A Thai pre-service teacher’s understanding of nature of science in biology teaching. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1923, No. 1, p. 030047). AIP Publishing LLC.

Sumranwanich, W., Art-in, S., Maneechom, P., & Yuenyong, C. (2016). Existing Nature of Science Teaching of a Thai In-Service Biology Teacher. Chemistry: Bulgarian Journal of Science Education, 25(3), 394-405.

Sumranwanich, W., & Yuenyong, C. (2014). Graduate students’ concepts of nature of science (NOS) and attitudes toward teaching NOS. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 2443-2452.

Taylor, P. C., Taylor, E. L., & Luitel, B. C. (2012). Multi-paradigmatic transformative research as/for teacher education: An integral perspective. In Second international handbook of science education (pp. 373-387). Springer, Dordrecht.

Thao-Do, T. P., Bac-Ly, D. T., & Yuenyong, C. (2016). Learning environment in Vietnamese physics teacher education programme through the lens of constructivism: a case study of a state university in Mekong delta region, Vietnam. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(1), 55-79.

Thao-Do, T. P., & Yuenyong, C. (2017). Dilemmas in examining understanding of nature of science in Vietnam. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 12(2), 255-269.

Warasith, C., Yuenyong, C., & Sranamkam, T. (2019, March). Khamnadeepittayakom science teachers’ concepts of nature of science (NOS) and attitudes toward teaching NOS. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2081, No. 1, p. 030031). AIP Publishing LLC.

Yuenyong, C., & Thao-Do, T. P. (2015). The outcomes of workshop for introduced view of nature of science to Vietnamese science teachers in Mekong delta region of Vietnam. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2), 599.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.