The Relationship of Students’ Thinking Level and the Ability to Develop Proposition Network Representation of Human Nervous System in Modeling Based Learning (MbL)
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adodo, S. O. (2013). Effect of mind-mapping as a self-regulated learning strategy on students’aAchievement in basic science and technology. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4(6), 163-172.
Arikunto, S. (2012). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Balim, A. G. (2013). The effect of mind-mapping applications on upper primary students’ success and inquiry-learning skills in science and environment education. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 22(4), 337-352.
Bergey, B., Cromley, J., Kirchgessner, M., and Newcombe, N. (2015). Using diagrams versus text for spaced restudy: Effects on learning in 10thgrade biology classes. British Journal of Education Psychology, 85(1), 59 – 74.
Buzan, T. (2011). Buku pintar mind map. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Cavalho, J., Beltramini, L., and Bossolan, N. (2018). Using a board game to teach protein synthesis to high school students. Journal of Biological Education. 53(2),205-216.
Cheng, M. & Gilbert, J. (2015). Students’ visualization of diagrams representing the human circulatory system: the use of spatial isomorphism and representational conventions. International Journal of Science Education, 37(1), 136 – 161.
Fatiha, M., Rahmat, A., Solihat, R. (2017). High school students’ propotional network representation when interpreting convention diagrams. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series, 895, 1-9.
Gilbert, J. K. & Justi, R. (2016). Modeling based teaching. Switzerland: Springer.
Goff, E. E., Reindl, K. M., Johnson, C., McClean, P., Offerdahl, E. G., Schroeder, N. L., & White, A. R. (2017). Variation in external representations as part of the classroom lecture: an investigation of virtual cell animations in introductory photosynthesis instruction. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 45(3), 226-234.
Heijes, D., vanJoolingen, W., & Leenars, F. (2017). Stimulating scientific reasoning with drawingbased modeling. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27, 45-56.
Heong, Y. M., Othman, W. B., Yunos, J. B. M., Kiong, T. T., Hassan, R. B., & Mohamad, M. M. B. (2011). The level of marzano higher order thinking skills among technical education students. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 1(2), 121.
Hidayat, T., Rahmat, A., Redjeki, S., Rahman, T., & Putra. A. (2019). The ability of scientific reasoning of students with drawing based modeling. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series, 1157, 1-6.
Jansen, S., Knippels, M. C. P. J., & van Joolingen, W. R. (2019). Assesing students’ understanding of models of biological processes : a revised framework. International Journal of Science Education, 41(8), 981-994.
Jong, J. J., Chiu, M. H. & Chung, S. L. (2015). The use of modeling based text to improve students’ modeling competencies. Science Education, 99(5), 986–1018.
Kragten, M., Admiraal, W., and Rijlaarsdam, G. (2014). Students’ ability to solve proces-diagram problems in secondary education. Journal of Biological Education,49(1), 91-103.
Krell, M. & Kruger, D. (2017). University students’ meta-modeling knowledge. Research in Science & Techology Education, 35(3), 261-273.
Lee, Y. L. (2018). Nurturing critical thinking for implementation beyond the classroom: Implications from social psychological theories of behavior change. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, 139-146.
Lestari, D., Mulyani, S. E. S., & Susanti, R. (2016). Pengembangan perangkat blended learning sistem saraf manusia untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 5(1), 83 – 93.
Long, D. & Carlson, D. (2011). Mind the map: How thinking maps affect student achievement. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 13(2), 1-7.
Louca, L. T., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2012). Modelingbased learning in science education: cognitive, metacognitive, social, concept and epistemological contributions. Educational Review, 64(4), 471-492.
Louca, L. T., Zacharia, Z. C. & Constantinou, P. (2011). In quest of productive modeling based learning discourse in elementary school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(8),919 – 951.
Marzano, R. J. & Heflebower, T. (2011). Grades that show what students know. Effective Grading PracticesPages, 69(3), 34-39.
Marzano, R. J. & Kendall, J. S. (2007). The new taxonomy of educational objectives. (2nd Ed). CA: Corwin Press.
Marzano, R. J. & Kendall, J. S. (2008). Designing and assessing educational objectives applying the new taxonomy. CA : Corwin Press.
Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D. & McTighe, J. (1993). Assessing student outcomes, performance, assessment using the dimension of learning.(5th Ed). NY: Longman.
Nichols, K. (2017). Impact of professional learning on teachers’ representational strategies and students’ cognitive engangement with molecular genetics concepts. Journal of Biological Education, 52(1), 31-46.
Olander, C., Wickman, P., Tyler, R., and Ingerman. A. (2017). Representations as mediation between purposes as junior secondary science students learn about the human body. International Journal of Science Education, 40(2), 204-226.
Paivio, A. (2014). Mind and its evolution: A dual coding theoretical approach. Psychology Press.
Peel, A., Zangori, L., Friedrichsen, P., Hayes, E. & Sadler, T. (2019). Students’ model-based explanations about natural selection and antibiotic resisteance through socioscientific issues-based learning. International Journal of Science Education, 41(4), 1-23.
Sudjana. (2013). Metoda statistika. (Edisi ke-7). Bandung: Tarsito.
Sunyono, S., Leny, Y., & Muslimin, I. (2015). Supporting students in learning with multiple representation to improve student mental models on atomic structure concepts. Science Education International, 26(2), 104-125.
Van Meter, P., Cameron, C., and Waters, J. (2017). Effects of response prompts and diagram comprehension ability on text and diagram learning in a college biology course. Learning and Instruction, 49, 188 – 198.
Won, M., Yoon, H. & Treagust, D. (2014). Students’ learning strategies with multiple representations: explanations of human breathing mechanism. Science Education, 98(5), 840 – 866.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.