Analisis Tingkat Motivasi Siswa Dalam Pembelajaran IPA Model Advance Organizer Berbasis Proyek
Abstract
atur kemajuan (advance organizer) berbasis proyek. Sampel penelitian dipilih secara acak. Pada kelas eksperimen diterapkan model pembelajaran advance organizer berbasis proyek sedangkan pada kelas kontrol diterapkan pembelajaran langsung (direct instruction) tanpa advance organizer. Sebelum pembelajaran di kelas, siswa eksperimen dikelompokkan menjadi 8 kelompok yang terdiri atas 4 – 5 siswa. Setiap kelompok ditugaskan untuk merealisasikan proyek bel listrik, rangkaian arus seri – paralel, dan tuas. Produk proyek digunakan dalam pembelajaran dikelas sebagai advance organizer. Data diperoleh melalui observasi partisipatif, penilaian produk, peta konsep, laporan eksperimen, dan angket. Instrumen motivasi menggunakan skala motivasi ARCS. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kelas eksperimen memiliki tingkat motivasi lebih baik dalam aspek perhatian, relevansi, kepercayaan diri, dan kepuasan pembelajaran dengan rata – rata tingkat motivasi sebesar 77,20, sedangkan tanpa advance organizer berbasis proyek sebesar 71,10. Disarankan siswa diberikan kemandirian penuh dalam proyek.
This study was conducted to analyze the level of student motivation in learning science through models of advance organizer based project . Samples were selected at random . In the experimental class advance organizer applied learning model based on a class project while learning control direct instruction without advance organizer . Prior learning in the classroom , students are grouped into 8 experimental groups consisting of 4-5 students . Each group was assigned a project to realize an electric bell , the circuit current series - parallel , and lever . Products used in a learning class project as advance organizer . The data obtained through participant observation , assessment product , concept maps , experimental reports , and questionnaires . Motivation instrument using ARCS motivation scale . Results showed that the experimental class had better motivation level in aspects of attention , relevance , confidence , and satisfaction with the learning average - average motivation level of 77.20 , whereas without the advance organizer for project -based 71.10 . It is recommended students are given full independence in the project .
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Apriono, D. 2009. Advance Organizer: Konsep, Komponen Model, dan Implementasi dalam Pembelajaran PPKn. Prospektus. Vol. 7 (2): 123-134.
Aziz, A. 2009. Model Advance Organizer dan Penerapannya dalam Pembelajaran. Jurnal Ta’allum. Vol. 19 (1): 34–44.
Bagheri, M., Ali, W.Z.W., Chong, M., Daud, S.M. 2013. Effect of Project Based Learning Strategy on Self-Directed Learning Skills of Educational Technology Students. Contemporary Educational Technology. Vol. 4 (1): 15-19.
Bahri, S., Aprian, E. 2008. Peran Pengetahuan Awal, Strategi Kognitif dan Metakognitif terhadap Pencapaian Hasil Belajar IPA. Jurnal Serambi Ilmu. Vol. 6 (1): 58–64.
Barnes, B.R. and Clawson, E. U. 1975. Do Advance Organizer Facilitate Learning? Recommendation for Further Research Based on an Analysis of 32 Studies. Review of Education Research. Vol. 45 (4): 637-659.
Bartscher, K., Gould, B., & Nutter, S. 1995. “Increasing student motivation through project-based learning”. Summary of Research on Project Based Learning. Indianapolis: Center of Excellence in Leadership of Learning, University of Indianapolis.
Box, J. A. & Little, D. C. 2003. Cooperative Small-Group Instruction Combined with Advanced Organizers and Their Relationship to Self-Concept and Social Studies Achievement of Elementary School Students. Journal of Instructional Psychology. Vol. 30: 285-287.
Cennamo, K., Brandt, C., Scott, B., Douglas., McGrath, M. 2011. Managing The Complexity Of Design Problems Through Studio-Based Learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning. Vol. 5 (2): 12 – 36.
Cotton, K. 2001. “Teaching Thinking Skills.” Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory. Chicago: School Improvement Research Series.
Daniel, K. J. 2005. Advance organizers: Activating and Building Schema for more Successful learning in students with disabilities. Lynchburg College Journal Special Education. Vol. 201 (4): 1–22.
Dhindsa, H.S., Kasim, M., Anderson, O.R. 2010. Constructivist-Visual Mind Map Teaching Approach and the Quality of Students’ Cognitive Structures. Jurnal Science Education Technology. DOI 10.1007/s10956-010-9245-4, Hal 1-15.
Efendi, R. 2010. “Kemampuan Fisika Siswa Indonesia dalam TIMMS (Trend of International on Mathematics and Science Study).” Prosiding Seminar Fisika 2010 (Online). http:/www.fi.itb.ac.id (diunduh 4 Oktober 2012)
Hamilton, L. C. 1985. The Retentive Effects of Advance Organizers. Journal of Studies in Education. Vol. 1 (1): 112-118.
Ivie, S. D. 1998. Ausubel’s Learning Theory : An Approaching To Teaching Higher Order Thinking Skills. Educational Psychologist David Paul Ausubel. High School Journal. Vol. 82 (1): 1 -40.
Jong, T. D., Fergusson, M. G. M. 1986. Cognitive Structures of Good and Poor Novice Problem Solvers in Physics. Journal of Educational Psychology. Vol. 78 (4): 278–288.
Keraro, F. N., Wachanga, S. W., & Orora, W. 2007. Effects of Cooperative Concept Mapping Teaching Approach on Secondary School Students Motivation in Biology, Gucha District, Kenya. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. Vol. 5: 111-124.
Lawson, A.E. 1995. Science Teaching and the Development of Thingking. California: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Lin, H., Kidwai, K., Swain, J., Ausman, B., Dwyer, F. 2005. The Effect of Verbal Advance Organizers in Complementing Animated Instruction. Journal of Visual Literacy. Vol. 25 (2): 237-248.
Marshall, S.P. 2007. Schemas In Problem Solving. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Nelson, R. M. 2000. Motivation to Learn Science: Differences Related to Gender. Journal of Educational Research. Vol. 93 (4): 245–255.
OECD. 2012. PISA 2009 Technical Report. PISA: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Publishing.
Oloyede, O.I. 2011. A Meta-analysis of Effects of the Advance Organizers on Acknowledgment and Retention of Senior secondary School (SSS) Chemistry. International Journal Education Science. Vol. 3 (2): 129-135.
Panggabean, D. D. & Suyanti, R. D. 2012. Analisis Pemahaman Konsep Awal dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Bidang Studi Fisika Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Advance Organizer dan Model Pembelajaran Direct Instruction. Jurnal Online Pendidikan Fisika. Vol. 1(2): 13 – 20.
Rahayu, S. 2012. Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Advance Organizer Untuk Meningkatkan Aktivitas Dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pokok Bahasan Koloid. Journal of Innovative Science Education. Vol. 1 (1): 29-35.
Shihusa, H., and Keraro, F.N. 2009. Using Advance Organizers to Enhance Students’ Motivation in Learning Biology. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education. Vol. 5 (4): 413-420.
Solomon, J. 1986. Motivation for learning science. The School Science Review.Vol. 67 (240): 436-442.
Tasiwan. 2013. Peningkatan Motivasi dan Hasil Belajar Siswa melalui Pendekatan Peta Konsep Konstruktivisme. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia. Vol. 2 (1): 20–25.
Tella, A. 2007. The Impact of Motivation on Student’s Academic Achievement and Learning Outcomes in Mathematics among Secondary School Students in Nigeria. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. Vol. 3 (2): 149–156.
Titin, Sunarno, W., Masykuri, M. 2012. Pembelajaran Biologi Menggunakan Model Sains Teknologi Masyarakat (STM) Berbasis Proyek Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Dan Sikap Peduli Lingkungan . Jurnal Inkuiri. Vol. 1 (3): 245–257.
Vrasidas, C. 2000. Constructivism Versus Objectivism : Implications for Interaction, Course Design, and Evaluation in Distance Education. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications. Vol. 6 (4): 339-362.
Wasis, P. 2008. Penerapan Metode Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek Untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran Praktik Industri Pada Prodi S-1 PTB. Jurnal Penelitian Kependidikan. Tahun 18 No. 1: 204–215.
Willerman, M. & Mac Harg, R. A. 1992. The Concept Map as an Advance Organizer. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Vol. 28: 705-712.
Yalcin, S.A., Turgut, U., Buyukkasap, E. 2009. The Effect of Project Based Learning on Science Undergraduates’ Learning of Electricity, Attitude towards Physics and Scientific Process Skills. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences. Vol. 1 (1): 81-105.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
