THE PROFILE OF ARGUMENTATION SKILL USING “TOULMIN ARGUMENTATION PATTERN” ANALYSIS IN THE ARCHIMEDES PRINCIPAL ON THE STUDENTS OF SMA KOTA BANDAR LAMPUNG

V. Viyanti

Abstract

This research aims to indentify student’s argumentation skill which is seen from argumentation discourse and then it is analyzed using TAP (Toulmin Argumentation Pattern) which consists of some components such as data, claim, warrant, backing and rebuttal on the topic of Archimedes Principle. The method used in this research is descriptive method. The result of this research shows based on the written assignment, the student’s scientific argumentation skill is not good. The student often do not use an appropriate argumentation, do not use adequate evidence, or try to straighten their own option or try to apply their own argument.

Keywords

Argumentation Skill; Toulmin Argumentation Pattern “TAP”; Archimedes Principle.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Aufschnaiter, V. A., Eduran, S., Osborne, J., Simon, S., 2007. Argumentation and The Learning of Science Dalam Pinto R., Causo, D (Eds), Contribution for Science Education Research.

Berland, B. J. 2008. Making Sense of Argumentation and Explanation. Science Education. 93:26–55.

Driver, R., Newton, P., Osborne, J. 2000. Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education. 84: 287–312.

Duschl, R., & Osborne, J. 2002. Supporting and Promoting Argumenation Discourse. Studies in Science Education. 38: 39–72.

Eemeren, V., Houtlosser, P., Henkemans, A. 2007. Indicators of starting points for discussion. Dalam Emeren (Eds). Argumentative Indicators in Discourse.

Erduran, S.J, Simon, O.S. 2004. The Role of Argumentation in Developing Scientific Literacy. Research and The Quality of Science Education.

Farida, I. dan Gusniarti, W.F. 2014. Profil Keterampilan Argumentasi Siswa Pada Konsep Koloid Yang Dikembangkan Melalui Pembelajaran Inkuiri Argumentatif. Edusains. 6 (1): 32 – 40.

Hogan, K., & Maglienti, M. 2001. Comparing the epistemological underpinnings of students' and scientists' reasoning about conclusions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 38 (6): 663-687.

Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. & Erduran, S. 2008. Argumenation In Science Education. Perspectives from Classroom-Based Research. Science. 3-27.

Kuhn, D. 1993. Science as argumen: Implications for teaching and learning scientipic thinking.

Lawson, A.E. 2003. The nature and development of hypothetico-predictive argumentation with implications for science teaching. International Journal of Science Education. 25 (11): 1387-1408.

Manurung, S.R. 2012. Identifikasi Keterampilan Argumentasi melalui Analisis “Toulmin Argumenation Pattern (TAP)” Pada Topik Kinematik Bagi Mahasiswa Calon Guru. Seminar & Rapat Tahunan BKS-PTN B Tahun 2012.

Osborne, J., Erduran, S. & Simon, S. 2004. Enhancing the quality of argument in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 41(10): 994-998.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v4i1.3506

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share