The Scientific Questioning and Experimental Skills of Elementary School Students: The Intervention of Research-Based Learning
Abstract
Research-based learning is a learning strategy that encourages the use of scientific inquiry, thereby allowing students to develop an understanding of the scientific process. The aim of this study was to design a research-based, scientific learning activity on the topic of the mass and volume of matter, to be implemented with elementary school students. The study sample consisted of 16 fourth-grade students selected by purposive sampling. This mixed methods study, performed as an embedded design, examined the pre-experimental results of this research-based learning activity on students’ scientific questioning and experimental skills. The science process skills evaluation form was used as a quantitative instrument. The quantitative data were analyzed by simple statistics including mean and standard deviation. Meanwhile, the gathering of qualitative data was accomplished through the taking of field notes. Deductive analysis was employed to highlight the patterns that emerged regarding the students’ science process skills. The findings revealed that this research-based learning design encouraged students’ scientific questioning and experimental skills, with the mean level being at the developing level. This was achieved by giving students the opportunity to engage in challenging, age-appropriate activities with explicit scientific methodology guidance provided by their teachers. Furthermore, it was found that the students were very much satisfied with this research-based learning activity. This suggests that incorporating research-based practices would serve to fulfill the educational aims of the science classroom. The science inquiry-based approach represents an area worthy of increased focus in order to encourage elementary school students to practice science process skills.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Artayasa, I., Muhlis, M., Merta, I., & Hadiprayitno, G.
(2021). The effects of guided inquiry learning with the assistance of concept maps on students' scientific literacy. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7(2), 262-268.
Artayasa, I. P., Susilo, H., Lestari, U., & Indriwati, S.
E. (2017). The effectiveness of the three levels of inquiry in improving teacher training students’ science process skills. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(6), 908-918.
Brew, A., & Saunders, C. (2020). Making sense of
research-based learning in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 87, 1-11.
Can, B., Yıldız-Demirtaş, V., & Altun, E. (2017). The
effect of project-based science education programme on scientific process skills and conceptions of kindergarten students. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(3), 395-413.
Cairns, D. (2019). Investigating the relationship
between instructional practices and science achievement in an inquiry-based learning environment. International Journal of Science Education, 41(15), 2113-2135.
Chin, C., & Kayalvizhi, G. (2002). Posing problems for
open investigations: what questions do pupils ask? Research in Science & Technological Education, 20(2), 269-287.
Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2008). Students' questions: A
potential resource for teaching and learning science. Studies in Science Education, 44(1), 1-39.
Di Mauro, M. F., & Furman, M. (2016). Impact of
an inquiry unit on grade 4 students’ science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 38(14), 2239-2258.
Durmaz, H., & Mutlu, S. (2017). The effect of an
instructional intervention on elementary students' science process skills. The Journal of Educational Research, 110(4), 433-445.
Faikhamta, C., Ketsing, J., Tanak, A., & Chamrat, S.
(2018). Science teacher education in Thailand: A challenging journey. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 4(1), 3.
Fischhoff, B. (2019). Evaluating science communication.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(16), 7670-7675.
Fitzgerald, M., Danaia, L., & McKinnon, D. H. (2019).
Barriers inhibiting inquiry-based science teaching and potential solutions: Perceptions of positively inclined early adopters. Research in Science Education, 49(2), 543-566.
Guidotti, T. L. (2016). Communication in Science.
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 102(3), 23-36.
Huang, X., Lederman, N. G., & Cai, C. (2017). Improv-
ing Chinese junior high school students’ ability to ask critical questions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(8), 963-987.
Huet, I. (2018). Research-based education as a model to
change the teaching and learning environment in STEM disciplines. European Journal of Engineering Education, 43(5), 725-740.
Kalthoff, B., Theyssen, H., & Schreiber, N. (2018).
Explicit promotion of experimental skills. And what about the content-related skills? International Journal of Science Education, 40(11), 1305-1326.
Khumraksa, B., & Ruksakit, P. (2019). Improvement of
science process skills by using research–based instruction on soil properties for the 2nd grade students in a municipal school, Surat Thani. Journal of Research Unit on Science, Techno-logy and Environment for Learning, 10(1), 14-29.
Kloser, M. J., Brownell, S. E., Shavelson, R. J., &
Fukami, T. (2013). Effects of a research-based ecology lab course: A study of non-volunteer achievement, self-confidence, and perception of lab course purpose. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(3), 72-81.
Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2015). Practical Research:
Planning and Design. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Metcalfe, J. (2017). Learning from errors. Annual
Review of Psychology, 68(1), 465-489.
Ministry of Education Thailand. (2017). The basic edu-
cation core curriculum B.E. 2551 (A.D. 2008) and revised in B.E. 2560 (A.C. 2017). Bangkok: Agricultural Co-operative Federa-tion of Thailand Ltd.
Noguez, J., & Neri, L. (2019). Research-based Learning:
A case study for engineering students. Interna-tional Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, 13(4), 1283-1295.
Nworgu, L. N., & Otum, V. V. (2013). Effect of guided
inquiry with analogy instructional strategy on students acquisition of science process skills. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(27), 35-40.
Nyutu, E. N., Cobern, W. W., & Pleasants, B. A. S.
(2021). Correlational study of student percept-ions of their undergraduate laboratory environment with respect to gender and major. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology, 9(1), 83-102.
Özgelen, S. (2012). Students’ science process skills
within a cognitive domain framework. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 8(4), 293-292.
Oztas Cin, M., & Yurumezoglu, K. (2020). A suggested
activity to develop integrated skills and a love of nature in children. Science Activities, 57(2), 58-66.
Pimentel, J. (2010). A note on the usage of Likert scaling
for research data analysis. USM R&D Journal 18(2), 109-112.
Reinagel, A., & Bray Speth, E. (2016). Beyond the cen-
tral dogma: Model-based learning of how genes determine phenotypes. CBE–Life Sciences Education, 15(1), 1-15.
Rokos, L., & Martincová, K. (2020, 5th – 6th November).
Pupils’ creativity in designing their own experiment within inquiry task in Biology lesson. Paper presented at the Project-based education and other activating strategies in science education XVIII., Prague, Czech Republic.
Rokos, L., & Zavodska, R. (2020). Efficacy of inquiry-
based and “cookbook” labs at human physio-logy lessons at university level–Is there an impact in relation to acquirement of new knowledge and skills? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Edu-cation, 16(12), 1-13.
Sadeh, I., & Zion, M. (2012). Which type of inquiry
project do high school biology students prefer: Open or guided? Research in Science Edu-cation, 42(5), 831-848.
Schwichow, M., Brandenburger, M., & Wilbers, J.
(2022). Analysis of experimental design errors in elementary school: how do students identify, interpret, and justify controlled and confounded experiments? International Journal of Science Education, 44(1), 91-114.
Sholahuddin, A., Yuanita, L., Supardi, Z. A. I., &
Prahani, B. K. (2020). Applying the cognitive style-based learning strategy in elementary schools to improve students’ science process skills. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(2), 289-301.
Sideri, A., & Skoumios, M. (2021). Science process
skills in the Greek primary school science textbooks. Science Education International, 32(3), 231-236.
Subali, B., Kumaidi, Aminah, N. S., & Sumintono, B.
(2019). Student achievement based on the use of scientific method in the natural science subject in elementary school. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(1), 41-53.
Szalay, L., & Tóth, Z. (2016). An inquiry-based
approach of traditional ‘step-by-step’ experi-ments. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(4), 923-961.
Szalay, L., Tóth, Z., & Kiss, E. (2020). Introducing
students to experimental design skills. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(1), 331-356.
Tomasik, J. H., LeCaptain, D., Murphy, S., Martin, M.,
Knight, R. M., Harke, M. A., et al. (2014). Island explorations: Discovering effects of environmental research-based lab activities on analytical chemistry students. Journal of Chemical Education, 91, 1887–1894.
Turner, R. C., & Carlson, L. (2003). Indexes of item-
objective congruence for multidimensional items. International Journal of Testing, 3(2), 163-171.
Vogel, S., & Schwabe, L. (2016). Learning and memory
under stress: Implications for the classroom. npj Science of Learning, 1(1), 16011.
Vossen, T. E., Henze, I., Rippe, R. C. A., Van Driel,
J. H., & De Vries, M. J. (2018). Attitudes of secondary school students towards doing research and design activities. International Journal of Science Education, 40(13), 1629-1652.
Winkelmann, K., Baloga, M., Marcinkowski, T., Gian-
noulis, C., Anquandah, G., & Cohen, P. (2015). Improving students’ inquiry skills and self-efficacy through research-inspired modules in the general chemistry laboratory. Journal of Chemical Education, 92, 247–255.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
