Challenges Faced by Students in Answering Biology Essay Questions in the English Language
Abstract
Effective writing abilities are essential for science students to articulate their thoughts and critical thinking, enabling the assessment of their scientific knowledge progression. This study aims to uncover the challenges Malaysian Higher School Certificate (STPM) students face in answering Biology essay questions in English. Using a document analysis approach, examiners’ feedback from 27 STPM Biology Candidate Reports of essay questions spanning 2013 to 2021 were inductively analyzed. Thematic analysis unveiled the challenges faced by students in answering Biology essay questions in English. The analysis reveals two primary hurdles faced by STPM Biology students. The most substantial challenge pertains to the ‘content’, followed by ‘content and language’. Deficiencies in scientific comprehension and principles were evident within the ‘content’ category. In ‘content and language’, students needed help to compose English responses. Factors like ‘technical term’, content, language, and technical term’, ‘language’, and ‘technical term and language’ held little significance. Intriguingly, ‘content and technical term’ posed the least difficulty; inaccuracies in specialized vocabulary usage caused confusion and point deductions. These findings highlight the substantive challenges STPM Biology students face in the domain of natural science education. The study underscores that prevalent issues addressing STPM Biology essay questions revolve around insufficient content coverage and limited English proficiency. Addressing these challenges and devising instructional strategies to bolster content comprehension and language skills within the natural science context proves pivotal. By tackling these issues, educators and policymakers can cultivate a more supportive and effective learning environment for STPM Biology students.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ali, M., & Ismail, Z. (2006). Comprehension level of non-technical terms in science: are we ready for science in English. Malaysian Journal of Educators and Education, 21, 73-83.
Amalia, H., Abdullah, F., & Fatimah, A. S. (2021). Teaching writing to junior high school students: A focus on challenges and solutions. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(S2), 794-810.
Ahmed Shafi, A., Hatley, J., Middleton, T., Millican, R., & Templeton, S. (2018). The role of assessment feedback in developing academic buoyancy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(3), 415-427.
Akaygun, S., & Aslan-Tutak, F. (2016). STEM Images Revealing STEM Conceptions of Pre-Service Chemistry and Mathematics Teachers. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 4(1), 56-71.
Bada, S. O., & Olusegun, S. (2015). Constructivism Learning Theory: A Paradigm for Teaching and Learning. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 5(6), 66-70.
Black, P. (2013). Formative and summative aspects of assessment: Theoretical and research foundations in the context of pedagogy. In H. J. McMillian(Ed.), Research on Classroom Assessment (pp. 167–178). London: Sage
Boyatziz, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Bruna, K. R., Vann, R. & Escudero, M. P. (2007). What’s language got to do with it?: A case study of academic language instruction in a high school ‚English Learner Science’ class. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(1), 36-54.
Bustami, Y., Syafruddin, D., & Afriani, R. (2018). The implementation of contextual learning to enhance biology students’ critical thinking skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(4), 451-457.
Çevik, M., & Özgünay, E. (2018). STEM Education through the Perspectives of Secondary Schools Teachers and School Administrators in Turkey. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 4(2), 91-101.
Choy, S. C., & San Oo, P. (2012). Reflective thinking and teaching practices: A precursor for incorporating critical thinking into the classroom? International Journal of Instruction, 5(1), 167–182.
Crandall, J., Bernache, C., & Prager, S. (1998). New Frontiers in Educational Policy and Program Development: The Challenge of the Underschooled Immigrant Secondary School Student. Educational Policy, 12(6), 719-734.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Fourth ed. Lincoln: Sage.
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140.
Dirksen, D. J. (2011). Hitting the reset button: Using formative assessment to guide instruction. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(7), 26-31.
Dixon, H. (2008). Feedback for Learning: Deconstructing Teacher’s Conceptions and Use of Feedback. Aukland: University of Auckland.
Emig, J. (1977). Writing as a mode of learning. College composition and communication, 28(2), 122–128.
Freihofner, U. (2021). Sense-making and learning in the 21st century: Science student voices on learning through a second language [Doctoral dissertation, University Of Queensland, Australia].
Hedge, T. (2001). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hyland, K. (2003). Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(1), 17–29.
Issa, T., Isaias, P., & Issa, T. (2014). Does MP3 audio feedback enhance students’ learning skills? An international case study. The International Journal of Learning, 19, 15-28.
Johnson, E., & Jenkins, J. (2009). Formative and summative assessment: How outcomes inform instruction and educational practices. Retrieved December 4, 2014, from https://www.education.com/reference/article/formative-and-summative-assessment/
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2018). Tingkatan Enam. Retrieved from https://www.moe.gov.my/index.php/my/tingkatan-enam
Kim, S. L., & Kim, D. (2021). English learners’ science-literacy practice through explicit writing instruction in invention-based learning. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2, 100029.
Kong, S. (2014). Collaboration between content and language specialists in late immersion. Canadian Modern Language Review, 70(1), 103–122.
Lo, Y. Y. (2014). Collaboration between L2 and content subject teachers in CBI: Contrasting beliefs and attitudes. RELC Journal, 45(2), 181–196.
Lopes, A. (2020). Linking Content and Language-Integrated Learning (CLIL) and Task-based Language Teaching (TBLT) in an effective way: a methodological proposal. Onomázein: Revista de lingüística, filología y traducción de la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, (6), 5-22.
Miller, B. & Paola, S. (2005). Tell it slant: Writing and shaping creative nonfiction. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Motlagh, H. S., Khafaie, H., Arastoo, A. A., Cheraghi, M., & Khafaie, M. A. (2020). Application of social network in traditional sciences education on the vocabulary acquisition of secondary English learner students. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 3071-3085.
Musa, N. C., Lie, K. Y., & Azman, H. (2012). Exploring English language learning and teaching in Malaysia. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 12(1), 35-51.
Omar, Y. Z. (2019). Teaching Pedagogical Grammar in Context to Enrich English Language Learners’ Academic Writing. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 2(3), 213–225.
Oyoo, S. O. (2015). Why language is so important in science teaching. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2015/06/why-language-is-so-important-in-science-teaching/
Popham, W. J. (2008). Transformative Assessment. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Probosari, R. M. (2015). Improvement Of Students’ Scientific Writing Of Biology Education Of Sebelas Maret University Through Reading Project Based Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 4(1), 31-35.
Quitadamo, I. J., & Kurtz, M. J. (2007). Learning to Improve: Using Writing to Increase Critical Thinking Performance in General Education Biology. CBE – Life Sciences Education, 6(2), 140-154.
RAE. (2015). Increasing diversity and inclusion in Engineering – A case study tool kit. Retrieved from https://www.raeng.org.uk/publications/reports/increasing-diversity-and-inclusion-in-engineering.
Raitbauer, M., Fürstenberg, U., Kletzenbauer, P., & Marko, K. (2018). Towards a cognitive-linguistic turn in CLIL: Unfolding integration. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 11(1), 87-107.
Rand, J., (2017). Misunderstandings and mismatches: The collective disillusionment of written summative assessment feedback. Research in Education, 97(1), 33–48.
Reider, D., Knestis, K., & Malyn-Smith, J. (2016). Workforce education models for K-12 STEM education programs: Reflections on, and implications for, the NSF ITEST program. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(6), 847–858.
Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. W. (2013). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. New York: Routledge.
Rothwell, J. (2013). The hidden STEM economy. Washington DC: Metropolitan Policy Program at Brookings.
Sampson, V., Enderle, P., Grooms, J., & Witte, S. (2013). Writing to learn by learning to write during the school science laboratory: Helping middle and high school students develop argumentative writing skills as they learn core ideas. Science Education, 97(5), 643-670.
Schneider, G, C. (2021). CLIL teachers’ belief systems regarding grammar teaching and their teaching practices in an English full immersion private school in Chile [Master dissertation, Universidad Andrés Bello, Santiago, Chile].
Short, D. J. (2017). How to integrate content and language learning effectively for English language learners. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7b), 4237-4260.
Shokrpour, N., & Fallahzadeh, M. H. (2008). A survey of the students and interns’ EFL writing problems in Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. Asian EFL Journal, 9(1), 1–11.
Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Skolnick, D. (2000). More than meets the eye: How relationships enhance literacy learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Suwono, H., Pratiwi, H. E., Susanto, H., & Susilo, H. (2017).
Enhancement of students’ biological literacy and critical thinking of biology through socio-biological case-based learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(2), 213-220.
Tawafak, R. M., Romli, A. M., & Alsinani, M. J. (2019). Student assessment feedback effectiveness model for enhancing teaching method and developing academic performance. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education (IJICTE), 15(3), 75-88.
Ting, S. H., Marzuki, E., Chuah, K. M., Misieng, J., & Jerome, C. (2017). Employers’ views on the importance of English proficiency and communication skill for employability in Malaysia. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 315-327.
Torres, H. N., & Zeidler, D. L. (2002). The effects of English language proficiency and scientific reasoning skills on the acquisition of science current knowledge by Hispanic English language learners and native English language speaking students. European Journal of Science Education, 6(3), 1-59.
Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. W. (2013). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. New York: Routledge.
van Kampen, E., Meirink, J., Admiraal, W., & Berry, A. (2017). Do we all share the same goals for content and language-integrated learning (CLIL)? Specialist and practitioner perceptions of ‘ideal’ CLIL pedagogies in the Netherlands. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23(8), 855-871.
Vázquez, V. P. (2014). Enhancing the quality of CLIL: Making the best of the collaboration between language teachers and content teachers. Encuentro, 23, 115-127.
Viljoen, C. H. (2011). The Use of Grade Three External Assessment Results in Two Gauteng Public Schools to Improve Teaching and Learning. [Master dissertation, University of Witwatersrand, Education, Johannesburg].
Wees, D. (2010, March 31). DAVID WEES: Thoughts from a reflective educator. Retrieved May 7, 2013, from the role of immediacy of feedback in student learning: http://www.davidwees.com/content/role-imediacy-feedback-student-learning
Winstone, N. E., & Boud, D. (2022). The need to disentangle assessment and feedback in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 47(3), 656-667.
Yasuda, S. (2019). Conceptualizing Integration in CLIL: More Than Just Learning Content and. Japan Association for Language Teaching Journal, 41(1), 49–65.
Zheng, B., & Warschauer, M. (2017). Epilogue: Second language writing in the age of computer-mediated communication. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 61-67.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
