Electronic Portfolio Assessment Instruments in Improving Students' Creative Thinking Skills

T. Rahmawati, T. Mulyaningsih, N. Nahadi, H. Suhanda, W. K. Lee, H. A. Aziz, S. Anwar

Abstract

The objective of the study is to determine the stage of the process of developing electronic portfolio assessment instruments and obtain a valid and reliable electronic portfolio assessment instrument that can be used as an alternative effective assessment in improving students’ creative thinking on redox reaction materials. The research method employed was Research and Development (R&D) with a 4-D development model: define, design, develop, and disseminate. The data sources for this study were obtained from chemistry education lecturers, chemistry teachers, and eleventh-grade students in one of the high schools in Bandung. The instruments used in this study were interview guidelines, instrument content validation sheet, task assessment observation sheet, creative thinking skills assessment task and rubric, portfolio assessment rubric, pre-test and post-test questions and rubrics on chemical reaction equations that have tested for validity. The developed electronic portfolio assessment instrument was realized in a task and assessment rubric based on 21st-century creative thinking indicators. The results reveal that the developed electronic portfolio assessment instrument has good quality because it fulfils the valid requirements with a CVR value of 1.00 and fulfils the reliable requirements with a Cronbach Alpha value of 0.702-0.982. Electronic portfolios can be used as one of the assessment tools for science learning. The developed electronic portfolio assessment instrument may promote students’ creative thinking on redox reaction material based on the N-Gain 0.72 with the high category and has good effectiveness based on the N-Gain 0.61 with the medium category. Based on the category of mastery learning, the effectiveness is 9.66%.

Keywords

assessment; creative thinking; electronic portfolio

Full Text:

PDF

References

Aljamaeen, R., Abusail, R., Humiedan, M. M., Mansoor, M., Metwally, A. B., & Abouelnaga, H.M. (2020). The Effect of Using Edmodo in Teaching English Courses on Developing the Trend Towards 21st Century Skills Among English Courses’ Learners. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 14(9). 663–676.

Alshawi, S. T., & Alhomoud, F. A. (2016). The impact of using edmodo on saudi university EFL students’ motivation and teacher-student communication. International Journal of Education, 8(4), 105-121.

Apriadi, N. N. S., & Redhana, I. W. (2019). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa Kelas X pada Topik Reaksi Redoks. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia, 2(2), 70-77.

Arifin, Z. (2014). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Islam Kementerian Agama RI.

Arikunto, S. (2007). Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.

Arissaryadin, A., & Arimbawaa, P. (2020). Validitas Dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Efikasi Diri Petani. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Agribisnis (pp. 149-154).

Aziizah, A. N. (2021). Pengembangan Strategi Asesmen Berbasis Portofolio Elektronik untuk Meningkatkan Kreativitas Siswa pada Materi Konsep Mol. (Dissertation). Bandung: Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Balasubramanian, K., Jaykumar, V., & Fukey, L. N. (2014). A Study on “Student Preference towards the Use of Edmodo as a Learning Platform to Create Responsible Learning Environment.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 144, 416–422.

Bangalan, R. C., & Hipona, J. B. (2020). E-Portfolio: A potential e-learning tool to support student-centered learning, reflective learning and outcome-based assessment. Globus-An International Journal of Management and IT, 12(1), 32-37.

Beymer, P. N., & Thomson, M, M. (2015). The effects of choice in the classroom: Is there too little or too much choice? Support for Learning, 30(2). 105-120.

Bhatnagar, R., Kim, J., & Many, J. E. (2014). Candidate Surveys on Program Evaluation: Examining Instrument Reliability, Validity, and Program Effectiveness. American Journal of Educational Research, 2(8), 683 – 690.

Borrowski, T. (2019). The Battelle for Kids P21 Framework for 21st Century Learning. In P21 Partnership for 21st Century Learning. University of Illinois at Chicago.

Chambers, J. R. (2012). A comparative case study of factors distinguishing between high and low-performance on reading achievement in elementary rural Appalachian schools. Eastern Kentucky University.

Djonomiarjo, T. (2020). Pengaruh model problem based learning terhadap hasil belajar. Aksara: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Nonformal, 5(1), 39-46.

Dou, X., Li, H., & Jia, L. (2021). The linkage cultivation of creative thinking and innovative thinking in dance choreography. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41. 1–10.

Effendy, E. (2012). A- Level Chemistry: for Senior High School Student Volume 1B. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.

Effendy, I., & Abi Hamid, M. (2016). Pengaruh pemberian pre-test dan post-test terhadap hasil belajar mata diklat hdw. dev. 100.2. a pada siswa smk negeri 2 lubuk basung. VOLT: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Teknik Elektro, 1(2), 81-88.

Firman, H. (2013). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Firmansyah, S., Chandra, E., & Aripin, I. (2019). Pengembangan electronic portfolio ( e-portfolio ) sebagai assessment pembelajaran biologi. Jurnal Bio Education, 4(2), 47–57.

Florida, R., Mellander, C., & King, K. (2015). The global creativity index 2015. Martin Prosperity Institute.

Furqon, M., Sinaga, P., Liliasari, L., & Riza, L.S. The Impact of Learning Management System (LMS) Usage on Students. (2023). Technology, Education, Management, Informatics Journal, 12(2), 1082-1089.

Gamlem, S. M., & Munthe, E. (2014). Mapping the quality of feedback to support students’ learning in lower secondary classrooms. Cambridge Journal of Education, 44(1), 75-92.

Gentile, J. R., & Lalley, J. P. (2003). Standards and Mastery Learning: Aligning Teaching and Assessment so All Children Can Learn. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press, Inc.

Gultom, N. C., Hasibuan, A., & Gultom, C. R.. (2022). Komparasi Efektivitas Edmodo dengan Google Classroom Sebagai Media PJJ dalam Penugasan Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Asas : Jurnal Sastra, 11(1).

Hayati, S., & Lailatussaadah, L. (2016). Validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen pengetahuan pembelajaran aktif, kreatif dan menyenangkan (pakem) menggunakan model rasch. Jurnal Ilmiah Didaktika: Media Ilmiah Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 16(2), 169-179.

Ibda, H. (2019). Peningkatan Keterampilan Menulis Artikel Populer pada Mahasiswa Melalui Program Satu Mahasiswa Satu Karya (SAMA SAYA). Jurnal Nusa, 14(3), 405-416.

Idrus, L. (2019). Evaluasi dalam Proses Pembelajaran. Adaara: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 9(2), 920-935.

Jannah, R., & Rusmini. (2020). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Stad dengan Strategi Problem Posing untuk Melatih Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif Peserta Didik pada Materi Reaksi Redoks. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 14(2), 2665-2676.

Jannah, R. R., & Utami, L. (2019). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Materi Reaksi Redoks Menggunakan Certainty of Respond Indeks. Journal of The Indonesian Society of Integrated Chemistry, 10(2), 50–60.

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-Engagement Versus Traditional Methods: A Six-Thousand-Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74.

Glenn, C. W. (2013). Cognitive free will learning theory. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Elsevier, 97, 292 – 298.

Jatiningtyas, P. D. (2019). Pengembangan Penilaian Portofolio Untuk Menilai Kemampuan Berfikir Kreatif Siswa Kelas IV SD Negeri 2 Banjar Bali Kecamatan Buleleng Tahun Pelajaran 2018/2019. Guna Widya: Jurnal Pendidikan Hindu, 6(2), 68-79.

Joice, J., Gitomer, D., & Iaconangelo, C. (2018). Classroom assignments as measures of teaching quality. Learning and Instruction, 54, 48–61.

Juanengsih, N., Apriani, W., & Danial, M. A. (2018). Assessing Creativity of Senior High School Students in Learning Biology Using Online Portfolio Assessment on Facebook. Advances in Social Sciences, Education, and Humanities Research, 115(1), 83-88.

Juhanda, A., Wulan, A. R., & Fitriani, A. (2015). Pengembangan Asesmen Portofolio Elektronik (Ape) Dalam Menilai Sikap Ilmiah Dan Penguasaan Konsep Siswa Sma Pada Laporan Praktikum Pencemaran Lingkungan. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Biologi 2015, Yang Diselenggarakan Oleh Prodi Pendidikan Biologi FKIP Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, 4, 339–345.

Juwita, R., Utami, A. P., & Wijayanti, P. S. (2019). Pengembangan LKS berbasis pendekatan open-ended untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis siswa. Prima: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 35-43.

Kenedi, K. (2017). Pengembangan Kreativitas Siswa dalam Proses Pembelajaran di Kelas II SMP Negeri 3 Rokan IV Koto. Suara Guru, 3(2), 329-348.

Koraneekij, P., & Khlaisang, J. (2019). Students’ Beliefs Regarding The Use of E-Portfolio To Enhance Cognitive Skills in A Blended Learning Environment. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(2), 85.

Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A Quantitative Approach to Content Validity. Personnel Psychology, 28, 563–575.

Lou, S. (2017). A Study of Creativity in CaC 2 Steamship-derived STEM Project-based Learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 2387–2404.

Lu, H. (2021). Electronic Portfolios in Higher Education: A Review of the Literature. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 2(3), 96–101.

Mardhiyah, R. H., Aldriani, S. N. F., Chitta, F., & Zulfikar, M. R. (2021). Pentingnya keterampilan belajar di abad 21 sebagai tuntutan dalam pengembangan sumber daya manusia. Lectura: Jurnal Pendidikan, 12(1), 29-40.

Masluhah, M., & Afifah K. R. (2022). Electronic Portofolio Sebagai Instrumen Penilaian Pembelajaran Siswa di Era Digital. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(2), 1883-1896.

Meika, I., & Sujana, A. (2017). Kemampuan Berfikir Kreatif Dan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa SMA. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 10(2), 8-13.

Misdi, M. (2020). E-portfolio as an authentic learning assessment in a response to COVID-19 outbreak in Indonesian higher education: Toward critical student-writers. Research and Innovation in Language Learning, 3(2), 158–162.

Mohamad, S. N. A., Embi, M. A., & Nordin, N. M. (2016). Designing an E-Portfolio as a Storage, Workspace, and Showcase for Social Sciences and Humanities in Higher Education Institutions. Asian Social Science, 12(5), 185–194.

Nahadi, N., Anwar, S., & Pertiwi, H. R. (2016). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian kinerja pada pembelajaran titrasi asam basa dengan metode praktikum. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA, 21(1), 35-41.

Nahadi, N., Purnawarman, P., & Siswaningsih, W. (2021). Development of an Electronic Portfolio Assessment Model in Learning Chemistry to Develop the Habits of Mind and Reasoning of Indonesian Students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1788.

Nurbani, N., & Permana, R. (2020). Efektivitas E-Portofolio Berbantuan Edmodo Terhadap Keaktifan Belajar dan Kreativitas Mahasiswa Pada Mata Kuliah Desain Grafis. Edumatic: Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika, 4(2), 129-135.

Nurhayati, F. R., & Sumbawati, M. S. (2014). Pengembangan E-Portofolio Sebagai Instrument Penilaian Siswa di SMK 2 Lamongan. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Elektro, 3(1), 253-259.

Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2019). Framework For 21st Century Learning Definitions.

Purwati, S., & Alberida, H. (2022). Profile of Students’ Creative Thinking Skills in High School. Thinking Skills and Creativity Journal, 5(1), 22-27.

Rahmawati, M., & Suryadi, E. (2019). Guru Sebagai Fasilitator dan Efektivitas Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Manajemen Perkantoran (JPManper), 4(1), 49-54.

Ratnawulan, E. (2015). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: Pustaka Setia

Rikmasari, R., & Wati, D. M. (2018). Hubungan persepsi penggunaan media visual gambar (poster) dengan cara berpikir kreatif siswa kelas 3 pada mata pelajaran bahasa indonesia di Bekasi. Holistika: Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD, 1(1).

Sholikhin, M., & Harsono, D. (2021). Enhancing Student Involvement Based on Adoption Mobile Learning Innovation as Interactive Multimedia. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 15(8), 101-118.

Thiagarajan, S. (1974). Instructional Development for Training Teachers of Exceptional Children. Washinton DC: National Center for Improvement Educational System.

Tirri, K., Cho, S., Ahn, D. & Campbell, J. (2017). Education for Creativity and Talent Development in the 21st Century. (Editorial). Hindawi: Education Research International.

Whitten, K. W., Davis, R. E., Peck, M. L., & Stanley, G. G. (2014). Chemistry 10th Edition. Cengage Learning.

Wu, M., Zhao, J. L., Ho, S. Y., & Liang, L. (2015). Effect of Feedback on Creativity in Social Learning Contexts. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2015-March, 1961–1971.

Wulan, A. R., Isnaeni, A., & Solihat, R. (2018). Penggunaan Asesmen Elektronik Berbasis Edmodo Sebagai Assessment for Learning Keterampilan Abad 21. Indonesian Journal of Educational Assessment, 2(1), 1–10.

Yanti, Y., S, S., Tarmizi, & Syukri, M. (2018). The Influence of E-Portfolio Task Through The Facebook Network on The Creativity Of Junior High School Students. New Educational Review, 53(3),177–186.

Yuniarti, E., Bahar, A., & Elvinawati, E. (2020). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Materi Konsep Redoks Menggunakan Certainty of Response Index (Cri) di Sma Negeri 9 Kota Bengkulu. Alotrop, 4(1), 69–82.

Zidan, Z. (2019). Penggunaan Asesmen Portofolio Berbasis Edmodo Untuk Meningkatkan Kreativitas Abad Ke-21 Siswa pada Materi Sistem Pernapasan (Dissertation). Bandung: Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Zubaidah, S. (2018). Mengenal 4C: Learning and innovation skills untuk menghadapi era revolusi industri 4.0. In 2nd Science Education National Conference 13(2), 1–18.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.