Interpersonal Communication Between Athletes and Coaches of Student Activity Units in Unnes

Limpad Nurrachmad, Fatona Suraya, Fajar Awang Irawan

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis proses komunikasi interpersonal antara pelatih dan atlet di Unit Kegiatan Mahasiswa (UKM) Universitas Negeri Semarang. Komunikasi interpersonal antara pelatih dan atlet merupakan salah satu kunci keberhasilan dalam pembinaan olahraga mengingat peran komunikasi sebagai alat penyampaian gagasan, pengetahuan, dan masukan selama proses pembinaan. Proses komunikasi interpersonal dengan enam elemen/komponen komunikasi olahraga menjadi acuan dalam penelitian ini. Penelitian ini dirancang dengan menggunakan deskriptif kualitatif dengan metode studi kasus untuk mendeskripsikan proses komunikasi interpersonal antara pelatih dan atlet atletik, pencak silat, petanque, dan tenis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa proses komunikasi interpersonal antara pelatih dan atlet sangat bergantung pada konteks. Selain itu, dalam komunikasi interpersonal antara pelatih dan atlet, terlihat bahwa para pelatih cukup dominan dalam proses komunikasi tersebut. Kesamaan latar belakang juga dapat menjadi faktor yang mendukung komunikasi interpersonal antara pelatih dan atlet yang menjadi anggota unit kegiatan mahasiswa (UKM) olahraga di UNNES.

This study aims at analyzing the process of interpersonal communication between coaches and athletes at the Student Activity Units (UKM) in Semarang State University. Interpersonal communication between coaches and athletes is one of the keys to success in sports development considering the role of communication as a tool in conveying ideas, knowledge, and inputs during the coaching process. The process of interpersonal communication with six elements/components of sports communication becomes a reference in this study. This research was designed by using qualitative descriptive with case study method to describe the process of interpersonal communication between coaches and athletes of athletics, pencak silat, petanque, and tennis. The results showed that the process of interpersonal communication between coaches and athletes is highly dependent on context. In addition, in interpersonal communication between coaches and athletes, it appears that the coaches were quite dominant in the communication process. Background similarities can also be a factor that supports interpersonal communication between coaches and athletes who become members of sports student activity unit (UKM) in UNNES.

Keywords

Sport Communication; Athletes; Coaches; Student Activity Units

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adie, J. W., & Jowett, S. (2010). Meta-perceptions of the coach–athlete relationship, achievement goals, and intrinsic motivation among sport participants. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(11), 2750-2773. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00679.x

Arnold, P. J. (1999). The virtues, moral education, and the practice of sport. Quest, 51(1), 39-54.

Berger, C. R. (2008). Interpersonal communication. The international encyclopedia of communication.

Cherubini, J. (2019). Strategies and communication skills in sports coaching.

DeVito, J. A. (2019). The interpersonal communication book. Instructor, 1, 18.

Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., ... & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of research in Nursing, 25(8), 652-661.

Isoard-Gautheur, S., Trouilloud, D., Gustafsson, H., & Guillet-Descas, E. (2016). Associations between the perceived quality of the coach-athlete relationship and athlete burnout: An examination of the mediating role of achievement goals. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 22, 210-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.08.003

Jarvie, G. (2013). Sport, culture and society: an introduction. Routledge.

Jowett, S. (2007). Expanding the interpersonal dimension of coaching: closeness in the coach-athlete relationship: a commentary. Int. J. Sport Sci. Coach. 2, 513–517. doi: 10.1260/174795407783359632

Jowett, S. (2017). Coaching effectiveness: The coach–athlete relationship at its heart. Current opinion in psychology, 16, 154-158.

Jowett, S., & Ntoumanis, N. (2004). The Coach - Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (CART – Q): Development and initial validation. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 14, 245-257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2003.00338.x

Jowett, S., & Poczwardowski, A. (2007). Understanding the coach-athlete relationship. Social psychology in sport, 6, 3-14.

Kim, Y., & Park, I. (2020). “Coach Really Knew What I Needed and Understood Me Well as a Person”: Effective Communication Acts in Coach–Athlete Interactions among Korean Olympic Archers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(9), 3101.

Rosca, V. (2010). The coach-athlete communication process. Towards a better human resources management in sport. Management Research and Practice, 2(3), 275-284.

Sagar, S. S., & Jowett, S. (2012). Communicative acts in coach–athlete interactions: When losing competitions and when making mistakes in training. Western Journal of Communication, 76, (2), 148-174. doi:10.1080/10570314.2011.651256

Shipherd, A. M., Wakefield, J. C., Stokowski, S., & Filho, E. (2019). The influence of coach turnover on student-athletes' affective states and team dynamics: An exploratory study in collegiate sports. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 14(1), 97-106.

Sundberg, J., & Sundberg, J. (2013). How to win at sports parenting: Maximizing the sports experience for you and your child. WaterBrook.

Turman P.D. (2017). “Sport as interpersonal communication,” in Defining Sport Communication, ed Billings A. C. (New York, NY: Routledge; ), 165–177.

West, L. (2016). Coach-athlete communication: Coaching style, leadership characteristics, and psychological outcomes.

Wikipedia contributors. (2020, May 3). Sport communication. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 13:35, January 3, 2020, from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sport_communication&oldid=1085925827


View Counter: Abstract - 599 and PDF - 377

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.