Efficiency of Implementation of Alternative Dispute Settlement for Fintech Lending Users

Zalna Tiara(1), Kukuh Tejomurti(2),

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jsi.v8i1.35951


(1) Universitas Sebelas Maret
(2) Universitas Sebelas Maret

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the dispute resolution mechanism at PT Satustop Finansial Solusi and the effective and efficient application of APS for fintech lending users. This article includes a type of normative legal research that is prescriptive and applied with a legal approach, a case approach, and a conceptual approach. Source materials obtained through primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The technique used is the syllogism method through a deductive mindset. The dispute resolution mechanism applied by PT Satustop Finansial Solusi is through litigation (judicial institutions). The results show that dispute resolution through litigation is deemed less effective and efficient, so the authors use the provisions in Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution, POJK Number 1/POJK.07/2014 concerning Alternative Dispute Resolution Institutions in the Financial Services Sector, and the Theory of Economic Analysis of Law proposed by Richard A. Posner. In this theory, states that the application of economic principles as rational choices to analyze legal issues.

Keywords

Fintech Lending, Alternative Dispute Resolution, Economic Analysis of Law

Full Text:

PDF

References

Sugianto, Fajar. Economic Analysis of Law: Seri Analisis Ke-Ekonomian tentang Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group. 2014.

Susanti, Adi Nugroho. Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Jakarta: Telaga Ilmu Indonesia. 2009.

Jurnal

Amalina, Hanifati Nur, Muhammad Gholib Ramdani, Muhammad Rasyid Ashiddiq, Indra Sulistiyani, dan Lokania Lokania. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Dalam Peer To Peer Lending (Pinjam-Meminjam Online)”. Jurnal Lontar Merah. 2, No. 1 (2019).

Benuf, Kornelius, Ery Agus Priyono, Siti Mahmudah, Siti Malikhatun Badriyah, Bagus Rahmanda, dan Amiek Soemarmi. “Efektivitas Pengaturan Dan Pengawasan Bisnis Financial Technology (Peer To Peer Lending) Di Indonesia”. Jurnal Pandecta. 15, No. 2 (2020).

Hariyani, Iswi dan Cita Yustisia Serfiyani. “Perlindungan Hukum Dan Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Jasa PM-Tekfin”. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia. 14, No. 03 (2017).

Karimah, Syafa dan Margo Hadi Putra. “Aspek Hukum Perlindungan Kepada Para Investor Perusahaan Financial Technology Apabila Debitornya Tidak Melakukan Pembayaran Dan Akibat Hukumnya”. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan. 7, No. 8 (2021).

Kusumawati, Erika, Yanuar Putra Erwin, dan Verinda Farmadita Pranoto. “Kewenangan Badan Peradilan Memeriksa Sengketa Dengan Klausula Arbitrase”. Jurnal Privat Law. Edisi 02 (2013).

Muryati, Dewi Tuti dan B. Rini Heryanti. “Pengaturan Dan Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa Non Litigasi Di Bidang Perdagangan”. Jurnal Dinamika Sosbud. 13, No. 1 (2011).

Putra, Komang Satria Wibawa dan I Nyoman Budiana. “Perjanjian Kredit Melalui Financial Technology Dalam Lalu Lintas Hukum Bisnis”. Jurnal Analisis Hukum. 2, No. 1 (2019).

Sugianto, Fajar. “Butir-Butir Pemikiran Dalam Sejarah Intelektuil Dan Perkembangan Akademik Hukum Dan Ekonomi”. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. 10, No. 19 (2014).

Syafrida. “Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Sebagai Solusi Mewujudkan Asas Pemeriksaan Perkara “Sederhana, Waktu Singkat, dan Biaya Murah”. Jurnal Sosial & Budaya Syar-i. 7, No. 4 (2020).

Internet

https://kliklegal.com/bam-hki-sebagai-alternatif-penyelesaian-sengketa-yang-efektif/#:~:text=Badan%20Arbitrase%20dan%20Mediasi%20Hak,HKI)%20Melalui%20Arbitrase%20dan%20Mediasi. (diakses 2 Maret, 2022)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Zalna Tiara, Kukuh Tejomurti

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
The journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License