Email this article PENGEMBANGAN MODEL INDEKS PEMBANGUNAN GIZI
(1) Gedung F1, Lantai 2, Kampus Sekaran, Gunungpati, Semarang, 50229
Abstract
Kemajuan pembangunan gizi dapat diukur dengan Indeks Pembangunan Gizi (IPG). Perlu pengembangan instrumen IPG untuk menilai dan memetakan kemajuan pembangunan gizi yang dicapai oleh kabupaten atau kota. Masalah penelitian adalah bagaimana pengembangan model indeks pembangunan gizi. Tujuan penelitian adalah untuk mengembangkan model indeks pembangunan gizi. Metode penelitian survei dilakukan di kota dan Kabupaten Semarang. Pengkajian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dan kuantitatif. Penelitian kualitatif dilakukan melalui FGD, serta eksplorasi pendapat pakar untuk pengembangan instrumen. Penelitian kuantitatif untuk mengkontruksi instrumen dan pengukuran IPG. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan IPG terdiri dari 4 dimensi utama yaitu status gizi, konsumsi energi dan zat gizi, keamanan pangan, serta gaya hidup. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan rata-rata IPG Kota Semarang sebesar 0,701 (kategori sedang), dengan rata-rata tiap dimensi adalah : status gizi 0,947 (baik), konsumsi energi dan zat gizi 0,458 (kurang), keamanan pangan 0,729 (sedang), gaya hidup 0,672 (sedang). Rata-rata IPG Kabupaten Semarang sebesar 0,652 (sedang), dengan rata-rata tiap dimensi adalah : status gizi 0,979 (baik), konsumsi energi dan zat gizi 0,474 (kurang), keamanan pangan 0,833 (baik), gaya hidup 0,322 (kurang). Simpulan penelitian menunjukkan rendahnya indeks dimensi gaya hidup (khususnya di Kabupaten Semarang) sehingga perlunya Komunikasi Informasi dan Edukasi (KIE) gizi lebih intensif.
Nutritional development progress can be measured by Nutrition Development Index (NDI). It is necessary for NDI development to assess and mapping the nutritional development progress achieved by a county. Research problem was how develop the nutrition development index nutrition development index model. Research purpose was to develop the nutrition development index nutrition development index model in Semarang districts Assessment used qualitative and quantitative approaches. Qualitative research was used by focus group discussions (FGD) and expert opinion exploration to develop the instrument. Quantitative research was used to construct instruments, and NDI measurement. The results showed four main dimensions of IPG were nutritional status, energy and nutrients consumption, food safety, and lifestyle. The results showed an average of IPG of Semarang city was 0.701 (medium category). The average of each dimension: 0.947 nutritional status (good), the consumption of energy and nutrients 0,458 (approximately), food safety 0.729 (medium), 0.672 lifestyle (moderate). The average of IPG Semarang District was 0.652 (medium). The average of each dimension was 0.979 nutritional status (good), the consumption of energy and nutrients 0.474 (approximately), 0,833 food safety (good), lifestyle 0.322 (approximately). Conclusion, index lifestyle dimensional was low (especially in Semarang District), so need Information, Education, and Communication (IEC) about nutrition more intensive.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abas Basuni Jahari. 2005. Keluarga Sadar Gizi (kadarzi) dalam menuju gizi baik untuk semua. Gizi Indon,28 (1): 1 – 8
Bondevik, GT., Eskeland, B., Ulvik, R.J. 2000.Anemia in pregnancy : possible causes and risk factors in Nepali women. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition,54: 3-8
Boniface Kalanda, dan Francine Verhoeff. 2009. Low birth weight and fetal anemia asriskfactor for infant morbidity in rural Malawi. Malawi Medical Journal,21 (2):69 - 74
Christian P et al. 2003. Effects of alternative maternal micronutrient suplements on low birth weight in rural Nepal : double blind randomised community trial. British Medical Journal, 236(15):1–6
Dinkes Kota Semarang. 2007. Profil Kesehatan Kota Semarang Tahun 2006. Dinkes Kota Semarang.
Irwan Budiono. 2008. Prevalensi dan determinan kejadian anemia pada ibu hamil. Studi pada keluarga nelayan di Mangkang Semarang. Laporan Penelitian Dosen Muda DP2M Dikti Universitas Negeri Semarang tahun 2008.
Irwan Budiono. 2010. Pengembangan model indeks pembangunan gizi (studi dalam kerangka pemetaan kemajuan pembangunan gizi). Laporan Penelitian Hibah Strategis Nasional Universitas Negeri Semarang tahun 2010.
JE. Siza. 2008. Risk factors associated with low birth weight of neonates pregnant women attending a referral hospital in northern Tanzania. Tanzania Journal of Health Research, 10(1)
Kepmenkes No. 564/Menkes/ SK/VIII/2006. Pengembangan Desa Siaga dan Pos Kesehatan Desa.
Lindsay H Allen. 2000. Anemia and iron deficiency: effects on pregnancy outcome1–3. Am J Clin Nutr,71(suppl):1280S–4S.
Oktia Woro. 2012. Daerah Positive Deviance sebagai Rekomendasi Model Perbaikan Gizi. Jurnal Kemas, 7(2):95-103
Olalekan A Uthman. 2008. Effect of low birth weight on infant mortality; analysis using weibul hazard modul. Internal Journal of Epidemiology
Peter G Lunn. 2002. Growth retardation and stunting of children in developing countries. British Journal of Nutrition, 88:109-110
Raheela MA Mian, dan Mohammed Ali. (2002) The nutritional status of school – age children in an urban squatter settlement in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition 1 (3) : 121- 123
S.A. Rizvi, J Hatcher, R Qureshi. 2007. Maternal risk factors associated with low birth weight in Karachi : a case control study. Eastern Mediteranian Health Journal,13(6):1343- 1351
Soekirman. 2005. Ilmu Gizi dan Aplikasinya. Jakarta. Penerbit Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Soekirman dkk. 2003. Situational Analysis of Nutrition Problems in Indonesia: Its Policy, Programs and Prospective Development. IPB. Bogor.
United Nation Development Programme (UNDP). .2006. Human Development Report 2006. New York: Oxford University Press.
Usha Ramakrishnan. .2004. Nutrition and low birth weight: from research to practice. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 79(1):17-21
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
