The Akhlak Revolution: A Triadic Interplay Between Piety, Islamization, and Neoliberal Ethics

Naeni Amanulloh(1), Muhammad Nurul Huda(2), Hanifa Maulidia(3),


(1) Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Indonesia (UNUSIA) Jakarta
(2) Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Indonesia (UNUSIA) Jakarta
(3) Politeknik Imigrasi Jakarta

Abstract

This article will examine the efforts of a group of middle-class urban Muslims in cultivating the piety. It will trace the working logic of the formation of pious subject, as a point of departure to comprehend the increasing of religious zeal of the middle-class urban Moslem. By exploration on the activity of the employee and leaders of a number of companies in the Santri Eksekutif program, we argue that the effort to be a pious subject is often related to and interplay with the aspirations of Islamization of public institutions and with neoliberal ethics. Furthermore, we argue that more than a quest for identity, religious expressions that are public are a form of requirement to be ethical and pious subjet. Through this article we aim to (1) describe a form of ethical and pious subject, (2) explore the formation process of the ethical and pious subject, and (3) accentuate the interplay and complex relationship between the process of cultivating piety, aspirations of Islamization of public institutions, and with neoliberal ethics. This article is based on ethnographic fieldwork in Jakarta and Bogor.

Keywords

urban Muslim revival; Islam; ethical subject; akhlak; moral; pious subject; neolibreal ethic

Full Text:

PDF

References

Alatas, Ismail Fajrie. 2016. The Poetics of Pilgrimage: Assembling Contemporary Indonesian Pilgrimage to Hadramawt, Yemen. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 58 (3), pp. 607-635, DOI:10.1017/S0010417516000293.

Alimi, Moh. Yasir. 2014. Local Repertoires of Reasoning and the Islamist Movement in Post-Authoritarian Indonesia. Indonesia and the Malay World, 42 (122), pp. 24-42. DOI: 10.1080/13639811.2014.884315

Alimi, Moh. Yasir. 2018. Mediatisasi Agama: Post-Truth dan Ketahanan Nasional. Yogyakarta: LKiS.

Amanulloh, Naeni. 2012. Kesalehan dan Agency: Perspektif Antropologis dalam Mendekati Subjek Beragama. In Tony

Rudyansjah (Ed.) Antropologi Agama: Wacana-Wacana Mutakhir dalam Kajian Religi. Jakarta: UI Press. Pp. 135-166.

Appadurai, Arjun. 2005. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis, London: University of Minnesota Press.

Ardhianto, Imam. 2016. Kontra Publik Keagamaan dalam Media Baru: Islam, Kebudayaan Populer, dan Media Sosial pada Gerakan #IndonesiaTanpaJIL. Antropologi Indonesia, 37 (2), pp. 83-102. DOI: 10.7454/ai.v37i2.8768.

Asad, Talal. 2007. Explaining the Global Religious Revival: The Egyptian Case. In Gerrie ter Haar and Yoshio Tsuruoka (Eds.) Religion and Society: An Agenda for the 21st Century. Leiden-Boston: Brill. Pp. 83-103.

Astuti, Rahma Dani Pudji. 2017. Perubahan Pondok Pesantren Modern di Perkotaan: Studi Kasus Pondok Pesantren Al-Adzkar Tangerang Selatan, Banten. Masyarakat: Jurnal Sosiologi, 22 (2), pp. 257-279. DOI: 10.7454/mjs.v22i2.6873.

Azra, Azyumardi. 2017. Relijiusitas Masyarakat Urban (1). https://www.republika.co.id/berita/kolom/resonansi/17/07/12/oszdgc319-relijiusitas-masyarakat-urban-1

Bakhtin, M.M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Caryl Emerson dan Michael Holquist (Trans.). Austin: University of Texas.

Bisri, Mustofa. 2017. Gus Mus-Akhlak Sebagai Inti Islam|Sendi-Sendi Islam. Channel YouTube: GusMus Channel. https://youtu.be/CaB8P9Sshs4

Campbell, Richmond. 2019. Moral Epistemology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-epistemology/

Dhofier, Zamakhsyari. 2011. Tradisi Pesantren: Studi Pandangan Hidup Kyai dan Visinya Mengenai Masa Depan Indonesia. Jakarta: LP3ES.

Geertz, Clifford. 1973a. Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture. In The Interpretations of Culture. New York: Basic Books, Inc. Pp. 3-30.

Geertz, Clifford. 1973b. Religion As a Cultural System. Dalam The Interpretations of Culture. New York: Basic Books, Inc. Pp. 87-125.

Hadi, Syamsul. 2017. Arah Baru Lembaga Pesantren dalam Kehidupan Masyarakat Desa: Idealisme Versus Pragmatisme. Sekolah Pascasarjana Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Hadi, Syamsul. 2019. The Economy of Wellbeing in Beji East Java: Pesantren And Entrepreneurship in Village Communities. Jurnal Ilmiah Agama dan Sosial Budaya, 4 (1), pp. 94-102. DOI: 10.15575/jw.v4i1.3302.

Hamdi, Mujtaba. 2006. Dakwah Transformatif. Jakarta: Lakpesdam NU.

Heryanto, Ariel. 2011. Upgraded Piety and Pleasure: The New Middle Class and Islam in Indonesian Popular Culture. In Andrew N. Weintraub (Ed.). Islam and Popular Culture in Indonesia and Malaysia. London and New York: Routledge. Pp. 60-82.

Heryanto, Ariel. 2015. Identitas dan Kenikmatan: Politik Budaya Layar Indonesia. Jakarta: Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia (KPG).

Horikoshi, Hiroko. 1987. Kyai dan Perubahan Sosial. Jakarta: Perhimpunan Pengembangan Pesantren dan Masyarakat (P3M).

Hwang, Julie Chernov. 2009. Umat Bergerak: Mobilisasi Damai Kaum Islamis di Indonesia, Malaysia, dan Turki. Jakarta: Freedom Institute.

Jati, Wasisto Raharjo. 2015. Islam Populer Sebagai Pencarian Identitas Muslim Kelas Menengah Indonesia. Teosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf dan Pemikiran Islam, 5 (1), pp. 139-163. DOI: 10.15642/teosofi.2019.9.2.

Kafid, Nur. 2014. From Personal to Social Transformation: A Phenomenological Study on the Life of ‘Kyai Kampung’. Komunitas: International Journal of Indonesian Society and Culture, 6 (2), pp. 189-196. DOI: 10.15294/komunitas.v6i1.3313.

Kumar, P. Pratap. 2007. Global Religions and Local Cultures: Introduction. Dalam Gerrie ter Haar and Yoshio Tsuruoka (Eds.) Religion and Society: An Agenda for the 21st Century. Leiden: Brill. Pp. 79-81.

Lefebvre, Henri. 2003. The Urban Revolution. Minneapolis-London: University of Minnesota Press.

Mahmood, Saba. 2005. Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subjetc. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Maulidia, Hanifa. 2011. Pendidikan Sebagai Proses Pelembagaan Kepatuhan Sosial-Keagamaan: Studi Komunitas Betawi Muslim di Kampung Pulo Kelurahan Kalibata Jakarta Selatan. Skripsi. Program Studi Pendidikan Sosiologi, Jurusan Sosiologi, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial, Universitas Negeri Jakarta.

Mittermaier, Amira. 2013. Trading With God: Islam, Calculation, Excess. In Janice Boddy and Michael Lambek (Eds.). A Companion to the Anthropology of Religion. West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell. Pp. 274-293.

Pramono, Didi. 2018. The Authority of Kyai Toward The Santri: A Review of Gender Construction at Pondok Pesantren. Komunitas: International Journal of Indonesian Society and Culture, 10 (1), pp. 92-100. DOI: 10.15294/komunitas.v9i1.8142.

Pribadi, Yanwar, Zaki Ghufron. 2018. Komodifikasi Islam dalam Ekonomi Pasar: Studi Tentang Musllim Perkotaan Banten. Jurnal Afkaruna, 15 (1), pp. 82-112. DOI: 10.18196/AIIJIS.2019.0096.82-112.

Rudnyckyj, Daromir. 2009. Spiritual Economies: Islam and Neoliberalism in Contemporary Indonesia. Cultural Anthropology, 24 (1), pp. 104-141. DOI: 10.1111/j.1548-1360.2009.00028.x.

Rudnyckyj, Daromir. 2010. Spiritual Economies: Islam, Globalization, and the Afterlife of Development. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press. https://muse.jhu.edu/book/55613

Rudyansjah. 2009. Kekuasaan, Sejarah, dan Tindakan: Sebuah Kajian Tentang Lanskap Budaya. Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.

Shihab, M. Quraish. 2019. Islam yang Saya Anut: Dasar-Dasar Ajaran Islam. Tangerang: Lentera Hati.

Shihab, M. Qurasih. 2017. Yang Hilang Dari Kita: Akhlak. Tangerang: Lentera Hati.

Turner, Victor W. 1991. The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. Ithaca New York: Cornell University Press.

van Bruinessen, Martin. 2012. Kitab Kuning, Pesantren dan Tarekat. Yogyakarta: Gading Publishing.

Vidich, Arthur J., Stanford M. Lyman. 1998. Qualitative Methods: Their History in Sociology and Anthropology. In Norman K. Denzin & Yvonna S. Lincoln (Eds.) The Landscape of Qualitative Research. Theories and Issues. Thousands Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage Publications. Pp. 41-110.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.