Main Factors of Nullity of Marriage in the Chatolic Church of Bogor Diocese

Yohanes Driyanto(1), Yasintha Soelasih(2),

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/komunitas.v13i1.29038


(1) Chatolic University of Parahyangan
(2) Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia

Abstract

The essence of marriage is two persons (man and woman) becoming one flesh. It comes from the will of God, so it is holy and sacred. Every couple has to maintain its unity and indissolubility until death separates them. In Catholic teaching, there is no divorce. Nevertheless, there is nullity or annulment for certain marriages. There are three kinds of marriage that can be declared null. The first, marriage that is entered into by man or woman having diriment impediment (can. 1083 -1094). The second, marriage that its matrimonial consent is not free, true, or full (can. 1095 - 1107). The third, marriage that is lack of form (can. 1108 - 1123). The Tribunal or Ecclesiastical Court carries out the process of nullity. This research, therefore, takes its emphasis on the main factors causing the nullity of marriage in the Catholic Church. The research was conducted in the Diocese of Bogor. The sampling method was purposive sampling. The number of informants was 18. In-depth interviews carried out data collection. Validity and reliability tests were conducted on informants. The analysis data was descriptive. The analysis results show that the main factor rendering null the marriage is the infidelity of the couple, communication that doesn’t work well between couples, and domestic violence.

Keywords

marriage; nullity; Canon Law; Catholic Church

Full Text:

PDF

References

Afiyanti, Y. (2008). Validitas dan Reliabilitas dalam Penelitian Kualitatif. Jurnal Keperawatan Indonesia, 12(2), 137–141.

Bachri, B. S. (2010). Meyakinkan Validitas Data Melalui Triangulasi Pada Penelitian Kualitatif. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 10(1), 46–62.

BPS. (2021). Jumlah Nikah, Talak dan Cerai, serta Rujuk (Pasangan Nikah). https://www.bps.go.id/indicator/27/176/1/jumlah-nikah-talak-dan-cerai-serta-rujuk.html

Dariyo, A. (2003). Psikologi Perkembangan Dewasa Muda. Grasindo.

Dewi, N. R., & Hendriani, W. (2014). Faktor protektif untuk mencapai resiliensi pada remaja setelah perceraian orangtua. Jurnal Psikologi Klinis Dan Kesehatan Mental, 03(03), 37–43. http://journal.unair.ac.id/downloadfull/JPKS8891-77aabf9ceefullabstract.pdf

Diocese, B. (2020). Nullity. Keuskupan Bogor.

Driyanto, Y. (2018). Tujuan, Identitas dan Misi Perkawinan Katolik. Penerbit Obor.

Duba, J., & Ponton, R. (2012). Catholic Annulment, an Opportunity for Healing and Growing: Providing Support in Counseling. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 31(3), 242–252.

Galed, D. O. (2020). Perkawinan In Fieri dan Perkawinan In Facto Esse dalam Pemahaman Yuridis Gereja Katolik. Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus, 3(1), 57–68.

Halawa, A. A. (2017). Nilai Unitas (Monogam) Perkawinan Katolik Dalam Terang Biblis. Logos, Jurnal Filsafat-Teologi, 14(2), 53–67.

Jawa, T. T. K. R. (2006). Kitab Hukum Kanonik (1st ed.). Konferensi Wali Gereja Indonesia.

Kancak, M. K. L. (2014). Perkawinan yang Tak Terceraikan menurut Hukum Kanonik. Lex et Societatis, 2(3), 83–94.

Lon, Yohanes S. (2020). Program KPPK : Upaya Meningkatkan Kesadaran Pasutri Mengenai Hakikat Perkawinan Katolik di Keuskupan Ruteng. Randang Tana: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 3(1), 1–13.

Lon, Yohanes Servatius. (2020). Tantangan Perceraian Sipil bagi Perkawinan Katolik : Antara Hukum Ilahi dan Hukum Manusia. Jurnal Selat, 7(2), 151–168.

Lumme. (2007). Norma Hukum Agama Katolik di Bidang Perceraian dan Konflik Penerapannya di Pengadilan bagi Perceraian Suami Istri. Jurnal Hukum Pro Justicia, 25(2), 90–101.

Matondang, A. (2014). Faktor-faktor yang Mengakibatkan Perceraian dalam Perkawinan. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Dan Sosial Politik UMA, 2(2), 141–150. http://ojs.uma.ac.id/index.php/jppuma

Ningrum, P. R. (2013). Perceraian Orang Tua dan Penyesuaian Diri Remaja Studi pada Remaja Sekolah Menengah Atas/Kejuruan di Kota Samarinda. Psikoborneo, 1(1), 39–44.

Noble, H., & Smith, J. (2015). Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research. Evidence-Based Nursing, 18(2), 34–35. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2015-102054

Paul II, J. (1981). Ad.Ap. Familiaris Consortio.

Prianto, B., Wulandari, N. W., & Rahmawati, A. (2013). Rendahnya Komitmen Dalam Perkawinan Sebagai Sebab Perceraian. Jurnal Komunitas, 5(2), 208–218. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/komunitas

Rais, I. (2014). Tingginya Angka Cerai Gugat (Khulu’) di Indonesia: Analisis Kritis terhadap Penyebab dan Alternatif Solusi Mengatasinya. Al-’Adalah, 12(1), 191–204.

Rose, J., & Johnson, C. W. (2020). Contextualizing reliability and validity in qualitative research: toward more rigorous and trustworthy qualitative social science in leisure research. Journal of Leisure Research, 51(4), 432–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2020.1722042

Sari, M. N., Yusri, Y., & Sukmawati, I. (2015). Faktor Penyebab Perceraian dan Implikasinya dalam Pelayanan Bimbingan dan Konseling. Jurnal Konseling Dan Pendidikan, 3(1), 16–21. https://doi.org/10.29210/112200

Zaluchu, S. E. (2020). Strategi Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif di dalam Penelitian Agama. Evangelikal: Jurnal Teologi Injili Dan Pembinaan Warga Jemaat, 4(1), 28–38.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.