PSHT Logo as Manifestation of Pancasila Ideological Values

Suryo - Ediyono(1),

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/komunitas.v8i2.7322


(1) Universitas Sebelas Maret, Faculty of Cultural Science

Abstract

This study aims to analyze and describe meanings on the symbols embodied in the martial arts logo school of Setia Hati Terate Brotherhood (PSHT) and its representation towards the ideological values of Pancasila. The study is based on the Ethnosemiotical approach. This analytical method on the cultural texts connects the understanding of reading the symbolic expressions represented in the PSHT logo. The results conclude that the symbolic entities on PSHT logo imply a concordance on the values between the Peircean semiotic perspectives in the form of the organizational principles confirming the ideological state of Pancasila. The result showed that on the symbol of lotus flower buds, half-bloom and bloom refers to the philosophical meaning of ‘having stability and confidence in social skills, therefore, they don’t feel awkward and feeling inferior’ it would seem difficult to find the meaning of connotation and denotation and thus requires further clarification from the public who involve in the Organizations of PSHT. Identification of such symbols indicating the active-enterprising which motivate the instillation on the values of Pancasila, uniting , maintain and strengthening the unity of the nation, the moving spirit of the nation in undertaking the national development and solving the arising problems in the life of the nation.

Keywords

Pencak Silat; Pancasila; values; Semiotics; logo; philosophical meanings

Full Text:

Fulltext PDF

References

Aj, Ochid. (2010). “Bunga Rampai Pencak Silat – Memahami Pencak Silat Secara Jernih”. [Blogspot Compilation]. Retrieved from http://rasyid-aj.com

Alexander, H.. Chambers, Q., Draeger, D.F. (1972).Pentjak-Silat, the Indonesian Fighting Art. Tokyo & California: Kodansha International, Ltd.

Baehaqie, I. (2014). “Jenang Mancwarna Sebagai Simbol Multikulturalisme Masyarakat Jawa. Jurnal Komunitas. 6 (1) (2014): 180-188. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.15294/komunitas.v6i1.2952

Ediyono, Suryo. (2012). Pencak Silat – Filosofi dan Makna Budi Pekerti. Tesis: Pascasarjana Universitas Gadjah Mada

_____________. (2015). Laku Ritual dalam Tradisi Pencak Silat. Indigenous Knowledge and Cultural Heritage for the Sustainable Development. International Conference Nusantara Philosophy (ICNP) 2015. ISSN: 2354-8517

Facal, Gabriel. (2014). Silat Martial Ritual Initiation in Brunei Darussalam. Southeast Asia: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14. Retrieved from fass.ubd.edu.bn

Imron, Rasyid. (2003). “Social Conflict: Notes from (East Java), Jurnal Conflict Negoitation Study, and Worldbank Office Jakarta. Diakses pada: www-wds.worldbank.org

Littlejohn, Stephen W, 2009 . Teori Komunikasi Theories of Human Communication edisi 9. Jakarta. Salemba Humanika.

Muzakky, I, Novitasarim, U.D, & Hamidah, S. (2015). ‘Comparative Study Dynamics of Psychology of Pencak Silat Groups (Iks. Pi Kerasakti, Persaudaraan Setia Hati Terate, and Pagarnusa), Global Journal of Business and Social Science Review, (1), 1,ISSN 2289-8506. Retrieved from www.gjbssr.org

Maryono, O’ong. (1999). Pencak Silat in the Indonesian Archipelago, RAPID Journal, (4) 2. Retrieved from www.rapidjournal.com

Moleong, Lexy J. (2004). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Murphy, John and Michael Rowe. (1998). How to Design Trademarks and Logos. Ohio: North Light Book

Nazir, Moch. (2003). Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: PT Ghalia Indonesia

Nöth, Winfried. (1995). Handbook of Semiotics. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. Hlm.39-47 dan 310-313.

Opcit Kumpulan Materi Ke-Sh-An Persaudaraan Setia Hati Terate. HAL 8 https://www.academia.edu

Phillips, D.A. (2005). Mondern World Nations –Indonesia. Philadelphia: Chelsea House Publishers

Saifulaziz, Ahda. (2011). Nilai-nilai Luhur dalam Pencak Silat. [Blogspot]. Retrieved from: http://ahdasaifulaziz.blogspot.co.id

Sobur, Alex. (2004). Semiotika Komunikasi. Cetakan Kedua. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Suwaryo (2008). Peranan Organisasi Perguruan Seni Beladiri Pencak Siat dalam Meminimalisasi Kejahatan. Tesis. Program Magister Ilmu Hukum, Pascasarjana Universitas Diponegoro.

Sutopo, HB. (2006). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret Press.

Spradley, James P. (1997). Metode Etnografi [Trans. Misbah Zulfa Alizabeth]. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 3 tahun 2005 tentang Sistem Keolahragaan Nasional, Op.cit., hal.9.

Wilson, I.D. (2002). The Politics of Inner Power: The Practice of Pencak Silat in West Java. [Ph. D Disertation]. School of Asian Studies, Murdoch University, Western Ausralia

Wikipedia®. (2016). “Ethnosemiotics”. Retrieved from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnosemiotics

Yanuartuti, S. (2015). “the Life of Mask Puppet in Jombang: Its Functions and Contnuity”. Jurnal Komunitas. 6 (2): 222-236.doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.15294/komunitas.v6iz.3302

List of key-informants:

Eddy M. Nalapraya (66 years old, Chief of IPSI martial arts school), Jakarta.

H.Tarmadji, SE. (52 years old, General Chief of PSHT), Madiun.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.