Tindak Penyiksaan dan Hukum Internasional

Pranoto Iskandar(1),


(1) Amalia Rubini 35-Cianjur. Jawa Barat

Abstract

Tindak penyiksaan pada saat ini telah mendapatkan popularitasnya kembali seiring dengan insiden Abu Ghraib. Tapi, sebenarnya tindak penyiksaan, sebagaimana dibuktikan oleh rekaman sejarah, merupakan salah satu bentuk kebiadaban yang paling melekat dalam perjalanan umat manusia. Tindak penyiksaan tepatnya bukanlah kejahatan sebagaimana kejahatan umumnya mengingat natur kejahatan ini sendiri yang dapat dilakukan oleh siapa saja – termasuk oleh negara. Oleh karena itu timbul pertanyaan, bagaimana reaksi komunitas internasional terhadap kejahatan ini. Tulisan ini merupakan kajian terhadap tindak penyiksaan dalam hukum internasional.

Torture today has got its popularity due to Abu Graib case. However, torture actually in its history is one of the serious crimes in human being life. Torture is not common crime because naturally it can be done not only by everybody but also by state. Based on this assumption then how is the international community reaction to this kind of crime? This paper is intended to describe this crime in international law perspective. The method of study is library due to the kind of research is normative. There are three kinds of research approaches. They are statute approach, concept approach and case approach.

Keywords

Torture; Crime; International Law; International Community; State Responsibility.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ankumah, E.A. 1996. The African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights: Practices and Procedures. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff

Baehr, P. et.al. (eds.). 2001. Instrumen Internasional Pokok Hak-Hak Asasi Manusia. (pent.) Burhan Tsany dan S. Maimoen. Jakarta: YOI

Brownlie, I. (ed.).1971. Basic Documents on Human Rights.Oxford: Clarendon Press

Brownlie, I. 1990. Principles of Public International Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press

Byrnes, A. 1992. ‘The Committee against Torture’. dalam Philip Alston (ed.). The United Nations and Human Rights: A Critical Appraisal.Oxford: Clarendon Press

Cassese, A. 2003. International Criminal Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Davidson, S. 1998. ‘The Civil and Political Rights Protected in the Inter-American Human Rights System’. dalam David J. Harris dan Stephen Livingstone (eds.). The Inter-American System of Human Rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press

Evans, M.D. dan Rod Morgan, 1998, Preventing Torture: A Study of the European Convention for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman Degrading Treatment or Punishment, New York: Oxford University Press

Gomien, D. 2000. Short Guide to the European Convention on Human Rights.Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing

Greenwood, C. 1995 ‘Historical Development and Legal Basis’. dalam Dieter Fleck (ed.). The Handbook of Humanitarian Law in Armed Conflict. New York: Oxford University Press

Harris, D.J. 1982. Cases and Materials on International Law.London: Sweet and Maxwell.

Henkin, L. 1995. International Law: Politics. Valuesand Functions. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff

Hodgson, M.G.S. 2002. The Venture of Islam: Iman dan Sejarah dalam Peradaban Dunia.vol. 1. buku 2. (pent.) Mulyadhi Kartanegara. Jakarta: Paramadina

Khadduri, M. 1955. War and Peace in the Law of Islam. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press

McGoldrick, D. 1994. The Human Rights Committee: Its Role in the Development of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.Oxford: Clarendon Press

Nowak, M. 2000, ‘Civil and Political Rights’, dalam Janusz Symonides (ed.), Human Rights: Concept and Standards. Dartmouth: UNESCO dan Ashgate

Riyanto, S. 2008. Guiding Principles on Displacement: Institutionalisasi Nilai-Nilai Kemanusiaan Dalam Instrumen Internasional. Jurnal Mimbar Hukum. 20 (1)

Robertson. A.H. dan J. G. Merrills. 1996. Human Rights in the World: An Introduction to the Study of the International Protection of Human Rights. Manchester: Manchester University Press

Ruthven, M. 1978. Torture: The Grand Conspiracy. London: Weidenfield and Nicholson.

Schabas, W.A. 1997. The Abolition of the Death Penalty in International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Steiner, H.J. dan Philip Alston. 1996. International Human Rights in Context: Law. Politics. Morals.New York: Oxford University Press.

Third Restatement. 1987. Retatement (Third) the Foreign Relations Law of The United States. St. Pauls. Minnesota: American Law Institute

Konvensi PBB Menentang Penyiksaan Dan Perlakuan Atau Penghukuman Lain Yang Kejam, Tidak Manusiawi Dan Merendahkan Martabat Manusia. 1984

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.