Analysis of Trademark Cancellation for The Protection of The First Registrant's Trademark: BIOAQUA Study
(1) University of Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
(2) University of Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
Abstract
Due to the cancellation of the BIOAQUA case in Decision Number: 618 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2020, the plaintiff did not receive the legal protection that he deserved. The study’s goal is to examine the legal protection afforded to the first trademark registration applicant in the BIOAQUA trademark case, followed by an examination of the judge’s decision to cancel the BIOAQUA trademark. This study is normative and legal in nature. The research strategy is a case study approach. The data source is secondary data, and the data analysis is qualitative. The findings revealed that in the case of the BIOAQUA trademark, legal protection is provided to the first applicant of trademark registration against the defendant. Because the judge considers the same as the authority under Article 3 of Law No. 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications, the plaintiff is not considered the first registrant. The judge’s consideration in the BIOAQUA trademark cancellation case is based on Articles 76 and 77 of Trademarks and Geographical Indications Law No. 20 of 2016. The judge considers the content of Article 76, namely that cancellation can be made against registered trademarks, but because the element of good faith cannot be proven, the defendant’s trademark is not cancelled, and the legal effect of this is that the defendant’s BIOAQUA trademark is protected by registered trademarks.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Asmara, Andre, Sri Wanly Rahayu dan Sanusi Bintang, “Studi Kasus Penerapan Prinsip Pendaftaran First To File pada Pembatalan Merek Cap Mawar (Putusan MARI Nomor:512K/PDT.SUS-HKI/2016)”, Syiah Kuala Law Jurnal 3, no. 2 (2019):197, https://doi.org/10.24815/sklj.v3i2.11899.
Chudasama, Dhaval, “Importance of Intellectual Property Rights”, Journal of Intelletual Property Law 2, issue 2 (2021): 16, http://lawjournals.celnet.in/index.php/jiprl/index, DOI (Journal): 10.37591/JIPRL
Cantika, Delila Pritalia, “Pembatalan Hak Merek yang telah dijaminkan Jaminan Fiducia”, Jurnal Jurist 5 no. 1 (2018):8, http://dx.doi.org/10.35586/.v5i1.314
Desmayanti, Rakhmita, “Tinjauan Umum Perlindungan Merek Terkenal Sebagai Daya Pembeda Menurut Prespektif Hukum Di Indonesia, Jurnal Cahaya Keadilan 6, no. 1, (2018):8.
Dwi Putra, Fajar Nurcahya, “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemegang Hak Atas Merek Terhadap Perbuatan Pelanggaran Merek”, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Edisi: Januari - Juni 2014): 97-108.
Feriyanto, Mujiyono, Memahami dan Cara Memperoleh Hak Kekayaan Intelektual, (Yogyakarta:Sentra KI Universitas Negeri), 2017
Ishaq, Metode Penelitian Hukum dan Penulisan Skripsi, Tesis, serta Disertasi, (Bandung:CV. Alfabeta, 2017): 66.
Istiqmalia, Medisita Nurfauziah & Iwan Erar Joesoef, Itikad Baik Dalam Pendaftaran Merek Studi Perlindungan Hukum Pemilik Merek Terkenal di Indonesia, Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia (JPHI) 2, Issue 3 (2021): 409, https://doi.org/10.51749/jphi.v2i3.10
Ismail Rumadan, “Bad Faith’s Criteria in Famous Trademark Dispute Settlement that has an Element of Equality in Prinsple in the Court”, Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, vol. 140, (Atlantis Press, International Conference on Law, Economics and Health (ICLEH 2020): 607
Jened, Rahmi Hukum Merek Trade Mark Law Dalam Era Integrasi Ekonomi,(Jakarta:Prenda Mediagrup 2015): 291.
Muliasari, Ruri Suci, Budi Santoso dan Irawati, “Pelanggaran Prinsip Itikad Baik dalam Sengketa Merek Internasional”, NOTARIUS 14 no. 2(2021): 973, https:doi.org/10.14710/nts.v14i2.43788
ND, Mukti Fajar Yati Nurhayati dan Ifrani, “Iktikad Tidak Baik dalam Pendaftaran dan Model Penegakan Hukum Merek di Indonesia, JH Ius Quia Iustum 23, issue 2 (2018): 220, DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol25.iss2.art1
O, Yanto dan Susanto, S. Sosialisasi Kekayaan Intelektual Guna Menumbuh kembangkan Usaha Dalam Rangka Menghadapi Persaingan Global Pada Revolusi 4.0. Abdi Laksana: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat 1, no. 2, (2020): 241
Oxford University Press, “Oxford Reference”, https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803100405351;jsessionid=BBE92D2C3A61252E784EA37F2069A473 (diakses 12 Januari 2023)
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, (Jakarta:Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2013): 134.
Prameswari, Ni Made Ratih, I Nyoman Putu Bidiartha dan Desak Gde Dwi Arini, “Pelanggaran Hukum Hak atas Merek dalam Hubungannya dengan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat di Indonesia”, Jurnal Analogi Hukum 3 no.1 (2021):280., https://ejournal.warmadewa.ac.id/index.php/analogihukum
Rosanti, Dewi, Salamiah dan Dedi Sugiyanto, “Analisis yuridis Itikad Tidak Baik Dalam Pembatalan Merek Dagang Terdaftar Di Direktorat Jendral Kekayaan Intelektual Republik Indonesia (Studi Putusan Nomor 999 K/Pdt.Sus-Hki/2019) “, http://eprints.uniska-bjm.ac.id. (acceessed Januari 14, 2023)
Sekretariat ASEAN, Pedoman Umum untuk Pemeriksaan Substantif Merek Dagang, Edisi Kedua, (Jakarta:Sekretariat ASEAN, April 2020), 18
Syafira, Viona Talitha, “ Perlindungan Hukum bagi Pemegang Merek Superman terhadap Pelanggaran Merek”, Jurnal Suara Hukum 3. no. 1 (Maret 2021):106
Sudjana, Akibat Hukum Penghapusan dan Pembatalan Merek Terdaftar Terhadap Hak Atas Merek (Eletion and Cancellation of Registered Marks in The Perspective of Legal Certainty), Jurnal Law Res Nullius 2 no. 2, (2020): 135
Upreti, Pratyush Nath “The Role of National and International Intellectual Property Law and Policy in Reconceptualising the Definition of Investement”, IIC, no. 52 (2021): 103, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-020-01009-7
Wijayantia, Ana Wahyu, Indirani Wauran, Merek Tiga Dimensi Dalam Hukum Merek Indonesia, Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum 6 (2021): 22, https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v6i1.354
Wauran, Indirani Bastian Christy & Titon Slamet Kurnia, “Confusion dan Pembatalan Merek oleh Pengadilan”, Mimbar Hukum 27 no. 2 (2015): 276, http:jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jmh
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
