The Unconstitutionality of Termination of Employment on The Grounds of An Urgent Offence

Mohamad Fandrian Adhistianto(1),


(1) Faculty of Law, Universitas Pamulang, Indonesia

Abstract

Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 2 of 2022 on Job Creation through Government Regulation No. 35 of 2021 on Fixed-term Labor Contracts, Outsourcing, Breaks during working time and Dismissal provides for dismissal for urgent infractions that are similar in content to dismissal for serious infractions. misconduct under the Manpower Act No. 13 2003, which was repealed based on a decision of the Constitutional Court No. 012/PUU-I/2003. The legal issues that will be addressed in this study are how the constitution envisages dismissal for urgent violations, which are similar in substance to serious misconduct as grounds for dismissal. This type of research is legal research using statutory approach and is carried out by searching for positive legal norms consisting of applicable laws and court decision related to termination of employment on the grounds of urgent violations apply based on Law Number 6 of 2023, although it has similar substance with gross misconduct as a reason for termination of employment in the provisions of Article 158 of Law Number 13 of 2003 which has been declared contrary to the 1945 Constitution so that it does not apply and has binding legal force based on the Constitutional Court Decision Number 012/PUU-I/2003.

Keywords

work termination; urgent reasons; constitutionality

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adhistianto, Mohammad Fandrian. “Politik Hukum Pembentukan Rancangan Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja (Studi Klaster Ketenagakerjaan).” Pamulang Law Review 3, no. 1 (August 15, 2020): 1.

Agusmidah. Dilematika Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Tinjauan Politik Hukum. Medan: PT Softmedia, 2011.

Ali, Mahrus. “Pengawasan Peredaran Barang Cetakan, Due Process Of Law Dan Hak Atas Kebebasan Mengeluarkan Pendapat.” Jurnal Konstitusi 8, no. 4 (May 20, 2016): 521.

Benuf, Kornelius, and Muhamad Azhar. “Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Sebagai Instrumen Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer.” Gema Keadilan 7, no. 1 (April 1, 2020): 20–33.

Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 regarding the examination of Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation, 3 November 2021

Constitutional Court Decision Number 012/PUU-I/2003 regarding examination of Law Number 13 of 2003 on Manpower

Constitutional Court Decision Number 85/PUU-XI/2013 regarding the Examination of Law Number 7 of 2004 concerning Water Resources, 18 February 2015

Constitutional Court Decision Number 103/PUU-XVIII/2020 regarding the Examination of the Law Number 11 of 2020 Concerning Job Creation, 3 November 2021

Constitutional Court Decision Number 98/PUU-XVI/2018 regarding the Examination of Law Number 8 of 2011 concerning Amendments to Law Number 24 of 2003 concerning the Constitutional Court, 30 January 2019

De Sousa, Freidelino Paixao Ramos Alves. “Non-Compliance with Constitutional Court Decisions as an Act of Contempt of Court.” Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev) 4, no. 2 (November 20, 2022): 52–66.

Government Regulation Number 35 of 2021 Converning Fix-Term Work Agreement, Outsourcing, Working Time Break, Termination of Employment

Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 2 of 2022 on Job Creation

Hadi, Fikri. “Negara Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia Di Indonesia.” Wijaya Putra Law Review 1, no. 2 (October 21, 2022): 170–188.

Hadistianto, Mohammad Fandrian. “Eksaminasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Nomor : 37/PUU-IX/2011.” MORALITY : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 7, no. 2 (December 31, 2021): 166.

Indi Nuroini. “Konsekuensi Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 35 Tahun 2021.” Jurnal hukum, politik dan ilmu sosial 1, no. 3 (September 28, 2022): 178–183.

Indrati, Maria Farida. Ilmu Perundang-Undangan, Dasar-Dasar Dan Pembentukannya: (Bagian Pertama Dari Ilmu Pengetahuan Perundang-Undangan). Jakarta: Sekretariat Konsorsium Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Indonesia, 1996.

Indrayani, Denny, and Zainal Arifin Mochtar. “Komparasi Sifat Mengikat Putusan Judicial Review Mahkamah Konstitusi Dan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara.” Mimbar Hukum 19, no. 3 (2007): 437–454.

Industrial Relations Court Decision at the Samarinda District Court Number 53/Pdt.SusPHI/2022/PN. Smr., regarding Termination of Employment on the Ground of Urgent Violation, the case of PT Harmoni Panca Utama (PT.HPU) against Muhammad, et al (7 people), 27 December 2022

Isra, Saldi. “Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Penguatan Hak Asasi Manusia Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Konstitusi 11, no. 3 (May 20, 2016): 409.

Khair, Otti Ilham. “Analisis Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja Terhadap Perlindungan Tenaga Kerja Di Indonesia.” Widya Pranata Hukum: Jurnal Kajian dan Penelitian Hukum 3, no. 2 (2021): 45–63.

Khakim, Abdul. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2014.

Latif, Abdul. “Jaminan UUD 1945 Dalam Proses Hukum Yang Adil.” Jurnal Konstitusi 7, no. 1 (May 20, 2016): 049.

Law Number 12 of 1964 Concerning Termination of Employment in Private Companies

Law Number 25 of 1997 on Manpower

Law Number 39 of 1999 on Humna Rights

Law Number 13 of 2003 on Manpower

Law Number 11 of 2005 on the Ratification of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights

Law Number 11 of 2020 on Job Creation

Law Number 6 of 2023 Concerning The Stipulation of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 2 of 2022 Concerning Job Creation into Law

Letter of the Minister of Manpower and Transmigration Number SE-13/MEN/SJHK/I/2005 Concerning Constitutional Court Decision Number 012/PUU-I/2003 regarding examination of Law Number 13 of 2003 on Manpower

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2019.

Maulidi, Mohammad Agus. “Problematika Hukum Implementasi Putusan Final Dan Mengikat Mahkamah Konstitusi Perspektif Negara Hukum.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 24, no. 4 (October 2017): 535–557.

Muhammad, Mukmin. “Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Hukum Positif Dengan Konsep Constitutional Importance.” Meraja journal 1, no. 3 (2018): 31–38.

Nugroho, Fadzlun Budi Sulistyo. “Sifat Keberlakuan Asas Erga Omnes Dan Implementasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Gorontalo Law Review 2, no. 2 (October 30, 2019): 95.

Nurhayati, Yati, Ifrani Ifrani, and M. Yasir Said. “Metodologi Normatif Dan Empiris Dalam Perspektif Ilmu Hukum.” Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia 2, no. 1 (January 17, 2021): 1–20.

Sari, Elma Saida Rahma. “Implikasi Yuridis Pembangkangan Konstitusi (Constitutional Disobadiance) Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi” (2021). https://fh.unram.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/ELMA-SAIDA-R-D1A017089.pdf.

Sayudi, Akbar, Rico Andrian Nahampun, and Gusti Mauritza. “Penyelesaian Perselisihan Ketenagakerjaan Karena Kesalahan Berat Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konsitusi Nomor 012/PUU/-I/2003.” JURNAL HUKUM PELITA 2, no. 2 (November 24, 2021): 59–69.

Setiadi, Wicipto. Ilmu & Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Jakarta: Damera Press, 2022.

Siallagan, Haposan. “Penerapan Prinsip Negara Hukum Di Indonesia.” Sosiohumaniora 18, no. 2 (October 26, 2016). Accessed January 7, 2023. http://jurnal.unpad.ac.id/sosiohumaniora/article/view/9947.

Simmond, RL, ID Petersen, and AG Braddock. “Discussion Paper On Contempt By Disobedience To The Orders Of The Court.” Australia: Law Reform Commission of Western Australia, 2002. https://www.wa.gov.au/system/files/2021-04/LRC-Project-093-3-Discussion-Paper.pdf.

Soeroso, Fajar Laksono. “‘Pembangkangan’ Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Yudisial 6, no. 3 (2013): 227–249.

Subekti, R. Aneka Perjanjian. 10th ed. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti, 1995.

Sufajar, Didik. “Hukum Perburuhan Dimata Kaum Buruh.” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum & Masyarakat 3, no. 1 (2020).

Supomo, Iman. Hukum Perburuhan Bidang Pelaksanaan Hubungan Kerja. Jakarta: Djambatan, 1983.

Supreme Court Decision Number 1256 K/Pdt.SusPHI/2022, regarding Cassation, the case of Yasona Lase against PT Wilmar Nabati Indonesia, 11 August 2022

Triastuti, Septina Lia. “Perlindungan Hak Konstitusional Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi: Pembatalan Larangan Pernikahan Pegawai Satu Atap.” Masalah-Masalah Hukum 47, no. 4 (2018). https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/mmh/article/view/17993.

Widiastiani, Nindry Sulistya. “Justifikasi Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Karena Efisiensi Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Dan Relevansinya Dengan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 19/PUU-IX/2011.” Jurnal Konstitusi 18, no. 2 (November 15, 2021): 413.

Winata, Muhammad Reza, and Intan Permata Putri. “Penegakan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 13/PUU-XV/2017 Mengenai Hak Mendapatkan Pekerjaan Dan Hak Membentuk Keluarga.” Jurnal Konstitusi 15, no. 4 (January 15, 2019): 858.

Wulandari, Safitri, and Atih Rohaeti Dariah. “Analisis Pengangguran Perkotaan.” Bandung Conference Series: Economics Studies 2, no. 2 (July 25, 2022). Accessed January 5, 2023. https://proceedings.unisba.ac.id/index.php/BCSES/article/view/2912.

Z, Ahmad Fahmi U., and Nugroho Arinto. “Analisis Yuridis Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Karena Pelanggaran Bersifat Mendesak Yang Terkualifikasi Perbuatan Pidana Tanpa Pemberitahuan.” Novum: Jurnal Hukum (2022): 11–27.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.