Legal Protection and Liability for Multimodal Transport Operators in The Transport of Dangerous and Toxic Goods
(1) Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia
(3) Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal
Abstract
Legal protection protects human rights that harm other people, and every human being is provided with this protection in order they can savor all of their legal right. In other words, legal protection is various legal remedies that must be provided by law enforcement officials to provide a sense of security, both physically and mentally as well as interference from various threats originating from any party. In contrast, transportation law can be interpreted as the overall legal norms and principles governing relationships and consequences of transportation law. This research shows that a form of legal protection for transportation service users can be provided in the form of preventive and repressive legal protection. The responsibility given to service users is in the form of compensation or compensation in the event of damage or loss of goods in the transportation process. There are two approaches used by researchers in this thesis, namely the Legislative Approach and the Conceptual Approach. In this legislative approach, the approach in legal research that provides an analytical point of view of problem-solving legal research is seen from the aspects of the legal concepts that lie behind it or even can be seen from the values contained in the normalization of regulation with the concepts used. Most of these approaches are used to understand the concepts related to normalization in legislation, whether they are in accordance with the spirit contained in the underlying legal concepts.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Hallawell, Robert ‘Allocation of Risk Between Cargo Owner and Carrier’, the American Journal of Comparative Law 27, no. 3 (1979).
La Porta, Rafael, ‘Investor Protection and Cororate Governance’, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 58 No. 1–2, 1999.
Lahmer, Verena, ‘Limitation of Liability and Denial of Limitation in Maritime Conventions: Past, Present and Future of Limitation of Liability’ in Peter Ehlers and Rainer Lagoni Responsibility and Liability in the Maritime Context (2009).
Mandelbaum, Samuel Robert ‘Creating Uniform Worldwide Liability Standards For Sea Carriage of Goods Under the Hague, COGSA, Visby And Hamburg Conventions’, Transport Law Journal 23, 1996
Martono, Pengantar Hukum Udara Nasional dan Internasional, (Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2007).
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, Penelitian Hukum (Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2017).
Pixa, Rand R. ‘The Hamburg Rules Fault Concept and Common Carrier Liability under U.S. Law’, Virginia Journal of Interpational Law 19, no. 2 (1979)
Prakoso, Djoko, Hukum Asuransi Indonesia, (Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2004).
Rahayu, Hukum Pengangkutan di Indonesia, (Jakarta: Citra Mentari, 2016).
Sardjono, H.R dan Hasbullah, Frieda Husni, Perbandingan Hukum Perdata, (Jakarta: Ind-Hill-Co, 1991).
Sidarta, Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen, (Jakarta: Grasindo, 2000).
Soedjiono, Wiwoho, Sarana-Sarana Penunjang Pengangkutan Laut, Aid To Navigation, (Jakarta: Bina Aksara, 1983).
Soekardono, Hukum Dagang Indonesia 2 edisi, (Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 1994).
Sweenly, Joseph C. ‘UNICTRAL and The Hamburg Rules: The Risk Allocation Problem in the Maritime Transport of Goods’, Journal Of Maritime Law and Commerce 22, no. 3 (1999).
Tjakranegara, Soegijatna, Hukum Pengangkutan Barang dan Penumpang, (Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 1995).
Villarreal Jr. Dewey R. ‘Carrier’s Responsibility to Cargo and cargo to carrier’, Tulane Journal XLV, (1971).
Yodo, Sutarman, Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen, (Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2010).
Zamora, ‘International carrier Liability’, The American Journal of Comparative Law 23, (1975)
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
