MODEL SUPERVISI AKADEMIK KELOMPOK BERBASIS THINK TALK WRITE UNTUK PENINGKATAN KEMAMPUAN GURU MENYUSUN KARYA TULIS ILMIAH
Abstract
Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menguji keefektifan model supervisi akademik kelompok teknik think talk write untuk pembimbingan penyusunan karya tulis ilmiah guru SMA Negeri di Kota Semarang. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan penelitian pengembangan modifikasi dari model Borg and Gall. Uji coba model dilakukan secara terbatas dengan melibatkan 1 orang pengawas SMA dan 10 orang guru bergolongan IIIa-IIIb dari sekolah di daerah binaannya. Keefektifan model diukur dari kemampuan guru menyusun karya tulis ilmiah yang didasarkan pada penilaian kualitas karya tulis ilmiah dengan kriteria nilai minimal adalah 80% dari skor total penilaian. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa model yang dikembangkan efektif untuk pembimbingan penyusunan karya tulis ilmiah berdasarkan indikator penilaian karya tulis ilmiah yang disusun oleh guru, yaitu 9 dari 10 guru (90%) berhasil menyusun karya tulis ilmiah dengan kategori baik. Rekomendasi dari penelitian ini adalah diperlukan komitmen yang tinggi dari pengawas dan guru terutama untuk masalah waktu.
Â
The purpose of this study is to measure the effectiveness of a group academic supervision think talk write technique model for guiding teacher in public secondary schools in Semarang to writing scientific paper. This study uses a modification of the Borg and Gall development research approach. This study involves 1 supervisor and 10 high school teachers IIIa-IIIb diversified in the area of school proxies. The experimental implementation of the model is measured by teacher’s observation. The effectiveness of the model measured by teacher’s competence in writing scientific paper based on the assessment of the quality of scientific papers with a minimum value criterion is 80% of the total score assessment. The results showed that the developed model effective for guiding teacher writing scientific papers based on the assessment indicators of scientific papers prepared by the teacher, which is 9 out of 10 teachers (90%) writing scientific paper successfully with good category. Recommendations from this research is the application of this model required commitment from supervisors and teachers especially for the problem of time.
References
Bijami, Maryam. 2013. “Peer Feedback in Leaning
English Writing: Advantages and Disadvantagesâ€.
Journal of Studies in Education. Vol. 3 (4):
-7.
Bjorke, Gerd and Braut, Geir. S. 2013. “Experiences
from Group Supervision Within an Alternative
Path for Qualifying University Teachers at a
Doctoral Levelâ€. Work Based Learning e-Journal
International. Vol. 3 (1): 1-12.
Borg, R.W. and Gall, M. 1989. Educational Research, an
Introduction. New York: Longman.
Byard, Roger W. 2013. “Scientific Writing: the Process
and the Pitfallsâ€. Springer: Forensic Sci Med
Pathol. Vol. 9: 285-286.
Greene, Myrna. L. 1992. “Teacher Supervision as a
Proffesional Development: Does it Work?â€
Journal Curriculum and Supervision. Vol 7 (2):
-148.
Huda, Miftahul. 2012. Model-model Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran
(Isu-isu Metodis dan Paradigmatis). Yogyakarta:
Pustaka Belajar.
Li, Chi-Sing. et al. 2008. “Six Thinking Hats for Group
Supervision with Counselor Internsâ€. Journal
of Humanities and Social Sciences. Vol. 2 (2): 1-8.
Lin, Grace Hui Chin and Chien, Paul Shih Chieh
Chien. 2009. “An Investigation into Effectiveness
of Peer Feedbackâ€. Journal of Applied Foreign
Languages Fortune Institute of Technology.
Vol 3: 79-87.
Mandell. 2006. “Supervisory Practices and Their Effect
on Teacher’s Professional Growthâ€. Dissertation.
University of Pittsburgh.
Maulidah, Nova, dkk. 2013. Think-Talk-Write (TTW)
Strategy for Teaching Descriptive Writing. Jurnal
Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris STKIP PGRI Sidoarjo.
Vol 1(1): 48-58.
Pidarta, Made. 2009. Supervisi Pendidikan Kontekstual.
Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Senkevitch, Emile, et al. 2011. “Improving Scientific
Research and Writing Skills through Peer Review
and Empirical Group Learningâ€. Journal
of Microbiology and Biology Education. P: 157-
Sudjana, Nana. 2012. Supervisi Pendidikan, Konsep dan
Aplikasinya bagi Pengawas Sekolah. Bekasi: Binamitra
Publishing.
Troia, et.al. 2012. “Relationship Between Writing
Motivation, Writing Activity, and Writing performance:
Effects of Grade, Sex, and Abilityâ€.
Sringer Science Business Media, Read Writ. Vol.
: 17-44.
Wardoyo, Slamet. 2011. “Pengaruh Kompetensi Supervisi
Akademik Pengawas Sekolah dan
Iklim Organisasi terhadap Profesionalisme
Guru SMP Negeri di Lampung Tengahâ€. Tesis.
Depok: Universitas Indonesia.
Yunianto, Eris. 2007. “Evaluasi Program Bimbingan
Teknis Penulisan Karya Ilmiah Pengembangan
Profesi Guru Sekolah Menengah di Provinsi
Jawa Tengahâ€. Tesis. Semarang: PPS Unnes.
Zulkarnaini. 2011. “Model Kooperatif Tipe Think Talk
Write (TTW) untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan
Menulis Karangan Deskripsi dan Berpikir
Kritisâ€. Jurnal UPI. Edisi Khusus, Agustus.
Hal.: 144 – 153.