TEACHER’S AND STUDENT’S PERCEPTIONS OF CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN TEACHING SPEAKING

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Herman Khunaivi
Rudi Hartono

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to find out the types of the spoken errors commonly made by the students in speaking, knowing the reasons do the students make same errors, describing how English teachers use corrective feedback to refine students’ errors, exploring the types of corrective feedback do the students mostly like, explaining the teachers’ and students’ perceptions towards corrective feedback.The types of this study was descriptive qualitative study. The findings indicated that errors mostly made by the students were pronunciation error, grammatical error and lexical error, why did they make same errors because the students got fossilization, corrcetive feedbacks were used to refine students speaking were explicit correction, repetition and reformulation, corrective feedbacks that the students mostly like were explicit correction, repetition and pronunciation, the teachers perceptions towards corrective feedback were corrective feedback was to know the lacks of the students speaking, the teachers could give the students feedbacks in order not to be fossilized. by giving feedback appropraitely it was believed the students would not be fossilized. The students’ perceptionson corrective feedback were they had very good responses about corrective feedback that were given by the teachers in the classroom.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Khunaivi, H., & Hartono, R. (1). TEACHER’S AND STUDENT’S PERCEPTIONS OF CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN TEACHING SPEAKING. English Education Journal, 5(2). Retrieved from https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/9799

References

Chu, Ruili. 2011. Effects of Teacher’s Corrective Feedback on Accuracy in the Oral English of English-Majors College Students. Journals of Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol. 1, No. 5, pp. 454-459.
Eini, Massoume; Gorjian, Bahman and Pazhakh, Abdolreza. 2013. The Effect of Corrective Feedback Modalities on SecondLanguage Post-Speaking Activities Among Iranian Pre-Intermediate EFL Learners. Journals of Advances in Asian Social Science (AASS) 810. Vol. 4, No. 2.
Ellis, Rod. 1994. The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Auckland: Oxford University Press.
Harmer, Jeremy. 2003. The Practice of English Language Teaching (3^th Ed.). Edinburgh: Longman.
Harmer, Jeremy. 2007. How to Teach English. Oxford: Pearson Education Limited.
Henderson and Karr-Kidwell. 1998. CorrectiveAssessment: An Extensive Literary Review and Recommendations for Administrators. Texas: Texas Woman's University.
Krashen, SD. 1983. Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning. New York: Pergamon Press.
Nunan, David. 2003. Practical English Language Teaching. New York: The McGraw-Hill.
Lange, Camilla Ferm. 2009. Corrective Feedback during communicative activities A study of recasts as a feedback method to correct spoken English.
Razavi, Arezou and Naghizadeh, Mohammad. 2014. Corrective Feedback in Speaking in Relation to Error Types in Iranian EFL Classrooms. International Journal of Emerging Investigations in Applied and Basic Sciences. Vol. 1, No, 1, pp. 148-160.
Richards, J. C. and Rodgers, T. S. 2008. Teaching Listening and Speaking from Theory to Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Safari, Parvin. 2013. A Descriptive Study on Corrective Feedback and Learners‟ Uptake during Interactions in a Communicative EFL Class. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol. 3, No. 7, pp. 1165-1175.
Soenoewati, Does Ichnatun. 2010. Teachers’ Corrective Feedback in the English as a Foreign Language (EFL) Speaking Class at Sekolah Indonesia Bangkok (SIB), Thailand in the Academic of 2009/2010. Unpublished Thesis. Semarang: Program Pascasarjana Unnes.