STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COLLABORATIVE REASONING DISCUSSIONS (CR)

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Download
PDF
Statistic
Vol 5 No 2 (2015)

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Riana Permatasari
Sultan Agung Islamic University
Dwi Anggani L. Bharati
Postgraduate Program, Semarang State University, Indonesia

Abstract

The present study was a part of larger research aimed at investigating the students’ perception on the implementation of collaborative reasoning discussions (CR) to improve their participation in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) speaking class. This study was qualitative study under action research approach conducted in a single classroom consisting of 21 undergraduate students of Economic Faculty majoring management. The data were gathered through observations and open-ended questionnaires during three cycles. The collected data were further analyzed using inductive analysis. The results indicated that 100% students agreed that CR provided them more chances to participate during the teaching and learning process. Moreover, they also stated besides giving them more chances to participate, CR brought them other benefits such as developing their critical thinking and collaborative skill, and increasing their motivation in learning English. In conclusion, the students had positive perception on the implementation of CR in their EFL speaking class.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Permatasari, R., & Bharati, D. (1). STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COLLABORATIVE REASONING DISCUSSIONS (CR). English Education Journal, 5(2). Retrieved from https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/9800

References

Aidinlou, N. A., & Ghobadi, S. 2012. Examination of relationship between factors affecting on oral participation of ELT students and language development: A structural equation modeling approach. International Journal of English Linguistics, 2(5), 131-141.
Anderson, R. C., Chinn, C., Waggoner, M., & Nguyen, K. 1998.Intellectualy stimulating story discussion.Literact for all: Isssues in teaching and Learning, 170-186.
Belchamber, R. 2007. Overcoming Asian stereotypes: Opportunities for enhancing students participation in Chinese ELT classes. Reflections on English Language Teaching, 6(2), 59-63.
Chinn, C. L., Anderson, R. C., & Waggoner, M. A. 2001.Patterns of discourse in two kinds of literature discussion.Reading Research Quarterly, 36(4), 378-411.
Clark, A. M., Anderson, R. C., Kuo, L. J., Kim, I. H., Archodidou, A., & Nguyen-Jahiel, K. 2003. Collaborative reasoning: Expanding ways for children to talk and think in school. Educational Psychology Review, 15(2), 181-198.
Delaney, T. (2012). Quality and quantity of oral participation and English proficiency gains.Language Teaching Research, 16(4), 467-482.
Dong, T., Anderson, R. C., Kim, I. L., Li, Y. 2008.Collaborative reasoning in China and Korea.Reading Research Quarterly, 34 (4), 400-424.
Exley, B. (2005). Learner characteristics of Asian EFL students: Exception to the ‘norm’. In Young, J, Eds. Proceedings Pleasure Passion Provocation. Joint National Conference AATE & ALEA 2005, 1-16.
Jadalah, M. 2009.Teacher scaffodling moves and children’s talk in collaborative reasoning discussions. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest. UMI number 3392077.
Khafiddin. 2013. Improving students’ participation in speaking class through role play (The case at grade XI of State Senior High School 1 Pemalang in the academic year 2012/2013). English Education Journal, 3(2), 94-100.
Li, X. & Jia, X. 2006. Why dont’t you speak up?: East Asian Students’ participation patterns in American and Chinese ESL classroom. Intercultural Communication Studies, 15(1), 192-206.
Lie, A. 2007. Education policy and EFL curriculum in Indonesia: Between the commitment to competence and the quest for higher test score. TEFLIN Journal, 18(1), 1-14.

















Lin, T. Anderson, R. C., Jadallah, M. Kuo, L. Wu, X., Hummel, J. E., Dong, T. 2012. Children’s use of analogy during collaborative reasoning.Child Development, 83(4). 1429-1443.
Mingzhi, X. 2005.Enhancing interaction in our EFL classroom.CELEA Journal, 28(2), 56-62.
Moshman, D., & Geil, M. 1998. Collaborative reasoning: Evidence for collective rationality. Thinking and Reasoning, 4 (3), 231-248.
Murray, H. G., & Lang, M. 1997. Does classroom participation improve students learning? Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20, 7-9.
Rogoff, B. 2003. The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford University Press.
Vygotsky, L. 1986. Thought and language. Massachusetts: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Wu. X. 2009 .Improving children’s engagement and learning through free flowing discussions: Impact of Collaborative reasoning discussion. (Doctoral dissertation).Retrieved from ProQuest. UMI number 3395544.
Zhang, J. 2009. Improving English language learners’ oral and written language through collaborative discussions.(Doctoral dissertation).Retrieved from ProQuest. UMI number 3363125.
Zulfikar, T. 2009. The making of Indonesian education: An overview on empowering Indonesian teachers. Journal of Indonesian Social Sciences and Humanities.2, 13–39.