MODEL SUPERVISI AKADEMIK KELOMPOK BERBASIS THINK TALK WRITE UNTUK PENINGKATAN KEMAMPUAN GURU MENYUSUN KARYA TULIS ILMIAH

  • Fauziah Asri Latifah Prodi Manajemen Pendidikan, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Samsudi Samsudi Prodi Manajemen Pendidikan, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Masrukan Masrukan Prodi Manajemen Pendidikan, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Negeri Semarang
Keywords: group academic supervision, think talk write technique, scientific writing

Abstract

Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menguji keefektifan model supervisi akademik kelompok teknik think talk write untuk pembimbingan penyusunan karya tulis ilmiah guru SMA Negeri di Kota Semarang. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan penelitian pengembangan modifikasi dari model Borg and Gall. Uji coba model dilakukan secara terbatas dengan melibatkan 1 orang pengawas SMA dan 10 orang guru bergolongan IIIa-IIIb dari sekolah di daerah binaannya. Keefektifan model diukur dari kemampuan guru menyusun karya tulis ilmiah yang didasarkan pada penilaian kualitas karya tulis ilmiah dengan kriteria nilai minimal adalah 80% dari skor total penilaian. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa model yang dikembangkan efektif untuk pembimbingan penyusunan karya tulis ilmiah berdasarkan indikator penilaian karya tulis ilmiah yang disusun oleh guru, yaitu 9 dari 10 guru (90%) berhasil menyusun karya tulis ilmiah dengan kategori baik. Rekomendasi dari penelitian ini adalah diperlukan komitmen yang tinggi dari pengawas dan guru terutama untuk masalah waktu.

 

The purpose of this study is to measure the effectiveness of a group academic supervision think talk write technique model for guiding teacher in public secondary schools in Semarang to writing scientific paper. This study uses a modification of the Borg and Gall development research approach. This study involves 1 supervisor and 10 high school teachers IIIa-IIIb diversified in the area of school proxies. The experimental implementation of the model is measured by teacher’s observation. The effectiveness of the model measured by teacher’s competence in writing scientific paper based on the assessment of the quality of scientific papers with a minimum value criterion is 80% of the total score assessment. The results showed that the developed model effective for guiding teacher writing scientific papers based on the assessment indicators of scientific papers prepared by the teacher, which is 9 out of 10 teachers (90%) writing scientific paper successfully with good category. Recommendations from this research is the application of this model required commitment from supervisors and teachers especially for the problem of time.

References

Bijami, Maryam. 2013. “Peer Feedback in Leaning

English Writing: Advantages and Disadvantagesâ€.

Journal of Studies in Education. Vol. 3 (4):

-7.

Bjorke, Gerd and Braut, Geir. S. 2013. “Experiences

from Group Supervision Within an Alternative

Path for Qualifying University Teachers at a

Doctoral Levelâ€. Work Based Learning e-Journal

International. Vol. 3 (1): 1-12.

Borg, R.W. and Gall, M. 1989. Educational Research, an

Introduction. New York: Longman.

Byard, Roger W. 2013. “Scientific Writing: the Process

and the Pitfallsâ€. Springer: Forensic Sci Med

Pathol. Vol. 9: 285-286.

Greene, Myrna. L. 1992. “Teacher Supervision as a

Proffesional Development: Does it Work?â€

Journal Curriculum and Supervision. Vol 7 (2):

-148.

Huda, Miftahul. 2012. Model-model Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran

(Isu-isu Metodis dan Paradigmatis). Yogyakarta:

Pustaka Belajar.

Li, Chi-Sing. et al. 2008. “Six Thinking Hats for Group

Supervision with Counselor Internsâ€. Journal

of Humanities and Social Sciences. Vol. 2 (2): 1-8.

Lin, Grace Hui Chin and Chien, Paul Shih Chieh

Chien. 2009. “An Investigation into Effectiveness

of Peer Feedbackâ€. Journal of Applied Foreign

Languages Fortune Institute of Technology.

Vol 3: 79-87.

Mandell. 2006. “Supervisory Practices and Their Effect

on Teacher’s Professional Growthâ€. Dissertation.

University of Pittsburgh.

Maulidah, Nova, dkk. 2013. Think-Talk-Write (TTW)

Strategy for Teaching Descriptive Writing. Jurnal

Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris STKIP PGRI Sidoarjo.

Vol 1(1): 48-58.

Pidarta, Made. 2009. Supervisi Pendidikan Kontekstual.

Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Senkevitch, Emile, et al. 2011. “Improving Scientific

Research and Writing Skills through Peer Review

and Empirical Group Learningâ€. Journal

of Microbiology and Biology Education. P: 157-

Sudjana, Nana. 2012. Supervisi Pendidikan, Konsep dan

Aplikasinya bagi Pengawas Sekolah. Bekasi: Binamitra

Publishing.

Troia, et.al. 2012. “Relationship Between Writing

Motivation, Writing Activity, and Writing performance:

Effects of Grade, Sex, and Abilityâ€.

Sringer Science Business Media, Read Writ. Vol.

: 17-44.

Wardoyo, Slamet. 2011. “Pengaruh Kompetensi Supervisi

Akademik Pengawas Sekolah dan

Iklim Organisasi terhadap Profesionalisme

Guru SMP Negeri di Lampung Tengahâ€. Tesis.

Depok: Universitas Indonesia.

Yunianto, Eris. 2007. “Evaluasi Program Bimbingan

Teknis Penulisan Karya Ilmiah Pengembangan

Profesi Guru Sekolah Menengah di Provinsi

Jawa Tengahâ€. Tesis. Semarang: PPS Unnes.

Zulkarnaini. 2011. “Model Kooperatif Tipe Think Talk

Write (TTW) untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan

Menulis Karangan Deskripsi dan Berpikir

Kritisâ€. Jurnal UPI. Edisi Khusus, Agustus.

Hal.: 144 – 153.

How to Cite
Latifah, F., Samsudi, S., & Masrukan, M. (1). MODEL SUPERVISI AKADEMIK KELOMPOK BERBASIS THINK TALK WRITE UNTUK PENINGKATAN KEMAMPUAN GURU MENYUSUN KARYA TULIS ILMIAH. Educational Management, 3(1). Retrieved from https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eduman/article/view/4357
Section
Articles