Indonesian Penal Policy: Toward Indonesian Criminal Law Reform Based on Pancasila

Article Sidebar

Fulltext (PDF)
Published Dec 9, 2018
DOI https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v3i02.27510

Main Article Content

Mokhammad Najih
Faculty of Law Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang (UMM)

Abstract

Criminal law enforcement in Indonesia has always been a very crucial and the sexiest issue. Almost 35 years the idea of criminal law enforcement has been carried out and so far several concepts of the National Criminal Code have been born which continue to experience developmental dynamics that are quite interesting to study. The desire to realize a better criminal law and be able to fulfill the aspirations of the people is the ideal criminal law politics (penal policy). National Criminal Law must have characteristics that are typical of Indonesia, authentic and original, encompassing customary law, systems of values ​​and beliefs, characteristics of modern states and international values. Pancasila as the source of all sources of law, which has not received serious attention needs to be used as a recommendation for the paradigm of penal reform. Pancasila has at least the main principles that must be implemented in all formulations of criminal legislation. These principles are among others, principles based on the source of religious values (Godhead / Divine God), the value of humanity (humanism), the value of unity and peace, the value of democracy and the value of social justice. Therefore, Indonesian criminal law must have values that are based on Pancasila, both in the form of legal norms (addresaat norm), on the types of acts that are regulated (straafbar), in the form of punishment or sanctions (straafmaat), as well as regulatory aspects and implementation of law enforcement  law (formal law).

Article Details

How to Cite
Najih, M. (2018). Indonesian Penal Policy: Toward Indonesian Criminal Law Reform Based on Pancasila. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 3(2), 149-174. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v3i02.27510
Issue
Vol 3 No 2 (2018): Crimes and Society: General Issues on Criminal Law in Indonesia
Section
Research Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

All writings published in this journal are personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Author(s) retain copyrights under the licence of  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0). 

References

Arief, Barda Nawawi. Beberapa Aspek Kebijakan Penegakan dan Pengembangan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti, 2005.

Bahiej, Ahmad. “Selamat Datang KUHP Baru Indonesia! (Telaah atas RUU KUHP Tahun 2004)”, Sosio-Religia, 2006, 6(1): 1-22.

Budiardjo, Miriam. Aneka Pemikiran tentang Kuasa dan Wibawa. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan, 1984.

Huntington, Samuel P. Partisipasi Politik di Negara Berkembang. Jakarta: Rajawali, 1994.

Jhoner, Franko. “Pancasila: 5 Ways of Life for Indonesian People”, International Journal of Multidisciplinary Approach and Studies, 2018, 5(1): 19-23.

Kasim, Ifdal. “Ke Arah Mana Pembaruan KUHP?: Tinjaun Kritis atas RUU KUHP”, on Position Paper Advokasi RUU KUHP Seri 7. Jakarta: ELSAM, 2005.

Kadish, Joshua D, Stephen J. Schulhofer, and Rachel E. Barkow. Criminal Law and Its Processes: Cases and Materials. New York: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, 2017.

Kathleen Daly, “What is Restorative Justice? Fresh Answers to a Vexed Question”, Victims & Offenders, 2016, 11(1): 9-29, DOI: 10.1080/15564886.2015.1107797.

Kusuma, Mahmud. Menyelami Semangat Hukum Progresif: Terapi Paradikmatik Bagi Lemahnya Hukum di Indonesia. Yoyakarta: Antonylib, 2009.

Law Number 12 of 2011 concerning Laws and Regulations Establishment
Luthan, Salman. “Kebijakan Kriminalisasi dalam Reformasi Hukum Pidana”, Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 1999, 6 (11): 1-12.

Lukito, Ratno. Tradisi Hukum Indoensia. Cianjur: IMR Press, 2013.

Mahfud MD. Politik Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: LP3ES, 2008.

Maghfirah, Aliflanya Arisandy, Diny Arista Risandy, and Nurindah Hilimi. “Sulh’ in Islamic Criminal Law as the Form of Restorative Justice: A New Framework in Indonesian Criminal Law.” Proceedings Scientific Cooperations, 2nd International Conference on Social Sciences of Istambul Turkey, 2nd-3rd of April, 2016: 221-223, retrieved from http://ase-scoop.org/papers/IWLP-2016/6.Maghfirah_IWLP.pdf

Miller, Wright. The Encyclopedia of Criminology Vol. I. London: Sage Publication, 2003.

Moeljatno. “Atas Dasar atau Asas-asas Apakah Hendaknya Hukum Pidana Kita Dibangun?”, Paper, on Congress II Persahi, 25 July 1964, Surabaya, pp. 38-40.

Muladi. “Proyeksi Hukum Pidana Materiil pada Masa yang akan datang”, Paper, on Professor Inaguration at Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, 27 April 1990.

Mulder, A. ”Strafrechtspolitiek”, Delikt en Delinkwent, 1980, 10(5): 331-341.

Muncie, McLaughlin. The Sage dictionary of Criminology. London: Sage Publication, 2002.

Najih, Mokhammad. Politik Hukum Pidana: Konsep Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana dalam Cita Negara Hukum. Malang: Setara Press, 2014.

Nur, Turiman Fatchurrahman. “Pancasila Sebagai Sumber segala Sumber Hukum Negara dan Hirarki Peraturan Perundang-undangan Berdasarkan UU No. 12/2011”, Online Article, 2013, retrieved from http://rajawaligarudapancasila.blogspot.com/2013/06/pancasila-sebagai-sumber-segala-sumber.html?m=0 accessed on 17 October 2013.

Onneweer, A.W. “De Wet Mulder in uityoering: de praktijk is sterker dan de leer”, Delikt en Delinkwent, 1994, 24(4): 360-377.

Prijatno, Dwija. Kebijakan Legislasi tentang Sistem Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi di Indonesia.Bandung: Utomo, 2004.

Reksodiputro, Mardjono. Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Lembaga Kriminologi UI, 1995.

-----------------------. Menyelaraskan Pembaharuan Hukum. Jakarta: KHN, 1995.

Saleh, K. Wantjik. Seminar Hukum Nasional 1963-1979. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1980.

Siswanto. “Pancasila as Strategy to Prevent Proxy War”, Jurnal Pertahanan, 2017, 3(2): 141-162.

Soge, Paulinus, Cesar Anthonio Munthe. “The Impact of Pancasila as the State Ideology of Indonesia toward the Provision on Death Penalty in the Penal Code Bill”, Justitia et Pax Jurnal Hukum, 2018, 34(1): 33-49.

Subandi H, Al Marsudi. Pancasila dan UUD’45 dalam Paradigma Reformasi. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2003.

Sudarto. Hukum dan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Alumni, 1981a.

-------------------. Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Alumni, 1981b.

-------------------. Hukum dan Pembangunan Masyarakat. Bandung: Sinar Baru, 1983.

Sudjito, Tatit Hariyanti. “Pancasila as a Scientific Paradigm for Studying Legal Pluralism in Indonesia: a Literary Perspective”, SHS Web of Conferences, The 1st International Conference on Law, Governance and Social Justice (ICoL GaS 2018), EDP Sciences, 2018, 54 (02012): 1-8, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20185402012.

Sugara, Robi. “The Future of Pancasila as a Philosophy, a Life Vision, and an Ideology of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia”, Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), Third International Conference on Social and Political Sciences (ICSPS 2017), Atlantis Press, 2018, Vol. 129: 247-249.

Taufiq, Muhammad, Sarsiti, and Rindha Widyaningsih. “Forms and Mechanism of Law Dispute Resolution Using the Principle of Pancasila Based on Local Wisdom”, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, January 2016, 16(1); 24-30.
The 1945 Constitution (UUD 1945).

Wisnubroto, Al. Kebijakan Hukum Pidana dalam Penanggulangan Penyalahgunaan Komputer. Yogjakarta: Universitas Atmajaya, 1999.

Widjoyanto, Bambang. “Politik Hukum Pidana dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional”, Online Handout, 2014, retrieved from http://www.bphn.go.id/data/documents/politik_hukum_pidana_dalam_sistem_hukum_nasional_revisi.ppt, accessed on 7 November 2013

Yusriando. “Implementasi Mediasi Penal Sebagai Perwujudan Nilai-Nilai Pancasila Guna Mendukung Supremasi Hukum dalam Rangka Pembangunan Nasional”, Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, 2015, 2(1): 23-45.