The Constitutional Court Ultra Petita as a Protection Form of Economic Rights in Pancasila Justice

Main Article Content

Emy Hajar Abra
Rofi Wahanisa

Abstract

Social justice concept has been clearly emphasized at Pancasila (the five fundamental values of Indonesia) as one of common values of Indonesia society. Pancasila also recognized as the philosophical grondslag which makes Pancasila as a reference of all Indonesian citizens and State Action, including in governance. The concept of social justice in Pancasila implies that any natural resource management that has the potential to prosper and affect the Indonesian people as a whole must be controlled by the State as well as used for the greatest prosperity of the people. This paper is intended to analyze, describe, and examine the Constitutional Court Decision concerning to social justice especially in terms of economic rights. This paper discusses various decisions of the Constitutional Court that are ultra petita. This paper illuminated and highlighted that in two Constitutional Court Decisions on Water Resources and the Decision on the Electricity Law and the Water Resources Law of the Constitutional Court in its decision to make an ultra petita decision by canceling the entire two laws, because that the article being tested is the heart of the law, thus seriously affecting the implementation of other articles in the law. Therefore, with the ultra petita decision, in the future, the Constitutional Court is expected to be more progressive and responsive in seeing the problems that occur, especially related to the basic economic needs of the Indonesian people. Because the Constitutional Court is the guardian of the constitution whose main function is to maintain Indonesia's highest legal order (constitution).

Article Details

How to Cite
Abra, E. H., & Wahanisa, R. (2020). The Constitutional Court Ultra Petita as a Protection Form of Economic Rights in Pancasila Justice. JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies), 5(1), 187-224. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v5i1.35965
Section
Review Articles
Author Biographies

Emy Hajar Abra, Faculty of Law, Universitas Riau Kepulauan

Emy Hajar Abra is a Lecturer at Faculty of Law Universitas Riau Kepulauan, Batam, Indonesia. Her research interests are concerning to Constitutional Law, as well as constitutional court decision. She has been involved in many research projects concerning to constitutional law and various related subjects on legal studies.

Rofi Wahanisa, Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Rofi Wahanisa is a Lecturer at Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia. She interested in some area of legal studies, such as Natural Resources Law, Politics of Natural Resources, State Administrative Law, and Agrarian Law. Besides as Lecturer and Researcher, She also working as Director of International Cooperation Unit at Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang.

References

A.A.Qodri. (1987). Sebuah Potret Teori dan Praktek Keadilan Dalam Sejarah Pemerintahan Muslim. Yogyakarta: PLP2M.

Abadi, S. (2015). Ultra Petita dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi 12(3), 586-603.

Abdillah, K. (2019). Progresivitas Hukum dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010. Jurnal Yuridis 6(1), 94-111.

Ahmadi, A. (2018). Kontroversi Penerapan Hukum: Telaah Sintesa Hukum Represif, Hukum Otonom dan Hukum Responsif. Al-'Adl 9(1), 1-18.

Ali, M. (2016). Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Penafsiran Hukum yang Progresif. Jurnal Konstitusi 7(1), 67-90.

Arliman, L. (2018). Peranan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum di dalam Perkembangan Ilmu Hukum di Indonesia. Soumatera Law Review 1(1), 112-132.

Armia, M.S. (2018). Ultra Petita and the Threat to Constitutional Justice: The Indonesian Experience. Intellectual Discourse 26(2), 903-930.

Askari, H., & Mirakhor, A. (2020). Introduction and Summary of the Conception of Justice in Islam. In Conceptions of Justice from Islam to the Present. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

Askari, H., & Mirakhor, A. (2020). Conception of Justice in the Age of Enlightenment. In Conceptions of Justice from Islam to the Present. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

Askari, H., & Mirakhor, A. (2020). Conception of Justice from Rawls to Sen to the Present. In Conceptions of Justice from Islam to the Present. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

Asshiddiqie, J. (2019). Pancasila dan Empat Pilar Kehidupan Berbangsa. Retrieved from www.jimly.com/makalah/namafile/184/PANCASILA_DAN_4_PILAR_BARU.pdf&sa=U&ved=0ahUKEwiUiIr7je3XAhUaTo8KHZJ5Al0QFggRMAI&usg=A0vVaw3tRbm6zstI6KLik9h-zM_

Asshiddiqie, J. (2011). Membudayakan Nilai-Nilai Pancasila dan Kaedah-Kaedah Undang-Undang Dasar Negara RI Tahun 1945. Prosiding Kongres Pancasila III.

Asshiddiqie, J. (2011, November). Gagasan Negara Hukum Indonesia. Paper Presented in the National Legal Development Planning Dialogue Forum Organized by the National Law Development Board of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights (2011, November).

Asshiddiqie, J. (2011). Undang-Undang Dasar 1945: Konstitusi Kemajemukan Berbangsa dan Bernegara. Paper Presented at the Gus Dur Memorial Lecture hosted by the Indonesian Conference on Religion and Peace (ICRP), Jakarta.

Barzun, C. L. (2017). Jerome Frank, Lon Fuller, and a Romantic Pragmatism. Yale JL & Human. 29(1), 129-158.

Basuki, U. (2015). Politik Hukum Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Membatalkan Konsep Empat Pilar sebagai Upaya Mendudukkan Pancasila Sebagai Dasar Negara. Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum 4(2), 377-404.

Chandranegara, I.S. (2016). Ultra Petita dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang dan Jalan Mencapai Keadilan Konstitusional. Jurnal Konstitusi 9(1), 27-48.

Chriss, J. J. (2017). On Karl N. Llewellyn, Jurisprudence: Realism in Theory and Practice. In Classic Writings in Law and Society (pp. 105-114). London: Routledge.

Cotterrell, R. (2017). Sociological jurisprudence: juristic thought and social inquiry. Routledge.

Coyne, B., & Reich, R. (2018). John Rawls. In International Handbook of Philosophy of Education. Cham: Springer.

Dagan, H. (2017). Contemporary legal realism. In Encyclopedia for Law and Social Philosophy, Mortimer Sellers and Stephan Kirste (eds.), New York: Springer.

Dewantara, A.W. (2015). Pancasila dan Multikulturalisme Indonesia. Studia Philosophica Et Theologica 15(2), 109-126.

Dhanda, A. (2017). Conversations between the Proponents of the New Paradigm of Legal Capacity. International Journal of Law in Context 13(1), 87-95.

Edmundson, W. A. (2017). John Rawls: Reticent Socialist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ehrlich, E., & Ziegert, K. A. (2017). Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law. London: Routledge.

Gunawan, Y., & Kristian, K. (2015). Perkemangan Konsep Negara Hukum dan Negara Hukum Pancasila. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Han, L. (2018). Responding to the Society, Leap of the Legal Reform: from Repression to Response: Review on Law and Society in Transition: toward Responsive Law. Tribune of Political Science and Law 2(1), 15-28.

Haliim, W. (2016). Demokrasi Deliberatif Indonesia: Konsep Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Membentuk Demokrasi dan Hukum yang Responsif. Masyarakat Indonesia 42(1), 19-30.

Hanke, E., Scaff, L. A., & Whimster, S. (Eds.). (2019). The Oxford Handbook of Max Weber. Oxford University Press.

Hayati, M. (2019). Analisis Yuridis Pro Kontra Pendapat Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang Ultra Petita. Jurnal Wasaka 7(1), 30-30.

Huda, M.C. (2020). Relasi Islam dan Negara (Studi Politik Hukum di Indonesia). PAX HUMANA 6(2), 154-172.

Huda, N., & Dimyati, K. (2018). Base Transcedental Value on Judge’s Decision (Study of Basic Perspective of Pancasila State). Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 18(2), 139-148.

Hull, N. E., & Hull, N. E. (1997). Roscoe Pound and Karl Llewellyn: Searching for an American Jurisprudence. University of Chicago Press.

Ibrahim, J. (2007). Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.

Ismail, F. (2018). Religion, State, and Ideology in Indonesia: A Historical Account of The Acceptance of Pancasila as The Basis of Indonesian State. Indonesian Journal of Interdisciplinary Islamic Studies (IJIIS) 1(2), 19-58.

Kaelan, K. (2015). Liberalisasi Ideologi Negara Pancasila. Yogyakarta: Paradigma.

Kamali, M.H. (2017). Shariah Law. Bloomsbury, London: Oneworld Publications.

Kamali, M.H. (2018). Reading the Signs: A Qur’anic Perspective on Thinking. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT).

Kamali, M.H. (2018). Classical Islamic Political Thought and its Contemporary Relevance. Islam and Civilisational Renewal ICR Journal 9(4), 19-46.

Kamali, M.H. (2016). Peace in the Islamic Tradition: One Vision, Multiple Pathways." Islam and Civilisational Renewal ICR Journal 7(2), 115-126.

Kamali, H.M. (1999). Freedom, Equality and Justice In Islam. Cambridge: The Islamic Text Society.

Lailam, T. (2016). Pro-Kontra Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Menguji Undang-Undang yang Mengatur Eksistensinya. Jurnal Konstitusi 12(4), 795-824.

Lestari, S.E. (2018). Pancasila dalam Konstruksi Sistem Hukum Nasional. Negara dan Keadilan 7(2), 85-90.

Llewellyn, K. N. (2016). The Common Law Tradition: Deciding Appeals. New Orleans, Louisiana: Quid Pro Books.

Mahfud MD, M. (August, 2014). Keadilan Substantif. KORAN SINDO, August 30.

Mahfud MD, M. (September, 2014). Kelirumologi Keadilan Substantif. KORAN SINDO, September 14.

Mahfud MD, M. (2003). Peran Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Mengawal Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara. Retrieved from http://www. mahfudmd. com/public/makalah/Makalah_21. pdf.

Mertokusumo, S. (2013). Mengenal Hukum: Suatu Pengantar. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Michelman, F. I. (2018). Constitution (Written or Unwritten): Legitimacy and Legality in the Thought of John Rawls. Ratio Juris 31(4), 379-395.

Morag-Levine, N. (2018). Sociological Jurisprudence and The Spirit of The Common Law. In The Oxford Handbook of Legal History. Oxford University Press.

Morfit, M. (1981). Pancasila: The Indonesian state ideology according to the new order government. Asian Survey 21(8), 838-851.

Mulyani, S. (2018). Hak Ex Officio Hakim dalam Perkara Hadanah Kaitannya dengan Asas Ultra Petitum Partium: Analisis Putusan nomor 0864/Pdt. G/2017/PA. Badg. Dissertation. Bandung: UIN Sunan Gunung Djati.

Musallam, A.A. (2018). Sayyid Qutb: The Emergence of an Islamist Calling for Social Justice in Islam, 1906–1948. Journal of South Asian and Middle Eastern Studies 42(1), 1-27.

Nonet, P., Selznick, P., & Kagan, R.A. (2017). Law and society in transition: Toward Responsive Law. London: Routledge.

Nonet, P., & Selznick, P. (2001). Toward Responsive Law: Law and Society in Transition. New Brunswick: Transactions Publishers.

Petrus, B. (2013). Ideologi Hukum Refleksi Filsafat Atas Ideologi Dibalik Hukum. Bogor: Insan Merdeka.

Pound, R. (2006). New paths of the law: first lectures in the Roscoe Pound lectureship series. The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd.

Pound, R. (1997). Social control through law. Transaction Publishers.

Pound, Roscoe. "Law in books and law in action." American Law Review. 44(1) (1910): 12-43.

Prasetianingsih, R. (2011). Penafsiran Konstitusi oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi Menuju Keadilan Substantif. Jurnal Konstitusi 3(1), 133-157.

Prasetyo, T., & Barkatullah, A.H. (2012). Filsafat, Teori dan Ilmu Hukum : Pemikiran Menuju Masyarakat Yang Berkeadilan dan Bermartabat. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Rahemtulla, S. (2017). Qur'an of the oppressed: Liberation Theology and Gender Justice in Islam. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ranuhandoko, I. P. M., & Grafika, S. (2000). Terminologi Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Rahardjo, S. (2009). Hukum Progresif: Sebuah Sintesa Hukum Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.

Rahardjo, S. (2010). Membedah Hukum Progresif. Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas.

Rahardjo, S. (2005). Hukum Progresif: Hukum yang Membebaskan. Jurnal Hukum Progresif 1(1), 1-24.

Ravena, D. (2014). Wacana Konsep Hukum Progresif dalam Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika 23(2), 155-166.

Rawls, J. (1973). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: The Belknap Press.

Rosadi, O. (2018). Ide Bernegara dalam Konstitusi Indonesia: Rekonstruksi Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 Pasca Amandemen. Pagaruyuang Law Journal 1(2), 277-294.

Rosen, L. (2018). Islam and the Rule of Justice: Image and Reality in Muslim Law and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Roth, G., & Weber, M. (1976). History and sociology in the work of Max Weber. The British Journal of Sociology, 27(3), 306-318.

Rubaie, A., Nurjaya, n., & Ridwan, M. (2015). Considerations Constitutional Court of Indonesia Decide Verdict Ultra Petita. Academic Research International 6(1), 412-432.

Rubaie, A. (2018). Dilematis Hukum Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Perspektif Putusan. Ajudikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2(2), 117-126.

Salman, O., & Susanto, A.F. (2008). Teori Hukum Mengingat, Mengumpulkan dan Membuka Kembali. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.

Sarifudin, S., & Abdillah, K. (2019). Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 dalam Bingkai Hukum Progresif. Jurnal Yuridis 6(1), 94-111.

Sarip, S., & Wahid, A. (2018). Kemajemukan Visi Negara Hukum Pancasila dalam Misi Hukum Negara Indonesia. Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2(2), 109-124.

Sarmadi, A.S. (2012). Membebaskan Positivisme Hukum ke Ranah Hukum Progresif (Studi Pembacaan Teks Hukum Bagi Penegak Hukum). Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 12(2), 331-343.

Sasmito, H.A. (2011). Putusan Ultra Petita Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Pengujian Undang-undang (Suatu Perspektif Hukum Progresif). Law Reform 6(2), 55-81.

Sasmito, H.A (2017). Ultra Petita Decision of Constitutional Court on Judicial Review (The Perspective of Progressive Law). JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies)1(1), 47-68. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v1i01.16568.

Sastroatmodjo, S. (2005). Konfigurasi Hukum Progresif. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 8(2), 185-201.

Siallagan, H. (2010). Masalah Putusan Ultra Petita dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang. Mimbar Hukum 22(1), 71-83.

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (1990). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Syamsudin, M., & SH, M. (2011). Konstruksi Baru Budaya Hukum Hakim Berbasis Hukum Progressif. Kencana: Jakarta.

Tamanaha, B. Z. (2017). A Realistic Theory of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tamanaha, B. Z. (2019). Sociological Jurisprudence Past and Present. Law & Social Inquiry 43(1), 1-28.

Tenbruck, F. H., & Weber, M. (1980). The problem of thematic unity in the works of Max Weber. The British Journal of Sociology 31(3), 316-351.

The 1945 Constitution of Republic of Indonesia.

Thompson, D.F. (2018). John Rawls, Political Liberalism. In Oxford Handbooks Online. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Utsman, S. (2008). Menuju Penegakan Hukum Responsif: Konsep Philippe Nonet & Philip Selznick: Perbandingan Civil Law System & Common Law System, Spiral Kekerasan & Penegakan Hukum. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Van den Hoven, P. (2017). Analysing Discursive Practices in Legal Research: How a Single Remark Implies a Paradigm. Utrecht L. Rev. 13(1), 43-78.

Wiyono, S. (2018). Empat Pilar Kehidupan Berbangsa dan Bernegara sebagai Panduan dalam Mewujudkan Masyarakat Adil Makmur Berdasarkan Pancasila. Likhitaprajna 15(1), 37-52.

Weatherbee, D.E. (1985). Indonesia in 1984: Pancasila, Politics, and Power. Asian Survey 25(2), 187-197.

Weber, M. (2009). From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. London: Routledge.

Whimster, S. (Ed.). (2016). Max Weber and the Culture of Anarchy. London: Springer.

Yahya Harahap. (2016.). Hukum Acara Perdata. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Yudi Latif. (2011). Negara Paripurna: Historisitas, Rasionalitas dan Aktualitas Pancasila. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Zainal, A. (2012). Penelitian Pendidikan Metode dan Paradigma Baru. Bandung: Rosdakarya.

Zaman, M. (2017). Book Reviews-Mohammad Hashim Kamali. The Middle Path of Moderation in Islam: The Qur'anic Principle of Wasatiyyah. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. pp. xi+320. Hardcover. ISBN: 978-0-19-022683-1. Islamic Studies 56(1-2), 151-155.