Reform Regulation of Novum in Criminal Judges in an Effort to Provide Legal Certainty

Main Article Content

Rian Saputra
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5827-0287
Muhammad Khalif Ardi
Pujiyono Pujiyono
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5971-2446
Sunny Ummul Firdaus
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0246-8857

Abstract

The research stems from Decision Number 224 PK/PID.SUS/2018 which grants the application for judicial review (hereinafter abbreviated as PK) by a suspected narcotics abuser with a novum (new evidence) in the form of previous judges' decisions. In this case, this study aims to conceptualize how the regulation of PK legal remedies in criminal cases should be. This research is a normative legal research, the approach used is a case approach, a comparative approach, and a conceptual approach, with a literature study research technique. After knowing the arguments for the admissibility of submitting a PK in the form of a District Court Decision, the author makes several comparisons with the Criminal Procedure Code (America and France), and concludes based on this comparison that the use of the basis for submitting a PK should be regulated clearly and firmly in the Criminal Procedure Code, because the two countries in its criminal procedural law it expressly states that the submission of a PK must be based on new facts and evidence which, if presented at the previous trial, has the potential to reduce or even abort the prosecution's charge

Article Details

How to Cite
Saputra, R., Ardi, M. K., Pujiyono, P., & Firdaus, S. U. (2021). Reform Regulation of Novum in Criminal Judges in an Effort to Provide Legal Certainty. JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies), 6(2), 437-482. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v6i2.51371
Section
Research Articles
Author Biographies

Rian Saputra, Universitas Slamet Riyadi

Rian Saputra SH MH is a Lecturer at Faculty of Law Universitas Slamet Riyadi, Solo, Indonesia. He pursuing a Doctoral Program at Univesitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia. Some of his recent publications are such as: Inhibiting Factors Inventorying and Mapping Potential Geographical Indications in Riau Province (International Conference on Environmental and Energy Policy, 2021), Institutionalization of the Approval Principle of Majority Creditors for Bankruptcy Decisions in Bankruptcy Act Reform Efforts (Journal of Morality and Legal Culture, 2020), and Development of Creative Industries as Regional Leaders in National Tourism Efforts Based on Geographical Indications (BESTUUR, 2020). 

Muhammad Khalif Ardi, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Muhammad Khalif Ardi is a Postgraduate Student, Master of Laws, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta Indonesia

Pujiyono Pujiyono, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Prof. Dr Pujiyono SH MHum  is a Professor of Private Law at Faculty of Law Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesi. Some of his recent publications are such as: Moral Approach in Restorative Justice Implementation on Criminal Act of Molesting (Case Study on the behalf Perpetrator Kasemi binti Kasemo Semito) (International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 2021), Criminal Liability of Holding Company in Environmental Crime in Indonesia (Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 2021), Fintech Remittance Syariah: The Solution of Collection Ziswaf Overseas (Brawijaya Law Journal, 2021), and Small Claim Court as the Alternative of Bad Credit Settlement for Legal Certainty of the Economic Actors (Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services, 2021).

Sunny Ummul Firdaus, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Dr Sunny Ummul Firdaus SH MH is a Lecturer a Faculty of Law Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta. Some of his recent publications are such as: Urgensi Penyelenggaraan Pusat Studi Demokrasi Dan Ketahanan Nasional Di Lingkungan Universitas (Jurnal Ilmiah Dunia Hukum, 2022), Solar-Based Electric Vehicle Charging: Analysis of Conception and Regulation in Indonesia (International Conference For Democracy and National Resilience, 2021), Inhibiting Factors Inventorying and Mapping Potential Geographical Indications in Riau Province (International Conference on Environmental and Energy Policy, 2021), and A Policy Design On Narcotics For The Prevention Of The Use Of Narcotics And Its Bad Impacts Reduction Due To Narcotics Abuse (European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 2021)

References

Adji, O. S. (1981). Herziening, Ganti Rugi, Suap, Perkembangan Delik. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Adonara, F. F. (2016). Prinsip Kebebasan Hakim Dalam Memutus Perkara Sebagai Amanat Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 12(2), 217-236. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1222

Arief, D. M., & Gultom, E. (2013) Urgensi Perlindungan Korban Kejahatan. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Ariyanto, D. (2021). Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Sebagai Novum Pengajuan Peninjauan Kembali Pada Tindak Pidana Narkotika. Thesis. Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Asnawi, M. N. (2014) Hermeneutika Putusan Hakim. Yogyakarta: UII Press.

Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional. (1992) Peningkatan Yurisprudensi Sebagai Sumber Hukum, Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional.

Fitriana, M. K. (2018). Peranan Politik Hukum dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia sebagai Sarana Mewujudkan Tujuan Negara (Laws and Regulations In Indonesia As The Means Of Realizing The Country’S Goal). Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v12i2.403

Gafar, Y. (2012). Penanggulangan Peredaran Narkotika di Wilayah Perbatasan Kalimantan Barat (Indonesia)-Sarawak (Malaysia) (Studi Terhadap Peranan Badan Narkotika Nasional). Jurnal Nestor Magister Hukum, 2(2). https://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/nestor/article/view/1035

Garner, B. A. (ed.) (1999) Black’s Law Dictionary, 7th ed. United States of America: West Group.

Harahap, M. Y. (2001). Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP: Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi dan Peninjauan Kembali. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Hermanto, A. B. (2016). Ajaran Positivisme Hukum Di Indonesia: Kritik Dan Alternatif Solusinya. Jurnal Hukum dan Bisnis (Selisik), 2(2), 108-121. https://doi.org/10.35814/selisik.v2i2.650

Hoesein, Z. A. (2012). Pembentukan Hukum dalam Perspektif Pembaruan Hukum. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 1(3), 307-327. http://dx.doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v1i3.87

Indonesia. (1981). Supreme Court Decision Number 6PK/Kr/1980 Dated January 24, 1981.

Indonesia. (1997). Supreme Court Decision Number 14/PK/Pid/1997 dated November 14, 1997.

Indonesia. (2005). Supreme Court Decision Number 71/PK/Pid/2005 Dated 28 December 2005.

Indonesia. (2008). Supreme Court Decision Number 109/PK/Pid/2007 dated January 25, 2008.

Indonesia. (2017a). Decision on Case Number 125/Pid.Sus/2017/PN.Skt

Indonesia. (2017b). Decision on Case Number 454/Pid.Sus/2017/PN.SKt.

Indonesia. (2018a). Decision on Case Number: 244 PK/Pid.Sus/2018.

Indonesia. (2018b) Decision on Case Number 10/Pid.Sus/2018/PN.Skt.

Junef, M. (2017). Forum MAHKUMJAKPOL-BNN-MENKES-MENSOS dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Narkotika. Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, 11(3), 305-336. http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2017.V11.305-336

Kahn-Freund; L., & Rudden, R. (1991) A Source-Book on French Law, 3rd ed..New York: Oxford University Press.

Lubis, S. K. (2002). Etika Profesi Hakim. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika

Muladi, M. (1995) Kapita Selekta Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Prodjohamidjojo, M. (1982). Pembahasan Hukum Acara Pidana Dalam Teori dan Praktek. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita

Rasjidi, L. (2009) Dinamika Situasi Kondisi Hukum Dewasa Ini dari Perspektif Teori dan Filosofikal. Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Rening, S. R. (2019). Pembaharuan Politik Hukum Peninjauan Kembali Dalam Perkara Pidana dan Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia di Indonesia, Dissertation. Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum Universitas Padjajaran.

Sabuan, A., et.al., (1990) Hukum Acara Pidana. Bandung: Angkasa.

Sameko, F.X.A. (2011) Keadilan Versus Orosedur Hukum: Kritik terhadap Hukum Modern. Orasi Ilmiah Dalam Rangka Wisuda Sarjana STHM Angkatan XIII, Jakarta.

Saputra, R. (2019). Pergeseran Prinsip Hakim Pasif Ke Aktif Pada Praktek Peradilan Perdata Perspektif Hukum Progresif. Wacana Hukum, 2(1). 10-18. https://doi.org/10.33061/1.jwh.2019.25.1.2750

Saputra, R. (2020). Development of Creative Industries as Regional Leaders in National Tourism Efforts Based on Geographical Indications. BESTUUR, 8(2), 108-120. https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v8i2.43139

Saputra, R., & Luthviati, R. D. (2020). Institutionalization of the Approval Principle of Majority Creditors for Bankruptcy Decisions in Bankruptcy Act Reform Efforts. Journal of Morality and Legal Culture, 1(2), 104-112. https://doi.org/10.20961/jmail.v1i2.46880

Sidabutar, M. (1999). Hak Terdakwa, Terpidana, Penuntut Umum, Menempuh Upaya Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers

Soedirjo, S. (1986). Peninjauan Kembali dalam Perkara Pidana: Arti dan Makna. Jakarta: Akademika Pressindo.

Sudarsono, S. (1999). Kamus Hukum. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Sujono, A. R., & Daniel, D. B. (2013) Komentar dan Pembahasan Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Tahir, H. D. (1982) Bab Tentang Herziening di dalam Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Acara Pidana. Bandung: Alumni.

Tambir, I. M. (2019) Pendekatan Restorative Justice dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana di Tingkat Penyidikan. JMHU (Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana), 8(4), 549-574. https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2019.v08.i04.p09

Wicaksana, Y. P. (2018). Implementasi asas ius curia novit dalam penafsiran hukum putusan hakim tentang keabsahan penetapan tersangka. Lex Renaissance, 3(1), 86-108. ttps://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol3.iss1.art3