Analysis of Constitutional Court Decision Number 46/PUU-XIV/2016 Related to LGBT and Community Attitude
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The Constitutional Court in Decision Number 46 / PUU-XIV / 2016 had pros and cons in the community. One of the materials that became the pros and cons of the decision was regarding the existence of LGBT. This study discusses the Constitutional Court's Decision Number 46 / PUU-XIV / 2016, especially concerning LGBT. There are two important topics contained in this study, namely (1) normative juridical analysis of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 46 / PUU-XIV / 2016 related to LGBT and (2) community attitudes towards LGBT after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 46 / PUU-XIV / 2016 This study concludes that Constitutional Court Decision Number 46 / PUU-XIV / 2016 is legally normative and does not conflict with statutory regulations. Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 46 / PUU-XIV / 2016 actually refers to the laws and regulations that govern the provisions of the ruling for the Constitutional Court. The attitude of the community related to LGBT after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 46 / PUU-XIV / 2016 was in fact influenced by various factors
Article Details
All writings published in this journal are personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Author(s) retain copyrights under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
References
Arifin, R., Waspiah, W., & Latifiani, D. (2018). Penulisan Karya Ilmiah untuk Mahasiswa Hukum. Semarang: BPFH UNNES.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2005). Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press.
BBC News Indonesia. (2018). Marak perda anti-LGBT 'demi moral publik', bagaimana nalar hukumnya?. accessed from https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/indonesia-46170154
Dewi, M. B. K., & Arifin, R. (2019). Emancipation and Legal Justice; Portrait of Women's Legal Protection In Indonesia. Jurnal Cita Hukum, 7(1), 101-114.
Izzah, U.K. (2012). Studi Tentang Sikap dan Perilaku Masyarakat (Pasien) Pada Masa Keberlakuan Kebijakan Jaminan Persalinan di RSUD Kabupaten Jombang 2012. Jejaring Administrasi Publik, 2(8), 104-117.
Ibrahim, J. (2009). Teori Dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.
Juliana, R., & Arifin, R. (2019). Anak dan Kejahatan (Faktor Penyebab dan Perlindungan Hukum). Jurnal Selat, 6(2), 225-234.
Martitah, M. (2016). Mahkamah Konstitusi: Dari Negative Legislature ke Positive Legislature?. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press.
Pakpahan, D.R. (2017). Pengaruh Pengetahuan dan Sikap Terhadap Perilaku Masyarakat Pada Bank Syariah Di Wilayah Kelurahan Sei Sikambing D. At-Tawassuth, 3(3), 345-367.
Putri, K. D. A., & Arifin, R. (2018). Tinjauan Teoritis Keadilan dan Kepastian dalam Hukum di Indonesia (The Theoretical Review of Justice and Legal Certainty in Indonesia). MIMBAR YUSTITIA, 2(2), 142-158.
Pratiwi, P.S. (2018). Survei: Mayoritas Warga Terancam LGBT. accessed from https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20180125122036-20-271486/survei-mayoritas-warga-terancam-lgbt
Rahadian, L. (2017). MUI Pertanyakan Putusan MK yang Tolak Kriminalisasi LGBT. accessed from https://tirto.id/mui-pertanyakan-putusan-mk-yang-tolak-kriminalisasi-lgbt-cBMh
Sabandar, S. (2017). Komentar Menteri Agama Terkait Putusan MK soal LGBT. accessed from https://www.liputan6.com/news/read/3199702/komentar-menteri-agama-terkait-putusan-mk-soal-lgbt
Sihombing, E.NAM. (2019). Perilaku LGBT dalam Perspektif Konstitusi Negara Republik Indonesia dan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/PUUXIV/2016. Jurnal EduTech, 5(3), 13-20.
Soekanto, S. (1983). Beberapa Permasalahan Hukum dalam Kerangka Pembangunan di Indonesia. Jakarta: UI Press.