Atiningsih, S.M. 2018. Penerapan Model Problem Based Learning untuk Meningkatkan Tanggung Jawab dan Kemampuan Koneksi Matematika Peserta Didik Kelas XI. Journal of Medives,2(1):77-86.
Creswell, J. W. 2014. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches: fourth edition. Sage publications, Inc.
Depdiknas. 2006. Permendiknas No 22 Tahun 2006 Tentang Standar Isi. Jakarta : Depdiknas.
Dwiyanto, F., Setyosari, P., Wahjoedi, Dwiyogo, W.D. 2017. Effects of Problem Based Learning Strategy and Achievement Motivation on the Student’s Critical Thinking Abilities. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 6(6): 707-713
Hodiyanto, H. 2017. Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Problem Solving terhadap Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Ditinjau dari Gender. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2):219-228.
Munawar, H.A., Wuryanto, Asikin, M. 2013. Keefektifan Pendekatan Appitude Treatment Interaction terhadap Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Peserta Didik. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education,2(1):96-104.
NCTM. 2000. Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. United States of America : The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc
Nurdiana,H., Emi P., Sugiman. 2018. Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Ditinjau dari Self-Efficacy menggunakan Model Discovery Learning Terintegrasi Pemberian Motivasi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika.
Peranginangin, S.A., Saragih, S., & Siagian, P. 2019. Development of Learning Materials through PBL with Karo Culture Context to improve Students’ Problem Solving Ability and Self-Efficacy. International Electronic Journal Of Mathematics Education, 14(2):265-274.
Perwitasari, D., & Surya, E. 2017. The Development of Learning Material Using Problem Based Learning to Improve Mathematical Communication Ability of Secondary School Students. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 33(2):200-207.
Purnomo, D.J., Asikin, M., & Junaedi, I. 2015. Tingkat Berpikir Kreatif pada Geometri Siswa Kelas VII Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif dalam Setting Problem Based Learning. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(2):109-115.
Qohar, A. & Sumarmo, U. 2013. Improving Mathematical Communicaton Ability and Self-Regulation Learning Of Junior High Students by Using Reciprocal Teaching. IndoMS-JME Journal, 4(1):59-74.
Rafli, M.F., Syahputra, E., & Yusnadi. 2018. Influence Of Problem Based Learng Model and Early Mathematics Ability to Mathematical Communication Skills and Self-Confidence in Junior High School. American Journal of Educational Research, 6(11):1539-1545
Ramdani, Y. 2012. Pengembangan Instrumen dan Bahan Ajar untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Komunikasi, Penalaran, dan Koneksi Matematis dalam Konsep Integral. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, Vol 13 (1)
Rusmono. 2012. Strategi Pembelajaran dengan Problem Based Learning Itu Perlu. Bogor: Penerbit Ghalia Indonesia
Setyaningrum, W. & Waryanto, N. H. 2017. Developing Mathematics Edutainment Media for Android based on Students’ Understanding and Interest: A Teachers’ Review. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics Series 983, doi :10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012093
Setyaningsih, T.D., Agoestanto, A., & Kurniasih, A.W. 2014. Identifikasi Tahap Berpikir Kritis Siswa Menggunakan PBL dalam Tugas Pengajuan Masalah Matematika. Jurnal Kreano,5(2):180-187.
Suprihatiningrum, J. 2013. Strategi Pembelajaran: Teori dan Aplikasi. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media
Susilo,B.E. & Kharisudin, I. 2010. Improving The Autodidact Learning of Student On Kalkulus Through Cooperative Learning “Student Teams Achievement Division” By Portofolio Programmed. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 27(1):78-83.
Taufiq, M., Amalia, A. V., Parmin, & Leviana, A. 2016. Design of Science Mobile Learning of Eclipse Phenomena With Conservation Insight Android-Based APP INVENTOR 2. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5 (2):291-298.
Umar, W. 2012. Membangun Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Infinity, 1(1).
Wardani, S., Lindawati, L., & Kusuma, S. B. W. 2017.The Development of Inquiry By Using Android-System-Based Chemistry Board Game to Improve Learning Outcome and Critical Thinking Ability. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(2):196-205.
Widyaningrum, D., Mariani, S., & Sutikno. 2015.”Analysis of Student’s Confidence and Mathematical Communication in Reciprocal Teaching with Media ‘Wayang’”. Proceeding. International Conference on Mathematics, Science, and Education 2015 at Semarang State University. Semarang, 5-6 September 2015.
Zimmerman, B.J. 2000. Self-Efficacy: An Essential Motive to Learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology 25, 82-91.
Zulfah, Fauzan, A., & Armiati. 2018. Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik Berbasis Problem Based Learning untuk Materi Matematika Kelas VII. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(2): 33-46.
- Abstract viewed - 560 times
- PDF downloaded - 524 times
Copyright
© Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 2020
Affiliations
Muhammad Ashim
Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Mohammad Asikin
Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Iqbal Kharisudin
Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
How to Cite
Mathematics Communication Based on Students’ Self – Efficacy in Problem Based Learning Assisted By Mobile Learning
Vol 9 No 2 (2020): December 2020
Submitted: Sep 18, 2019
Published: Dec 23, 2020
Abstract
This research aims to describe mathematics communication skill based on self-efficacy of students in problem based learning assisted by mobile learning. This research was a concurrent embedded. The population was X grade students of MAN 1 Kota Pekalongan. The technique of sampling was purposive sampling. It was selected X MIA 2 as experimental group. The subjects were grouped based on self-efficacy with high, moderate, and low categories to be interviewed about their mathematics communication skill. The instruments were test and interview. The findings showed that PBL assisted by mobile leanring was qualified. The result of mathematics communication description based on self-efficacy was varied, it was shown from 8 students with high self-efficacy, there were 5 students categorized high, 2 categorized moderate, and 1 categorized low. From 20 students with moderate self-efficacy, there were 5 students categorized high, 11 categorized moderate, and 4 categorized low. From 8 students with low self-efficacy, there was only 1 students categorized high, 2 categorized moderate, and 5 categorized low.