Defaults in Credit Agreements: How Are They Settled? Contract Law, Tort Law

Main Article Content

Rizky Auliandi
Mangatur Hadiputera Simanjuntak

Abstract

This study aims to determine whether the debtor has carried out his achievements as they should and knows the legal consequences for the debtor when trying to carry out his achievements more than the specified due date. This research is a normative or doctrinal research that is descriptive in nature using secondary data types. In this research, the data collection technique used is the study of literature. The results showed that Sujono, as the debtor and PT BPR Mranggen Mitra Persada as the creditor had carried out the credit agreement. By fulfilling the legal conditions of the agreement as stipulated in Article 1320 of the Civil Code, both subjective and objective terms, the agreement credit between PT BPR Mranggen Mitra Persada as the creditor and Sujono as the debtor is a legal agreement, but in credit repayments Sujono has an arrears of credit repayments calculated from the principal debt, interest, and costs incurred due to arrears. Since PT BPR Mranggen Mitra Persada filed a lawsuit with the Blora District Court, Sujono as a defendant had no good intention to attend the trial. The Panel of Judges decided to drop the verdict without the presence of the defendant called verstek. From this decision the defendant or Sujono fought against verstek or what was called the verzet. With respect to the verzet submitted by Sujono, the judge considered that the resistance was rejected by the Panel of Judges based on the consideration that Sujono had wrongly determined his legal subject and incorrectly determined the arguments of the resistance proposed by Sujono against PT BPR Mranggen Mitra Persada. Based on the decision of the Panel of Judges, Sujono is still considered to have defaulted and must fulfil his achievements.

Article Details

How to Cite
Auliandi, R., & Simanjuntak, M. H. (2020). Defaults in Credit Agreements: How Are They Settled?. Unnes Law Journal, 6(1), 143-162. https://doi.org/10.15294/ulj.v5i2.23514
Section
Research Article

References

Aqmarina, R. (2018). Konsep Wanprestasi Terhadap Kredit Bermasalah Pada Perjanjian Kredit Bank. Thesis. Surabaya: Universitas Airlangga.

Busro, A. (2011). Hukum Perikatan Berdasar Buku III KUH Perdata. Yogyakarta: Pohon Cahaya.

Czechowska, I. D. (2018). The essence of the Bank Guarantee Fund’s activity and related dilemmas in the context of banking system stability. Annales. Etyka W Życiu Gospodarczym, 21(5), 121-130.

Djumhana, M. (2000). Hukum Perbankan di Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Erwin, K., & Muda, I. (2018). The Relationship of Lending, Funding, Capital, Human Resource, Asset Liability Management to Non-Financial Sustainability of Rural Banks (BPRs) in Indonesia. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences 13(2), 520-542.

Gazali, D. S., & Usman, R. (2010). Hukum Perbankan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Harsono, B. (1999). Hukum Agraria Indonesia Sejarah Pembentukan Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria Isi dan Pelaksanaannya. Jakarta: Djambatan.

Hermansyah, H. (2006). Hukum Perbankan Nasional Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana.

Kasmir, K. (2002). Dasar-Dasar Perbankan. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo.

Kuncoro, A. C., Poesoko, P., Susanti, D. O., & Harianto, A. (2019). Characteristics of Power of Attorney for Mortgage Rights on Collateral Law System in Indonesia. Journal of Law, Policy & Globalization 87(1), 192-206.

Marzuki, P. M., In Zainuddin Ali. (2013). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Muhammad, R. N. P. (2019). Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan Karena Wanprestasi Terhadap Perjanjian Kredit Bank. Lex et Societatis 6(10), 14-20.

Naja, H. R. D. (2005). Hukum Kredit dan Bank Garansi. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Nolan-Haley, J. M. (1991). Alternative Dispute Resolution. Minnesota: West Publishing Company.

Park, K. A. (2017). Reverse Mortgage Collateral: Undermaintenance or Overappraisal?. Cityscape, 19(1), 7-28.

Patrik, P. (1994). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Perikatan. Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Patrik, P., & Kashadi, K. (2009). Hukum Jaminan. Semarang: UNDIP.

Pranatha, I. M. A. D., Purwanti, P., & Dharmakusuma, A. G. A. (2017). Penyelesaian Wanprestasi Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Bank Pada Pt. Bank Negara Indonesia (BNI) Kantor Cabang Unit (KCU) Singaraja. Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 5(2), 1-5.

Putriyanti, E. D. (2017). Legal Status of Credit Bank Guarantee in Indonesia’s Legal Guarantee. Sriwijaya Law Review, 1(2), 128-141.

Rahayu, I. D. C. (2017). Penyelesaian Wanprestasi Perjanjian Kredit dengan Jaminan Hak Tanggungan oleh Debitur Dihubungkan dengan Pasal 1320 KUH Perdata dan UU No 4 Tahun 1996 Tentang UU Hak Tanggungan (Studi Kasus di Bank Perkreditan Rakyat Magga Jaya Utama Taman Cibodas Kota Tangerang). Dissertation. Pamulang: Universitas Pamulang.

Soekanto, S., In Zainuddin Ali. (2013). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2006). Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Subekti, R. (1992). Aspek-Aspek Hukum Perikatan Nasional. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Sutedi, A. (2010). Hukum dan Hak Tanggungan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

van Peter, L. (Ed.). (2016). Sociale (on) zekerheid: de voorziene toekomst. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

Wicaksono, F. S. (2008). Panduan Lengkap Membuat Surat Surat Kontrak. Jakarta: Visimedia.

Winarta, F. H. (2011). Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa-Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia & Internasional. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika Offset.