Optimization of Humanist Law Enforcement in Order to Realize the Paradigm of Civilian Police

Main Article Content

Setiadi Setiadi


The world's development today requires the Indonesian National Police (INP), must be able to adapted the community's needs and demands. Indonesian Council Decree Number VI / MPR-RI / 2000 arrange the INP as a civilian institution and separate from the Indonesian military, thus requiring INP to change the identity to become a security officer with a civilian character. Building the organizational paradigm of INP to become civilian and democratic police is very necessary, so the role and function of INP as a protector and public servant can be achieved. Humanist law enforcement without using violents will build INP faces became more calm and  protective. How is the humanist law enforcement towards the realization of the civilian police paradigm? Humanist law enforcement by the Cilacap Police has not been optimal, it can be seen in the regulations regarding humanist law enforcement within the Police organization that have not been realized, the competence of police officers is not yet optimal in the knowledge, attitudes, and practices, regarding the humanist and the Civil Police paradigm, infrastructure has not been fully supported, community law awareness is still low, and legal culture has not yet been implemented in society. This is influenced by developments in the strategic environment as well as internal and external factors. The SWOT analysis followed by the Anallytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to produces IFAS, EFAS, and SFAS to determine the action plan of the strategy. The implementation of short-, medium- and long-term strategies obtained from AHP calculations is expected to realize the expected ideal conditions. The implementation of programs in the strategy that has been set is expected to optimize humanism law enforcement to realize the Civilian Police paradigm.

Article Details

How to Cite
Setiadi, S. (2023). Optimization of Humanist Law Enforcement in Order to Realize the Paradigm of Civilian Police. Unnes Law Journal, 9(1), 66-128. https://doi.org/10.15294/ulj.v9i1.66846
Research Article


Peraturan dan Perundang-Undangan

Republik Indonesia. 2002. Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 tentang Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia. Lembaran Negara RI Tahun 2002, Nomor 2 Sekretariat Negara. Jakarta.

Republik Indonesia. 2019. Peraturan Kepala Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 6 Tahun 2019 tentang Manajemen Penyidikan Tindak Pidana. Berita Negara RI Tahun 2019, Nomor Menkumham RI. Jakarta.

Republik Indonesia. 2015. Peraturan Kepala Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 3 Tahun 2015 tentang Pemolisian Masyarakat. Berita Negara RI Tahun 2015, Nomor Menkumham RI. Jakarta.

Polres Cilacap. 2019. Laporan Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (LKIP) Kepolisian Resort Cilacap tahun 2019.

Polres Cilacap. 2020. Laporan Kesatuan Kepolisian Resort Cilacap tahun 2020.


Asshidiqie, Jimly. (2006). Teori Hanls Kelsen tentang Hukum. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press.

Buhler, Charlotte. (1980). Practice Kinder Psychologie. Boston: Hougton Miffin. Co.

Covey, Steven R. (2010). The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People (7 Kebiasaaan Manusia yang sangat Efektif). Tangerang: Binarupa Aksara Publisher.

Chaplin, J, P. (2008). Kamus Lengkap Psikologi. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada

Depdikbud (2003). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Dunnette, Marvin D. (1976). Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally Collage Pub. Co.

Friedman, Lawrence, M. (1975). The Legal System. A Social Science Perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Hess, Karen M dan Christine Hess Orthman. (2008). Introduction to Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice.

Heuken, Adolf S.J. (1979). Tantangan Membina Kepribadian: Pedoman Mengenal Diri. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Lasswell, Harold D. (2009). Structure an Function of Communication in Society. Wilbur Schramm.

Metrokusumo, Sudikno. (2002). Mengenal Hukum Suatu Pengantar. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Moenir, A. S (1992). Manajemen Pelayanan Umum di Indonesia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Nelken, David (2004). Using the Concept of Legal Culture. Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy.

Notoatmojo, Soekidjo. (2003). Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Reksodiputro, Mardjono. (1993). Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. (Melihat kepada Kejahatan dan Penegakan Hukum dalam Batas-Batas Toleransi). Jakarta: FH Universitas Indonesia.

Riyanto, Setyo. (2018). Pengambuilan Keputusan Strategis Berbasis EFAS/IFAS/SFAS dan AHP. Bandung: Paramedia Komunikatama.

Soekanto, Soerjono. (1982). Kesadaran Hukum dan Kepatuhan Hukum. Edisi Pertama. Jakarta: Rajawali.

_________________. (2004). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Zanden, james w. Vander. (1990). The Social Experience: An Introduction to Sociology. New York: McGraw-Hill.