Penal Policy on Assets Recovery on Corruption Cases in Indonesia
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Corruption is an extraordinary crime whose impact on actions can undermine a country, corruption is increasingly becoming increasingly common. Even though not a few of the former state officials or state officials until all the villages have felt how fierce the law enforcers, especially the KPK arrested them all, either hand-grabbing operations or the development of public reporting, impressed by them all were endless corruptors kept appearing , Law enforcement in this modern era is not only concerned with prosecution and prevention, in this case corruption is regulated by the return of state losses as asset recovery, which in turn will maximize the return of state losses from corruptors. As for the problems of this study are: 1. Why is the politics of criminal law (strafrechtpolitiek) in the framework of restoring state losses not significant with the real state losses due to criminal acts of corruption? 2. How is the politics of criminal law ideally (strafrechtpolitiek) implemented so that the maximum return on state losses due to corruption? The benefits of research consist of theoretical benefits and practical benefits. Theoretical benefits are expected to contribute to theoretical thinking in criminal law, especially concerning the politics of criminal law in the context of eradicating criminal acts of corruption. Practical benefits are expected to be able to provide information scientifically to the public both in general and specifically. This study uses a descriptive legal approach that is supported by primary, secondary and tertiary data obtained from documentation and literature studies then analyzed using qualitative descriptive analysis methods. The results showed that the Politics of Criminal Law in the Framework of Returning State Losses due to Corruption in Indonesia was not maximal, as evidenced by the lack of maximum or no maximum return on state losses for corruption, therefore recommendations on simplifying regulations in terms of early prevention or since In the beginning of corruption cases which caused a lot of damage to the state's financial need, there was a special formulation so that the handling could be maximized to restore state losses in corruption.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All writings published in this journal are personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Author(s) retain copyrights under the licence of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0).
References
Arief, Barda Nawawi. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bhakti, 2002.
Arifin, Ridwan. “Analisis Hukum Internasional dalam Perampasan Aset di Negara Kawasan Asia Tenggara Berdasarkan United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) dan ASEAN Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (AMLAT).†Jurnal Penelitian Hukum, 3(1), 2016: 37-55.
Arifin, Ridwan. “Empowering International Cooperation's Role in The Follow of Assets of Corruption's Result.†Indonesian Journal of International Law 11(3), 2014: 414-422.
Arifin, Ridwan. “Combating Corruption under ASEAN Cooperation: The Emerging Issuesâ€, Political and Security Issues in ASEAN, Proceedings International Conference on ASEAN Studies 2014 (ICONAS). ISBN 978-602-71482-2-2, 2014: 23-36.
Ash-shidiqqi, Ellectrananda Anugerah, and Hindrawan Wibisono. “Corruption and Village: Accountability of Village Fund Management on Preventing Corruption (Problems and Challenges)â€. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 3(02), 2018: 195-212.
Ayudo, B. P. Pembayaran Uang Pengganti pada Kasus Pidana. Surabaya: Magister Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga, 2012.
Bentham, Jeremy. Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1960.
BPPB. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa (BPPB), Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia, 2016.
Camphell, Henry et. al.. Black’s Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition. St. Paulminn: West Publishing c.o., 1979.
Friedman, Lawrence M. Sistem Hukum: Perspektif Ilmu Sosial (The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective). Bandung: Nusa Media, 2009.
Garuda Nusantara, Abdul Hakim. Politik Hukum Nasional. Jakarta: Karya Latihan Bantuan Hukum, 1985.
Hamzah, Andi & Dahlan, Irdan. Pemberantasan Korupsi Melalui Hukum Pidana Nasional dan Internasional. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2007.
Hartanti, Evi. Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2008.
Hartono, C. Sunaryati. Politik Hukum Menuju Satu Sistem Hukum Nasional. Bandung: Alumni, 1991.
Hatta, Mohammad. Kebijakan Politik Kriminal Penegakan Hukum dalam Rangka Penanggulangan Kejahatan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2010.
Ibrahim, Risnaldi, Yusoff, Mohammad Agus, and Koling, Huma Magridoni. “Patterns and Causes of Corruption Among Government Officials in Indonesia.†Adabi: Journal of Public Administration and Business 1(1), 2018: 74-91.
Januar, I. “Demokrasi Biang Korupsiâ€, Media Politik dan Dakwah al-Wa’ie (151) March, 2013: 1-31.
Kansil, C.S.T. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 1992.
Marpaung, Leden. Asas-Teori-Praktik Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2005.
Machmudin, Dudu Duswara. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum: Sebuah Sketsa. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2001.
Makawimbang, Hernold Ferry. Kerugian Keuangan Negara dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Suatu Pendekatan Hukum Progresif. Yogyakarta: Thafa Media, 2014.
Mardani. Bunga Rampai Hukum Aktual. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia, 2009.
Mas’ud, Jubran. Al-Raid: Mu'jam Lughawiyyun 'Ashriyyun. Beirut: Dar al-‘Ilm al-Malayin, 1992.
Muchsin. Sebuah Ikhtisar Piagam Madinah, Filsafat Timur, Filosof Islam dan Pemikirannya. Jakarta: STIH IBLAM, 2004. O
Mujiran, Paulus. Republik Para Maling. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2004.
Muladi dan Barda Nawawi Arief. Teori-Teori dan Kebijakan Pidana. Bandung: PT Alumni, 2010.
Muladi. Kapita Selekta Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Semarang: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro, 1995.
Naning, Ramdlon. Cita dan Citra Hak-Hak Asasi Manusia di Indonesia. Jakarta: Lembaga Kriminologi Universitas Indonesia Program Penunjang Bantuan Hukum Indonesia, 1983.
Nashriana. “Asset Recovery dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Upaya Pengembalian Kerugian Negaraâ€. Jurnal Kajian Syariah 10(2), 2010: 1-36.
Nawawi Arief, Barda. Bungai Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Kencana, 2011.
Nawawi Arief, Barda. Masalah Penegakan Hukum dan Kebijakan Penanggulangan Kejahatan. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2001.
Ohoitimur, Yong. Teori Etika tentang Hukuman Legal. Jakarta: Gramedia, 1997.
Prayudi, Guse. Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dipandang dalam Berbagai Aspek. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pena, 2010.
Prayudi, Guse. “Sifat Melawan Hukum Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsiâ€, Majalah Varia Peradilan, Tahun XXII, No. 254, January 2007, IKAHI, Jakarta.
Putra, I Made Raka Dwi. “Filsafat Hukumâ€, Online Article Academia Edu, 2016.
Radhie, Teuku Mohammad. “Pembaharuan dan Politik Hukum dalam Rangka Pembangunan Nasionalâ€, Majalah Prisma No. 6(II) December 1973.
Rahardjo, Satjipto. Hukum dan Perubahan Sosial: Suatu Tinjauan Teoritis dan Pengalaman-pengalaman di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2009.
Rahardjo, Satjipto. Beberapa Pemikiran tentang Ancangan Antardisiplin dalam Pembinaan Hukum Nasional. Bandung: Sinar Baru, 1985.
Rahardjo, Satjipto. Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1991.
Rahardjo, Satjipto. Mengajarkan Keteraturan Menemukan Ketidakaturan (Teaching Order Finding Disorder). Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro, 2000.
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. London: Oxford University Press, 2009.
Is Sadi, Muhammad. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2017.
Schmandt, Henry J., et.al. Filsafat Politik-Kajian Historis dari Zaman Yunani Kuno-Modern. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2005.
Sidharta, Bernard Arif. Refleksi tentang Struktur Ilmu Hukum: Sebuah Penelitian tentang Fondasi Kefilsafatan dan Sifat Keilmuan Ilmu Hukum Sebagai Landasan Pengembangan Ilmu Hukum Nasional Indonesia. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 1999.
Soedarto. Perkembangan Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Hukum. Bandung: Sinar Baru, 1979.
Soedarto. Hukum dan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Alumni, 1986.
Soehino. Sejarah Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 1984.
Sudarto. Hukum dan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Alumni, 2007.
Sudarto. Hukum dan Perkembangan Masyarakat. Jakarta: Sinar Baru, 2007.
Sudarsono. Kamus Hukum. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta, 2007.
Sulistia, Teguh & Zurnetti, Aria. Hukum Pidana Horizon Baru Pasca Reformasi. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2012.
Syamsuddin, M. Budaya Hukum Hakim Berbasis Hukum Progresif. Jakarta: Kencana, 2012.
Thalib, Sayuti. Politik Hukum Baru: Mengenai Kedudukan dan Peranan Hukum Adat dan Hukum Islam Nasional. Bandung: Binacipta, 1987.
Wahjono, Padmo. Indonesia Negara Berdasarkan atas Hukum. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1986.
Walker, Nigel. Sentencing in a Rational Society. New York: Basic Books, Inc, Publishers, 1969.
Wehr, Hans. A Dictionary of Modern Written Arabic. London: Mac-Donald & Evan Ltd., 1980.
Wibowo, Muhtar Hadi. “Corporate Responsibility in Money Laundering Crime (Perspective Criminal Law Policy in Crime of Corruption in Indonesia)â€. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 3(02), 2018: 213-36.
Wignjosoebroto, Seotandyo. Dari Hukum Kolonial ke Hukum Nasional: Dinamika Sosial Politik dalam Perkembangan Hukum di Indonesia. Jakarta: HUMA, 2014.