Simple Patent Protection: A Case of Sarung Tenun Goyor Indonesia and The Comparison to Malaysia Utility Innovation Protection
Article Sidebar
Published
Jun 1, 2022
Main Article Content
Abstract
The work or products of SMEs are important for the protection of intellectual property rights. The Sarung Tenun Goyor in its production process has gone through long ideas and experiments to produce a distinctive motif and shape, but it becomes a problem whether a traditional work can be subjected to simple patent protection and instead ignores social values and the value of community justice. In addition, Malaysia also has certain protection for utility innovalition that close to simple patent protection in Indonesia. This study is intended to analyze the simple patent protection in the case of Sarung Tenun Goyor Indonesia and Malaysia Utility Innovation Protectopn. This study showed that to fulfill the novelty element, development of the existing production process could be carried out while still paying attention to the values of justice, social, and propriety. The fulfillment of Access Benefit Sharing stipulated in Law Number 13 of 2016 concerning Patents provides legal certainty of simple patent protection derived from traditional knowledge. Whereas the production process of the Sarung Tenun Goyor can be said to be a form of intellectual property and fulfills the elements as a simple patent object. The conclusion of this research is that the production process of the Sarung Tenun Goyor has not received legal protection. The Patent Law provides legal certainty for the development of the sarung tenun goyor production process by fulfilling Access Benefit Sharing (ABS).
Article Details
How to Cite
Rohmat, R., Waspiah, W., & Wei, D. C. C. (2022). Simple Patent Protection: A Case of Sarung Tenun Goyor Indonesia and The Comparison to Malaysia Utility Innovation Protection. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 7(1), 299-338. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v7i1.55439
Issue
Section
Research Articles
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All writings published in this journal are personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Author(s) retain copyrights under the licence of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0).
References
Abdulkadir, Muhammad. Kajian Hukum Ekonomi Hak Kekayaan Intelektual. (Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2007).
Anderson, Jane, E. “Indigenous Knowledge and Intellectual Property Rights.” International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences 2 (2015): 769–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.64078-3.
Ardiniken, Frisca Ajengtirani, Titien Woro Murtini, and Siti Rukayah. “Pola Tata Ruang Kampung Industri Rumah Tangga Studi Kasus: Sentra Tenun ATBM Desa Wanarejan Utara Dan Desa Troso Jepara.” Tesa Arsitektur 14, No. 1 (2016): 42–54. https://doi.org/10.24167/tesa.v14i1.639.
Arrozi, S. E. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Paten Sederhana di Indonesia.” Jurnal Unram 2, No. 1 (2018): 227–249.
Chudasama, Dhaval, and Smit Patel. “Importance of Intellectual Property Rights.” Journal of Intellectual Property (IP) Rights Law 4, No. 2 (2021).
Darusman, Y. M. “Kedudukan Serta Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemegang Hak Paten dalam Kerangka Hukum Nasional Indonesia dan Hukum Internasional.” Yustisia Jurnal Hukum 5, No. 1 (2016): 203–215. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v5i1.8732.
Republic of Indonesia. Directorate General of Intellectual Property, Ministry of Law and Human Rights. “Intellectual Property Database,” 2021. Retrieved from.
Djaja, Ermansyah. Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual. (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2009).
Dutfield, G. “Collective Invention And Patent Law Individualism: Origins And Functions Of The Inventor’s Right Of Attribution.” The WIPO Journal 5, No. 1 (2013): 25–34. https://tind.wipo.int/record/28740.
Fandaya, Indi, Runtung Sitepu, Keizerina Devi Azwar, and Utari Maharany Barus. “Pertanggungjawaban Pemegang Lisensi Wajib Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2001 Tentang Paten.” USU Law Journal 5, No. 3 (2017): 10–21. https://jurnal.usu.ac.id/index.php/law/article/view/18928.
Government of Malaysia. “Patent Act, 1983,” (Malaysia, 1983).
Hidayah, K. Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual. (Malang: Setara Press, 2017).
Inayah, Inayah. “Kesadaran Hukum Pelaku Usaha Mikro Kecil Menengah (UMKM) dalam Perlindungan Kekayaan Intelektual.” Law and Justice 4, No. 2 (2019): 120–136. https://doi.org/10.23917/laj.v4i2.8942.
Jabalnur, Jabalnur. “Perlindungan Hak Paten Bagi Pengrajin Khas.” Halo Oleo Law Review 1, No. 2 (2017): 278–290. http://dx.doi.org/10.33561/holrev.v1i2.3646.
Khairunnisa, Salsabila. “Patent Legal Protection On Invention (Comparation Study Between Indonesia and Japan).” Jurnal Hukum Novelty 9, No. 2 (2018): 183–191. http://dx.doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v9i2.a11338.
Kurnilasari, Dwi Tiara, Annalisa Yahanan, and Rohani Abdul Rahim. “Protection of Traditional Knowledge: A Perspective on Intellectual Property Law in Indonesia.” Sriwijaya Law Review 2, No. 1 (2018): 110–130. http://dx.doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol2.Iss1.114.pp110-130.
Kwon, Seokbeom, and Alan C. Marco. “Can Antitrust Law Enforcement Spur Innovation? Antitrust Regulation of Patent Consolidation and Its Impact on Follow-on Innovations.” Research Policy 50, No. 9 (2021): 104295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104295.
Lin, Hanxin, and Cheryl Xiaoning Long. “Do Discretion Criteria for Patent Administrative Law Enforcement Encourage Innovation among Firms?” China Economic Quarterly International 1, No. 2 (2021): 160175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceqi.2021.05.001.
M., Prabodh, Chaitanya Prasad K., Ashish S., Suthakaran R., and Abhijit K. “Indonesian Patent System: An Overview.” International Journal of Drug Regulatory Affairs 2, No. 2 (2014): 26–30. https://doi.org/10.22270/ijdra.v2i2.129.
Malikovna, Baimoldina Svetlana. “Concept Of Legal Protection Of Intellectual Property Rights.” Procedia: Social And Behavioral Sciences 176 (2015): 998–1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.570.
Nasir, Rinayah. “Paten dalam Proses Produksi: Tinjauan Hak Yang Melekat Pada Inventor.” Jurnal Hukum Positum 1, No. 1 (2016): 141–149. doi:https://doi.org/10.35706/positum.v1i1.503.
Nasrullah, Nasrullah. “Protection of Patent Rights (Comparative Studies in Japan and Indonesia.” Journal of Private and Commercial Law 3, No. 2 (2019): 66–70. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpcl.v3i2.19744.
Nemlioglu, Ilayda. “A Comparative Analysis of Intellectual Property Rights: A Case of Developed versus Developing Countries.” Procedia Computer Science 158 (2019): 988–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.140.
Purwaningsih, Endang. Seri Hukum Kekayaan Intelektual Hukum Paten. (Jakarta: CV. Mandar Maju, 2015).
Purwaningsih, Endang, Evie Rachmawati, and Nur Ariyanti. “Kebijakan Paten Melalui Penguatan Perlindungan Invensi Teknologi dan Peningkatan Kemampuan Inovasi.” Jurnal Surya Kencana Satu: Dinamika Masalah Hukum dan Keadilan 12, No. 2 (2021): 163–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.32493/jdmhkdmhk.v12i2.15865.
Ramaiah, Angayar Kanni. “Innovation, Intellectual Property Rights and Competition Law in Malaysia.” South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law 14, No. 4 (2017): 60-69.
Republic of Indonesia. Law Number 13 of 2016 Concerning Patents. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Year 2016 Number 176. (Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara, 2016).
Republic of Indonesia. Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 13 of 2017 Concerning Communal Intellectual Property Data, State Gazette of 2017 Number 964. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara, 2017.
Republic of Indonesia. Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 38 of 2018 Jo Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 13 of 2021 Concerning Patent Applications State Gazette of 2021 Number 106. (Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara, 2021).
Ribowo, Mochammad Bambang, and Kholis Raisah. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Paten Sederhana Dalam Sistem Hukum Paten Di Indonesia (Studi Komparasi Dengan Sistem Hukum Paten Negara China).” Notarius 12, No. 1 (2019): 42–60. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v12i1.23761.
Siddiq, Miqdad Abdullah. “Dilema Komersialisasi Pengetahuan Tradisional dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia: Antara Perlindungan dan Pembagian Manfaat.” Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan 48, No. 1 (2018): 164–180. http://dx.doi.org/10.21143/.vol48.no1.1600.
Sulistianingsih, Dewi. Perdebatan Pengetahuan Tradisional dalam Kekayaan Intelektual. (Yogyakarta: Pohon Cahaya, 2016).
Wang, Gangfeng. “Extraction of Principle Knowledge from Process Patents for Manufacturing Process Innovation.” Procedia CIRP Journal 56 (2016): 193–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.10.053.
Waspiah, Waspiah. “Model Percepatan Komersialisasi Paten Sederhana Pada Dunia Industri.” Pandecta Research Law Journal 12, No. 2 (2017): 86–105. https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v12i2.7491.
Waspiah, Waspiah, Rodiyah Rodiyah, Dian Latifiani, and Dede Alvin Setiaji. “Advanced Training of Intellectual Property Documents of Industrial Desaign for Goyor Sarung Craftsman in Pemalang District.” Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services 1, No. 2 (2019): 169–192. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijals.v1i2.33961.
Zuami, Mutia Denti Armala, and Bakti Tresnawati. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pemegang Hak Paten Akibat Dihapusnya Kepemilikan Hak Paten dari Daftar Umum Paten.” Jurnal Juristic 1, No. 1 (2020): 95–106. http://jurnal.untagsmg.ac.id/index.php/JRS/article/view/1486.
Anderson, Jane, E. “Indigenous Knowledge and Intellectual Property Rights.” International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences 2 (2015): 769–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.64078-3.
Ardiniken, Frisca Ajengtirani, Titien Woro Murtini, and Siti Rukayah. “Pola Tata Ruang Kampung Industri Rumah Tangga Studi Kasus: Sentra Tenun ATBM Desa Wanarejan Utara Dan Desa Troso Jepara.” Tesa Arsitektur 14, No. 1 (2016): 42–54. https://doi.org/10.24167/tesa.v14i1.639.
Arrozi, S. E. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Paten Sederhana di Indonesia.” Jurnal Unram 2, No. 1 (2018): 227–249.
Chudasama, Dhaval, and Smit Patel. “Importance of Intellectual Property Rights.” Journal of Intellectual Property (IP) Rights Law 4, No. 2 (2021).
Darusman, Y. M. “Kedudukan Serta Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemegang Hak Paten dalam Kerangka Hukum Nasional Indonesia dan Hukum Internasional.” Yustisia Jurnal Hukum 5, No. 1 (2016): 203–215. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v5i1.8732.
Republic of Indonesia. Directorate General of Intellectual Property, Ministry of Law and Human Rights. “Intellectual Property Database,” 2021. Retrieved from
Djaja, Ermansyah. Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual. (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2009).
Dutfield, G. “Collective Invention And Patent Law Individualism: Origins And Functions Of The Inventor’s Right Of Attribution.” The WIPO Journal 5, No. 1 (2013): 25–34. https://tind.wipo.int/record/28740.
Fandaya, Indi, Runtung Sitepu, Keizerina Devi Azwar, and Utari Maharany Barus. “Pertanggungjawaban Pemegang Lisensi Wajib Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2001 Tentang Paten.” USU Law Journal 5, No. 3 (2017): 10–21. https://jurnal.usu.ac.id/index.php/law/article/view/18928.
Government of Malaysia. “Patent Act, 1983,” (Malaysia, 1983).
Hidayah, K. Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual. (Malang: Setara Press, 2017).
Inayah, Inayah. “Kesadaran Hukum Pelaku Usaha Mikro Kecil Menengah (UMKM) dalam Perlindungan Kekayaan Intelektual.” Law and Justice 4, No. 2 (2019): 120–136. https://doi.org/10.23917/laj.v4i2.8942.
Jabalnur, Jabalnur. “Perlindungan Hak Paten Bagi Pengrajin Khas.” Halo Oleo Law Review 1, No. 2 (2017): 278–290. http://dx.doi.org/10.33561/holrev.v1i2.3646.
Khairunnisa, Salsabila. “Patent Legal Protection On Invention (Comparation Study Between Indonesia and Japan).” Jurnal Hukum Novelty 9, No. 2 (2018): 183–191. http://dx.doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v9i2.a11338.
Kurnilasari, Dwi Tiara, Annalisa Yahanan, and Rohani Abdul Rahim. “Protection of Traditional Knowledge: A Perspective on Intellectual Property Law in Indonesia.” Sriwijaya Law Review 2, No. 1 (2018): 110–130. http://dx.doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol2.Iss1.114.pp110-130.
Kwon, Seokbeom, and Alan C. Marco. “Can Antitrust Law Enforcement Spur Innovation? Antitrust Regulation of Patent Consolidation and Its Impact on Follow-on Innovations.” Research Policy 50, No. 9 (2021): 104295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104295.
Lin, Hanxin, and Cheryl Xiaoning Long. “Do Discretion Criteria for Patent Administrative Law Enforcement Encourage Innovation among Firms?” China Economic Quarterly International 1, No. 2 (2021): 160175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceqi.2021.05.001.
M., Prabodh, Chaitanya Prasad K., Ashish S., Suthakaran R., and Abhijit K. “Indonesian Patent System: An Overview.” International Journal of Drug Regulatory Affairs 2, No. 2 (2014): 26–30. https://doi.org/10.22270/ijdra.v2i2.129.
Malikovna, Baimoldina Svetlana. “Concept Of Legal Protection Of Intellectual Property Rights.” Procedia: Social And Behavioral Sciences 176 (2015): 998–1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.570.
Nasir, Rinayah. “Paten dalam Proses Produksi: Tinjauan Hak Yang Melekat Pada Inventor.” Jurnal Hukum Positum 1, No. 1 (2016): 141–149. doi:https://doi.org/10.35706/positum.v1i1.503.
Nasrullah, Nasrullah. “Protection of Patent Rights (Comparative Studies in Japan and Indonesia.” Journal of Private and Commercial Law 3, No. 2 (2019): 66–70. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpcl.v3i2.19744.
Nemlioglu, Ilayda. “A Comparative Analysis of Intellectual Property Rights: A Case of Developed versus Developing Countries.” Procedia Computer Science 158 (2019): 988–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.140.
Purwaningsih, Endang. Seri Hukum Kekayaan Intelektual Hukum Paten. (Jakarta: CV. Mandar Maju, 2015).
Purwaningsih, Endang, Evie Rachmawati, and Nur Ariyanti. “Kebijakan Paten Melalui Penguatan Perlindungan Invensi Teknologi dan Peningkatan Kemampuan Inovasi.” Jurnal Surya Kencana Satu: Dinamika Masalah Hukum dan Keadilan 12, No. 2 (2021): 163–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.32493/jdmhkdmhk.v12i2.15865.
Ramaiah, Angayar Kanni. “Innovation, Intellectual Property Rights and Competition Law in Malaysia.” South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law 14, No. 4 (2017): 60-69.
Republic of Indonesia. Law Number 13 of 2016 Concerning Patents. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Year 2016 Number 176. (Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara, 2016).
Republic of Indonesia. Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 13 of 2017 Concerning Communal Intellectual Property Data, State Gazette of 2017 Number 964. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara, 2017.
Republic of Indonesia. Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 38 of 2018 Jo Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 13 of 2021 Concerning Patent Applications State Gazette of 2021 Number 106. (Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara, 2021).
Ribowo, Mochammad Bambang, and Kholis Raisah. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Paten Sederhana Dalam Sistem Hukum Paten Di Indonesia (Studi Komparasi Dengan Sistem Hukum Paten Negara China).” Notarius 12, No. 1 (2019): 42–60. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v12i1.23761.
Siddiq, Miqdad Abdullah. “Dilema Komersialisasi Pengetahuan Tradisional dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia: Antara Perlindungan dan Pembagian Manfaat.” Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan 48, No. 1 (2018): 164–180. http://dx.doi.org/10.21143/.vol48.no1.1600.
Sulistianingsih, Dewi. Perdebatan Pengetahuan Tradisional dalam Kekayaan Intelektual. (Yogyakarta: Pohon Cahaya, 2016).
Wang, Gangfeng. “Extraction of Principle Knowledge from Process Patents for Manufacturing Process Innovation.” Procedia CIRP Journal 56 (2016): 193–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.10.053.
Waspiah, Waspiah. “Model Percepatan Komersialisasi Paten Sederhana Pada Dunia Industri.” Pandecta Research Law Journal 12, No. 2 (2017): 86–105. https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v12i2.7491.
Waspiah, Waspiah, Rodiyah Rodiyah, Dian Latifiani, and Dede Alvin Setiaji. “Advanced Training of Intellectual Property Documents of Industrial Desaign for Goyor Sarung Craftsman in Pemalang District.” Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services 1, No. 2 (2019): 169–192. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijals.v1i2.33961.
Zuami, Mutia Denti Armala, and Bakti Tresnawati. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pemegang Hak Paten Akibat Dihapusnya Kepemilikan Hak Paten dari Daftar Umum Paten.” Jurnal Juristic 1, No. 1 (2020): 95–106. http://jurnal.untagsmg.ac.id/index.php/JRS/article/view/1486.