How Are Business Actors Responsible for Consumer Losses in Default Cases? An Analysis of Indonesian Consumer Protection Law

Main Article Content

Mia Maulia Fajriana

Abstract

Consumer protection is an integral part of healthy business activities. Default is one of the parties to the agreement which constitutes negligence to meet the conditions set forth in an agreement. This research aims to find out the form of responsibility of businesses for consumer losses due to default and a form of consumer protection for consumer losses due to default. The method of this research is an empirical legal research method or empirical juridical, which is where this empirical law research discusses how the law can operate in society (ius operatum). The results of the study explained that the Consumer Protection Act No. 8 of 1999 already has provided good protection to consumers. This is evident from its wide material coverage and provides maximum protection for consumers. One of them is by regulating the responsibility of businesses to losses experienced by consumers from the sale or transaction. The conclusion of this study shows that the responsibility of businesses for consumer losses due to default under Law No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection can be done by continuing/canceling the agreement and indemnifying losses incurred as a result of the default. It is in accordance with the positive law that applies in Indonesia namely that a consumer if harmed in consuming goods or services, can sue the party that caused the loss. With the qualification of a default lawsuit or an act against the law. 

Article Details

How to Cite
Fajriana, M. M. (2021). How Are Business Actors Responsible for Consumer Losses in Default Cases? An Analysis of Indonesian Consumer Protection Law. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 2(2), 187-196. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v2i2.46614
Section
Research Article

References

Afrilia, D., & Sulistyaningrum, H. P. (2017). Implementasi Prinsip Strict Liability (Prinsip Tanggung Jawab Mutlak) Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen. Simbur Cahaya, 24(3), 4949-4960.

Ariati, N. K., & Suarbha, I. W. (2016). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Dalam Melakukan Transaksi Online. Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 5(1).

Badrulzaman, M. D. (2011). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata Buku III tentang Hukum Perikatan Dengan Penjelasan. Bandung: Alumni.

Erlinawati, M., & Nugrahaningsih, W. (2017). Implementasi Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen Terhadap Bisnis Online. Serambi Hukum, 11(01), 27-40.

Gerungan, A. E. (2016). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Rahasia Dagang Ditinjau dari Aspek Hukum Perdata dan Pidana di Indonesia oleh: Anastasia E. Gerungan. Jurnal Hukum Unsrat, 22(5).

Hartanto, H. (2017). Perlidungan Hak Konsumen terhadap Pelaku Usaha yang Dinyatakan Pailit. ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata, 2(2), 315-328.

Kilikily, J. S. (2017). Tinjauan Yuridis Upaya Penyelesaian Wanprestasi Perjanjian Jual Beli melalui Internet. Jurnal Gloria Yuris, 5(2).

Kristiyanti, C. T. S. (2011). Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Lestari, A. A. A. (2016). Perjanjian baku dalam jual beli kredit sepeda motor ditinjau dari undang-undang nomor 8 tahun 1999. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal), 5(2), 337-352.

Miru, A. (2007). Hukum Kontrak dan Perancangan Kontrak. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Miru, A., & Yodo, S. (2007). Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Nurmansyah, A., & Sukranatha, A. A. K. (2020). Tanggung Jawab Pelaku Usaha Terhadap Kerugian Konsumen dalam Jual Beli Kendaraan Bermotor (Studi PT. Herointinusa). Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 8(8), 1231-1239.

Pande, N. P. J. (2017). Perlindungan Konsumen Terhadap Produk Kosmetik Impor Yang Tidak Terdaftar Di BBPOM Denpasar. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal), 6(1), 13-22.

Purba, O., & Silalahi, R. (2019). Perlindungan Konsumen Terhadap Wansprestasi Pelaku Usaha. Jurnal Darma Agung, 27(3), 1072-1081.

Riung, C. M. (2015). Tanggung Jawab Pelaku USAha Terhadap Kerugian Konsumen Dalam Transaksi Melalui E-commerce. Lex Privatum, 3(2).

Sidabalok, J. (2006). Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen Di Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bahkti.

Sudjana, S. (2019). Akibat Hukum Wanprestasi dan Tanggung Jawab Para Pihak dalam Transaksi Anjak Piutang. Veritas et Justitia, 5(2), 374-398.

Sukarmi, S. (2007). Cyber Law Kontrak Elektronik dalam Bayang-Bayang Pelaku Usaha. Jakarta: Pustaka Sutra.
Sunggono, B. (2015). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Pres.