PERAN GURU PENJASORKES DALAM MENGATASI KENAKALAN SISWA (STUDI KASUS DI SMA NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN KENDAL) TAHUN 2013
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this study to determine, describe, and analyze the role of teachers in addressing student misbehavior penjasorkes Public High School students in Kendal. This study used qualitative methods, the location of the research conducted in SMA se-Kendal. Research subjects in this study were penjasorkes teacher, principal, BK teachers and students. Data collected by using observation, interviews and documentation. The validity of using triangulation source. Data analysis using descriptive analysis model according to Miles and Huberman. Based on the results of research conducted and has been linked with the theory Suparwoto, et al. It can be concluded that the role of teachers penjasorkes (1) in terms of preventive prevent student misbehavior is good. (2) is good in terms of repression. (3) in terms of curative and rehabilitation are good. The conclusions that can be drawn from this research is the teacher's role in addressing delinquency penjasorkes students in SMA se-Kendal has been running both in terms of preventive, repressive and curative or rehabilitation)
Article Details
Section
Articles
References
Abdulkadir Ateng. 1992. Asas dan Landasan Pendidikan Jasmani. DEPDIKBUD.
Achmad Munib. 2006. Pengantar Ilmu Pendidikan. Semarang:UPT MKK UNNES
Adang Suherman. 1999.Dasar-Dasar Penjas: DEPDIKBUD.
Heru Mugiarso, et al. 2006. Bimbingan dan konseling. Semarang: UPT MKK UNNES
Husdarta dan Yudha M. Saputra. 2000. Perkembangan Peserta Didik.DEPDIKBUD.
Lexy J. Moleong.2010. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remadja Rosdakarya.
Soeparwoto, et al. 2006.Psikologi perkembangan. Semarang: UPT MKK UNNES
Suharsimi Arikunto. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
Syaiful Bahri Djamarah. 2005. Guru dan Anak Didik Dalam Interaksi Edukatif Suatu Pendekatan Teoretis Psikologis. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
Tim Penyusun Pusat Bahasa. 2005. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, Edisi Ketiga. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Totok Sumaryanto. 2010. Metodologi Penelitian 2. Semarang: Universitas Negeri Semarang.
UNNES. 2013. Pedoman Penulisan Skripsi Fakultas Ilmu Keolahragaan. Semarang: UNNES Press
http://adzelgar.wordpress.com/2009/02/02/studi-dokumen-dalam-penelitian-kualitatif/
http://k-fauzi.blogspot.com/2012/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo_6.html
http://marzuki49.blogspot.com/2012/02/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo_23.html
http://www.sarjanaku.com/2013/01/pengertian-peran-definisi-menurut-para.html
Achmad Munib. 2006. Pengantar Ilmu Pendidikan. Semarang:UPT MKK UNNES
Adang Suherman. 1999.Dasar-Dasar Penjas: DEPDIKBUD.
Heru Mugiarso, et al. 2006. Bimbingan dan konseling. Semarang: UPT MKK UNNES
Husdarta dan Yudha M. Saputra. 2000. Perkembangan Peserta Didik.DEPDIKBUD.
Lexy J. Moleong.2010. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remadja Rosdakarya.
Soeparwoto, et al. 2006.Psikologi perkembangan. Semarang: UPT MKK UNNES
Suharsimi Arikunto. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
Syaiful Bahri Djamarah. 2005. Guru dan Anak Didik Dalam Interaksi Edukatif Suatu Pendekatan Teoretis Psikologis. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
Tim Penyusun Pusat Bahasa. 2005. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, Edisi Ketiga. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Totok Sumaryanto. 2010. Metodologi Penelitian 2. Semarang: Universitas Negeri Semarang.
UNNES. 2013. Pedoman Penulisan Skripsi Fakultas Ilmu Keolahragaan. Semarang: UNNES Press
http://adzelgar.wordpress.com/2009/02/02/studi-dokumen-dalam-penelitian-kualitatif/
http://k-fauzi.blogspot.com/2012/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo_6.html
http://marzuki49.blogspot.com/2012/02/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo_23.html
http://www.sarjanaku.com/2013/01/pengertian-peran-definisi-menurut-para.html