Analyze of Diagnostic Assessment and Remedial Teaching Result of Mathematics Problem Solving Achievement by Problem Based Learning Model
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
This research intents on (1) testing whether the problem solving ability of learners using Problem Based Learning model by using diagnostic assessment and remedial teaching can achieve qualified score; (2) describing the process of appropriate continuation act for learners who cannot pass a test after get learning materials by Problem Based Learning model; (3) describing the result of diagnostic assessment and remedial teaching on ability achievement of problem solving in Mathematics through Problem Based Learning model. This research using mixed methods concurrent embedded. This research using test method, documentation, and interview to take data results. The results of this research showed that (1) the problem solving ability of learners by using Problem Based Learning model with diagnostic assessment and remedial teaching could achieve qualified score was more than 75%; (2) the process to follow up for learners who did not achieve good score after got learning materials by using Problem Based Learning model was carrying out of diagnostic test and remedial teaching; (3) after holding summative test, the researcher got average value 78,97. This case showed us that almost participant of research class got score better than the criteria of specified minimum score.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
References
Duskri, M., Kumaidi & Suryanto. (2014). Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik Kesulitan Belajar Matematika. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 18(1): 44-56.
Geller, L.R & Paul Yovanoff. (2009). Diagnostik Assessment in Mathematics to Support Instructional Decision Making. Practical Assesment, Research & Evaluation. 14(16): 1-11
Husamah & Setyaningrum. (2013). Desain Pembelajaran Berbasis Pencapaian Kompetensi. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka.
Izzati, Nurma. (2015). Pengaruh Penerapan Program Remedial dan Pengayaan melalui Pembelajaran Tutor Sebaya terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa. EduMa, 4(1): 54-68
Kartono. (2011). Efektivitas Penilaian Diri dan Teman Sejawat untuk Penilaian Formatif dan Sumatif pada Pembelajaran Mata Kuliah Analisis Kompleks. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika Prodi Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. Hal 49-59.
Khoiri, W., Rochmad, & Cahyono, A. N. (2013). Problem Based Learning Berbantuan Multimedia Pembelajaran Matematika untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 2(1), (1-8)
Majid, A. (2005). Perencanaan Pembelajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mardiyah. (2014). Studi Kasus Kesulitan Belajar Matematika Siswa Ditinjau dari Segi Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematika. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika Pasca Sarjana STKIP Siliwangi Bandung. Hal 308-313.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. United States of America: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2003). Programs for Initial Preparation of Mathematics Teachers. Standards for Secondary Mathematics Teachers.
Purnomo, Y. W. (2013). Keefektifan Penilaian Formatif terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Mahasiswa Ditinjau dari Motivasi Belajar. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika FMIPA. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
Putra, S.R. (2013). Desain Belajar Mengajar Kreatif Berbasis Sains. Yogyakarta: Diva Press.
Rababah, Ahmad & Alghazo, Y. (2016). Diagnostic Assessment and Mathematical Difficulties: An Experimental Study of Dyscalculia. Journal of Social Science, 4, (45-52)
Rifa’i, A. & Anni, C.T. (2016). Psikologi Pendidikan. Semarang: UPT Unnes Press.
Rosnawati, R. (2013). Asesmen Formatif Informal dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. Hal 474-478.
Setiawan, B. B. (2011). Analisis Hasil Ulangan Matematika di SMP dan Tindak Lanjutnya.Yogyakarta: Pusat Pengembangan dan Pemberdayaan Pendidik dan Tenaga Kependidikan Matematika.
Siswaningsih, W., Firman H. & Rofifah R. (2015). Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik Two Tier Berbasis Piktorial untuk Mengidentifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Materi Larutan Elekrolit dan Nonelektrolit. Jurnal Pengajar MIPA, 20(2): 144-149.
Slamet. (2015). Pembelajaran Remedial untuk Meningkatkan Ketuntasan Belajar Siswa. An-Nuha, 2(1): 98-117
Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Kombinasi. Bandung: Alfabeta Bandung.
Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta Bandung.
Sukiman. (2012). Pengembangan Sistem Evaluasi. Yogyakarta: Insan Madani.
Suwarto. (2013). Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik. Jurnal Pendidikan. 22(2): 187-202.
TIMSS. (2015). Highlights From TIMSS and TIMSS Advanced 2015. Washington. Institute of Education Sciences.
Treagust, D.F. (2006). Diagnostic assessment in science as a means to improving teaching, learning and retention. Uniserve Science Assessment Symposium Proceedings. Sydney: University of Sydney.
Tuysuz, C. (2009). Development of two-tier diagnostic instrument and assess students’ understanding in chemistry. Scientific Research and Essay, 4 (6): 626-631.
Wardhani, S. (2008). Paket Fasilitasi Pemberdayaan KKG/ MGMP Matematika. Yogyakarta: Pusat Pengembangan dan Pemberdayaan Pendidik dan Tenaga Kependidikan Matematika.
Widjayanti, D. B. (2009). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Mahasiswa Calon Guru Matematika: Apa dan Bagaimana Mengembangkannya. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika FMIPA. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta