Aksu, G., & Koruklu, N. (2015). Determination the Effects of Vocational High School Students' Logical and Critical Thinking Skills on Mathematics Success. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 59, 181-206.
Bakker, A., Smit, J., & Wegerif, R. (2015). Scaffolding and Dialogic Teaching in Mathematics Education: Introduction and Review. ZDM, 47(7), 1047-1065.
Bayuningsih, A. S., Usodo, B., & Subanti, S. (2018). Problem Based Learning with Scaffolding Technique on Geometry. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1), 2-6.
Creswell, J. W. (2016). Research Design: Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Campuran. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar.
Danielson, C. (2011). The Framework for Teaching Evaluation Instrument. Princeton: The Danielson Group.
Daryanto. (2011). Media Pembelajaran. Bandung: Satu Nusa.
Hendriana, H. Rohaeti, E. E., & Sumarmo, U. (2017). Hard Skill dan Soft Skill Matematika Siswa. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.
Karagoz, Ö., & Saka, A. Z. (2015). Development of Teacher Guidance Materials Based on 7E Learning Method in Virtual Laboratory Environment. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 810-827.
Kusaeri, K. (2019). Pedagogical Beliefs about Critical Thinking among Indonesian Mathematicspre-service Teachers. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 573-590.
Nugroho, H. (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 5e terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika. Histogram, 2(1), 45-58.
Nursyahidah, F., & Albab, I. U. (2017). Investigating Student Difficulties on Integral Calculus Based on Critical Thinking Aspects. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 211-218.
Nusantoro, E., & Kurniawan, K. (2014). Meningkatkan Tanggung Jawab Belajar Melalui Layanan Penguasaan Konten. Indonesian Journal of Guidance and Counseling: Theory and Application, 3(3), 44-50.
Oktiningrum, W. (2016). Developing PISA-" Like" Mathematics Task with Indonesia Natural and Cultural Heritage as Context to Assess Students Mathematical Literacy. Journal on Mathematics Education, 7(1), 1-10.
Parandika, R. W., Muhtarom, M., & Sutrisno, S. (2019). Analisis Karakter Disiplin dan Tanggung Jawab Siswa pada Proses Pembelajaran Matematika Kelas XI SMK Palebon Semarang. Imajiner: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 1(6), 364-372.
Paruntu, P. E., Sukestiyarno, Y. L., & Prasetyo, A. P. B. (2018). Analysis of Mathematical Communication Ability and Curiosity through Project Based Learning Models with Scaffolding. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 7(1), 26-34.
Pasani, C. F., & Damayanti, F. (2018). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Group Investigation dalam Pembelajaran Matematika untuk Membina Karakter Kreatif dan Tanggung Jawab. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 1-9.
Pasani, C. F., Kusumawati, E., & Imanisa, D. (2018). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Scramble dalam Pembelajaran Matematika untuk Membina Karakter Tanggung Jawab dan Disiplin Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 178-188.
Prayogi, A., & Widodo, A. T. (2017). Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Ditinjau dari Karakter Tanggung Jawab pada Model Brain Based Learning. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 6(1), 89-95.
Rahmawati, A., Kartono, K., & Hidayah, I. (2019). Algebraic Thinking Ability Based on Mathematics Disposition in Learning Cycle 7E Model. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 8(1), 18-24.
Rochmad, R., & Masrukan, M. (2016). Studi Kinerja Mahasiswa dalam Menganalisis Materi pada Pembelajaran Kooperatif Resiprokal. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 7(1), 47-57.
Rusdi, A. I., Kosim., & Hikmawati. (2018). Rusydi, A. I., Hikmawati, H., & Kosim, K. (2018). Pengaruh Model Learning Cycle 7E terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 13(2), 124-131.
Sahal, M., Irianti, M., & Sari, N. (2018). Penerapan Strategi Pembelajaran Scaffolding untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Peserta Didik pada Materi Momentum, Impuls dan Tumbukan Kelas X SMA N 12 Pekanbaru. JOM FKIP, 5(2), 1-10.
Simbolon, M., Surya, E., & Syahputra, E. (2017). The efforts to Improving the Mathematical Critical Thinking Student’s Ability Through Problem Solving Learning Strategy by Using Macromedia Flash. American Journal of Educational Research, 5(7), 725-731.
Syafitri, R. (2017). Meningkatkan Tanggung Jawab Belajar Melalui Strategi Giving Questions and Getting Answers pada Siswa. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan, 1(2), 57-63
- Abstract viewed - 116 times
- PDF downloaded - 156 times
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright
© Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 2021
Affiliations
Nanik Susilowati
Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Rochmad Rochmad
Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Ani Rusilowati
Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
How to Cite
Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability and Learner's Responsibility Character in Learning Cycle 7E with Scaffolding
Vol 10 No 1 (2021): June 2021
Submitted: Jan 12, 2021
Published: Jun 30, 2021
Abstract
This research aims to describe the critical thinking ability of mathematical and the character of the responsibility of learners in learning cycle 7E with scaffolding. This research is a type of research combined with concurrent embedded type. Data collection of critical thinking ability is done using the mathematical critical thinking ability test. The character data of responsibility is obtained from the results of the questionnaire of the character of responsibility. The results showed that the quality of LC7E learning with Scaffolding is (1) at the planning stage, the research instruments that had been compiled are valid, (2) at the implementation stage, had well-categorized learning results and get positive responses from learners, and (3) at the assessment stage, meet the effectiveness test. Also, learners with high responsibility characters can achieve six indicators of mathematical critical thinking ability, learners with moderate responsibility characters have varying mathematical critical thinking abilities that are capable of all six indicators of critical thinking ability and some were only capable at four indicators of mathematical critical thinking ability, while learners with low responsibility characters had not been able to achieve six indicators of mathematical critical thinking ability.