Apipah, S. & Kartono. (2017). “Analisis Kemampuan Koneksi Matematis Berdasarkan Gaya Belajar Siswa pada Model Pembelajaran Vak dengan Self Assessment. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research. 6(2): 148-156.
Damanik, W.J. (2018). “Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran untuk Menigkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Siswa Menggunakan Model Discovery Learningâ€. Jurnal Inspiratif, 4(1): 27-38.
Danielson, C. (2011). The Framework for Teaching Evaluation Instrument. Princeton: The Danielson Group.
Fasha, E. K. (2017). “Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Pendekatan Mathematics in Context pada Kemampuan dan Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatifâ€. JES-MAT. 3(1): 87–94.
Junaedi, I. & Asikin, M. (2012). “Pengembangan Pembelajaran Matematika Humanistik Untuk Meningkatkan Kemahiran Matematisâ€. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research. 1(2): 114-120.
Li, N., Cao, Y., & Mok, Ida A. C. (2016). A Framework for Teacher Verbal Feedback: Lessons from Chinese Mathematics Classrooms. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education. 12(9): 2465-2480.
Manning, C., Brooks, W., Crotteau, V., & Diedrich, A. (2011). “Tech Tools for Teachers, By Teachers: Bridging Teachers and Studentsâ€. Wisconsin English Journal, 53(1): 24–28.
Maulyda, M., Budiharjo, A., Erfan, M. & Radha, R. (2020). “Level Berpikir Metakognisi Mahasiswa Selama Perkuliahan Online Di Masa Pandemiâ€. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif. 3(6): 679-690.
Minarni, A., Napitupulu, E.E. & Husein, R. (2016). “Mathematical Understanding and Representation Ability of Public Junior High School in North Sumatraâ€. Journal on Mathematics Education. 7(1): 45-58.
Nurkhikmah. (2013). “Keefektifan Penerapan Model Problem Based Learning (PBL) Terhadap Peningkatan Kualitas Pembelajaran IPAâ€. Journal of Elementary Education, 2(2): 19-24.
Retnawati, H. (2016). Validitas Reliabilitas & Karakteristik Butir (Panduan untuk Peneliti, Mahasiswa, dan Psikometrian). Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing.
Riyanti, A.I., Ngadiman & Hamidi, N. (2019). “Pengaruh Kesadaran Metakognisi Dan Motivasi Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswaâ€. Jurnal “Tata Arta†UNS. 5(1): 17-31.
Safitri, K.H. & Saleh, M. (2015). “Analisis Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Menggunakan Metakognisiâ€. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika UMS. 470-485.
Salam, Muhammad & Misu, La. (2018). Searching of Student’s Metacognition Consciousness in Learning of Numbers Theory through Behavioral Learning Model. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 1028 012171.
Sophianingtyas, F. & Sugiarto, B. (2013). “Identifikasi Level Metakognitif Siswa Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Materi Perhitungan Kimia (Identification of Students' Metacognitive Level in Solving Stoichiometry Problem)â€. UNESA Journal of Chemical Education. 2(1): 21-27.
Sugiyono. (2016). Model Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sukestiyarno. (2013). Statistika Dasar. Yogyakarta: PT. Andi
Sukestiyarno. (2016). Olah Data Penelitian Berbantuan SPSS. Semarang: Unnes Press.
Udil, Patrisius Afrisno. (2020).†Persepsi Mahasiswa Tentang Perkuliahan Berbasis E-Learning Dengan Menggunakan Schoologyâ€. Fraktal: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika. 1(1): 79–91.
Wirawan, I Kadek. (2016). Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif TTW Untuk Meningkatkan Interaksi Sosial dan Pemahaman Konsep Fisika Siswa. Singaraja: Bali.
Yamin, Martinis & Bansu I. Ansari. (2012). Taktik Mengembangkan Kemampuan Individual Siswa. Jakarta: Referensi (GP Press Group).
Zhe, L. (2012). “Survey of Primary Students’ Mathematical Representation Status and Study on the Teaching Model of Mathematical Representationâ€. Journal of Mathematics Education. 5(1): 63-76.
Zulfa, A., Kartono & Cahyono. 2021. “Mathematical Communication Ability in Terms of Self Efficacy Through Guided Discovery Learning Assisted Immediate Feedbackâ€. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research. 10(1): 77-84.
- Abstract viewed - 108 times
- PDF downloaded - 84 times
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright
© Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 2021
Affiliations
Argi Ayu Sulistyani Kusumaningtyas
Pendidikan Matematika Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Semarang
Kartono Kartono
Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Semarang
Tri Sri Noor Asih
Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Semarang
How to Cite
The Implementation of Ttw With Mic Approach and Verbal Feedback Via Lms Toward the Mathematics Representation Based on Metacognition
Vol 10 No 1 (2021): June 2021
Submitted: Feb 24, 2021
Published: Jun 30, 2021
Abstract
Learning with a teacher-centered model had not been able to optimize students’ higher-order thinking ability. It made the students’ metacognition were not maximum especially dealing with the mathematical representation ability. This research aimed to describe the mathematics representation ability based on the metacognitive categories. This research applied a combination method of sequential explanatory with regression test for the quantitative data. The results showed the metacognition influenced mathematics representation ability. Students with reflective use categories could identify and analyze the questions properly. They could also evaluate the answers although some of them did not write the questions into correct mathematics sentences. Students with strategic use categories could identify and analyze the questions properly but they did not evaluate their answers. Students with aware use could identify but they were a lack in analyzing and evaluating. Then, students with the tacit use category were not found. Teachers should direct the students with more development and counseling in a personal manner to overcome the gaps.