Hendrasworo, Yudanto. (2009). Mengapa Bahasa Inggris Penting? [online] Article availabled at: http://ingintahu banyak.blogspot.com/2009/09/ mengapa-bahasa-inggris penting.html. [13 September 2009 – 22.15].
Ilmiyah, S. & Masriyah. 2013. Profil Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa SMP pada Materi Pecahan Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar. Tersedia di http://dokumen.tips/ documents /profil-pemecahan-masalah matematika siswa-smp-pada-materi-pecahandi tinjau.html.
Kersaint, G., Thompson, D. R., & Petkova, M. 2009. Teaching Mathematics to English Language Learners. New York: Routledge.
Kolb, A.Y. & Kolb, D. A. 2005. The Kolb Learning Style Inventory Version3.1.Online.http://www.haygroup.com/tl/Questionnaires_Workbooks/Kolb_Learning_Style_Inventory.aspx
Kolb, D.A., Boyatzis, R.E. & Mainemelis, C.2000.Experiential Learning Theory:
Previous Research and New Directions. Dalam Sternberg, R.J. & Zhang, L.S. (Eds.). Perspectives on Cognitive, Learning, and Thinking Styles. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
OECD. 2013. PISA 2012. Assesment and Analytical Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science, Problem Solving and Financial Literacy. OECD Publishing.
OECD. 2014. PISA 2012. Results in Focus: What 15-year- olds know and what they can do with what they know. OECD Publishing.
Rahman, A. 2008. “Analisis Hasil Belajar Matematika Berdasarkan Perbedaan Gaya Kognitif Secara Psikologis dan Konseptual Tempo Pada Siswa Kelas X SMA Negeri 3 Makasar”. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan. 14(2). Hal 452-473.
Ramadan. 2011. “An Investigation of The Learning Styles of Prospective Educators”. The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education, Vol.1 No.1. Hal 1-6.
Riau, B.E.S. 2016. “Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematik Siswa Kelas VII Berdasarkan Gaya Belajar Pada Pembelajaran PBL”. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, UJMER 5 (2).
Ricardo, R., Mardyana., & Retno, D. 2014. “Tingkat Kreativitas Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Divergen Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar Siswa”. Jurnal Elektronik Pembelajaran Matematika, Vol.2 No.2. Hal 141- 151.
Stacey, K. 2010. “Mathematical and Scientific Literacy Around the World”. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 33(1) Hal 1-16.
Sugiyono. 2012. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. 2016. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuatitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sukestiyarno, YL. 2012. Olah Data Penelitian Berbantuan SPSS. Semarang: Universitas Negeri Semarang.
Sukestiyarno, YL. 2013. Olah Data Penelitian Berbantuan SPSS. Semarang: Universitas Negeri Semarang.
Suyitno, H. 2007. “Pengaruh Pemikiran Wittgenstein Terhadap Matematika”. Jurnal Filsafat Vol.17, No.3.
Suyitno, H. 2008. “Hubungan Antara Bahasa Dengan Logika dan Matematika Menurut Pemikiran Wittgenstein”. Humaniora Vol.20. No.1. Hal 26-37.
Wardono and Masjaya. 2018. “Pentingnya Kemampuan Literasi Matematika untuk Menumbuhkan Kemampuan Koneksi Matematika dalam Meningkatkan SDM”. Prisma: Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika. Vol. 1 (2018).
Wardono and Scolastika mariani. 2015. “Implementasi Model PBL dengan Pendekatan Realistik Berbantuan Edmodo untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Matematika Siswa Kelas VII. Journal Pendidikan Matematika. Vol 4 No.2 (2015). ISSN 2460 – 5840.
Wardono, S.B Waluyo, S. Mariani, & Candra D. 2016. “Mathematics Literacy on Problem Based Learning with Indonesian Realistic Mathematics Education Approach Assisted E-Learning Edmodo”. Journal of Physics: Conference Series.
- Abstract viewed - 117 times
- PDF downloaded - 116 times
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright
© Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 2022
Affiliations
Ponirin Ponirin
SMP Pelita
Hardi Suyitno
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Saiful Ridlo
Universitas Negeri Semarang
How to Cite
Mathematics Literacy of Class Ix Students of Smp Pelita 1 Jakarta from Learning Style and English Ability
Vol 11 No 1 (2022): June 2022
Submitted: May 18, 2021
Published: Jun 30, 2022
Abstract
In this research to analyze differences in learning styles and English language ability on the mathematical literacy of grade IX students of SMP Pelita 1 West Jakarta. The methodology used in this research is sequential mixed methods type explanatory sequential. Data collection techniques used is Documents, Questionnaires, Tests, and Interviews. One Way Anova test is used to determine the difference in mathematical literacy between learning styles. Correlation analysis was used to determine the correlation between English language ability and mathematical literacy. The analysis to find out the differences in learning styles and English language skills on mathematical literacy was carried out by conducting a two-way analysis and deepened by data triangulation. Based on the results of the study, the subject of Assimilation group I had mathematical literacy which included the seven components of mathematical literacy. Students' understanding of learning styles and their English language ability will make it easier for students to understand the seven components of mathematical literacy.