Alhaddad, I., Kusumah, Y. S., Sabandar, J., & Dahlan, J. A. (2015). Enhancing Students’ Communication Skills Through Treffinger Teaching Model. Journal on Mathematics Education, 6(1), 31–39.
Annuuru, T. A., Johan, R. C., & Ali, M. (2017). Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi dalam Pelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam Peserta Didik Sekolah Dasar Melalui Model Pembelajaran Treffinger. Jurnal Edutcehnologia, 3(2), 136–144.
Choirudin. (2017). Efektivitas Pembelajaran Berbasis Schoology. NUMERICAL: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 52–62.
Delina, Afrilianto, M. &, & Rohaeti, E. E. (2018). Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis dan Self Confidence Siswa SMP Melalui Pendekatan Realistic Mathematic Education. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, 1(3), 281–288.
Haryanto, S. (2018). Kelebihan dan Kekurangan E-Learning Berbasis Schoology (Studi PTK dalam Pembelajaran Mata Kuliah Academic Listening). Prosiding Seminar Nasional GEOTIK, 106–110.
Hendriana, H., Rohaeti, E. E., & Sumarmo, U. (2017). Hards Skills dan Soft Skills Matematik Siswa. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Hendriana, H., Slamet, U. R., & Sumarmo, U. (2014). Mathematical Connection Ability and Self-Confidence (An experiment on Junior High School students through Contextual Teaching and learning with Mathematical Manipulative). International Journal of Education, 8(1), 1–11.
Huda, M. (2017). Model-Model Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran (VII). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Irawan, V. T., Sutadji, E., & Widiyanti. (2017). Blended Learning Based on Schoology: Effort of Improvement Learning Outcome and Practicum Chance in Vocational High School. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1–10.
Juliantari, N. P., Suharta, I. G. P., & Suarsana, I. M. (2018). Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa Kelas VII pada Materi Bilangan melalui Model Treffinger Berbantuan Masalah Open- Ended. BRILIANT: Jurnal Riset Dan Konseptual, 3(4), 425–435.
LaForce, M., Noble, E., & Blackwell, C. (2017). Problem-Based Learning (PBL) and Student Interest in STEM Careers: The Roles of Motivation and Ability Beliefs. Education Sciences, 7(92), 1–22.
NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0737-0806(98)80482-6
Niasih, Romlah, S., & Zhanty, L. S. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa SMP di Kota Cimahi pada Materi Statistika. Journal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 266–277.
Nolaputra, A. P., Wardono, & Supriyono. (2018). Analisi Kemampuan Literasi Matematika pada Pembelajaran PBL Pendekatan RME Berbantuan Schoology Siswa SMP. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 1, 18–32.
Nugraha, T. H., & Pujiastuti, H. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa Berdasarkan Perbedaan Gender. Edumatica: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 1–7.
Rahmadhani, E. (2018). Model Pembelajaran Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL): Peningkatan Disposisi Matematika dan Self-Confidence Mahasiswa Tadris Matematika. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 159–167.
Rakim, R., Wilonoyudho, S., & Widjanarko, D. (2017). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Shesil (Soft, Hard and Environment Skill Integrated Learning) pada Kecakapan Otomotif. Journal of Vocational and Career Education, 2(2), 41–49.
Rizqi, A. A., Suyitno, H., & Artikel, I. (2016). Analisis Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Ditinjau Dari Kepercayaan Diri Siswa Melalui Blended Learning. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 5(1), 17–23.
Rohman, M. F. (2017). Learning Management System SCHOOLOGY. Bojonegoro: Pustaka Intermedia.
Sicat, A. S. (2015). Enhancing College Students’ Proficiency in Business Writing Via Schoology. International Journal of Education and Research, 3(1), 159–178.
Syam, A., & Amri. (2017). Pengaruh Kepercayaan Diri (Self Confidence) Berbasis Kaderisasi IMM Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Mahasiswa (Studi Kasus di Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Muhammadiyah Parepare). Jurnal Biotek, 5(1), 87–102.
TIMSS. (2015). Highlights from TIMSS and TIMSS Advanced 2015: Mathematics and science achievement of U.S. students in grades 4 and 8 and in Advanced Courses at The End of High School in An International Context. (NCES 2017-002). National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED570893
Treffinger, D. J., Isaksen, S. G., & Dorval, K. B. (2010). Creative Problem Solving (CPS Version 6. 1 TM) A Contemporary Framework for Managing Change Creative Problem Solving (CPS)—.
Ulya, H., & Rahayu, R. (2017). Pembelajaran Treffinger Berbantuan Permainan Tradisional Congklak untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 48–55.
- Abstract viewed - 154 times
- PDF downloaded - 147 times
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright
© Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 2021
Affiliations
Haifa Nafisah
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Isnarto Isnarto
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Wardono Wardono
Universitas Negeri Semarang
How to Cite
Analysis of Mathematical Communication Ability in terms of Self Confidence in Schoology Assisted Treffinger Learning
Vol 10 No 2 (2021): December 2021
Submitted: Jun 12, 2021
Published: Dec 30, 2021
Abstract
Mathematical communication ability needs to be possessed by students because it is an essential ability recommended by NCTM. This research aims to describe students' mathematical communication ability in terms of self-confidence in Treffinger learning assisted by Schoology. This type of research is a descriptive study with a qualitative approach. The subjects in this study were students of class X AKL 2 in the 2020/2021 academic year which consisted of 12 students. The taking of research subjects in this study was determined through the purposive sampling technique. The results showed that the achievement of students' mathematical communication ability in terms of self-confidence in Schoology assisted Treffinger learning was very diverse. Mathematical communication ability in terms of self-confidence shows that students with high self-confidence can understand and master the three indicators, students with moderate self-confidence do not master one indicator, while students with low self-confidence have not yet understood and mastered the three indicators.