Darojat, Latifah., & Kartono. 2016. “Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Open Ended Berdasarkan Aq Dengan Learning Cycle 7E.” Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research 5(1): 1–8.
Febriyanti, Dyara Atmy., & Ain, S. Q. 2021. “Pengembangan Modul Matematika Berbasis Etnomatematika Pada Materi Bangun Datar Di Sekolah Dasar.” Jurnal Basicedu 5(3): 1683–88.
Hidayat, Wahyu., & Sariningsih, R. 2018. “Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Dan Adversity Quotient Siswa SMP Melalui Pembelajaran Open Ended.” JUrnal JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika 2(1): 109–18.
Junaedi, I., & Asikin, M. 2012. “Pengembangan Pembelajaran Matematika Humanistik Untuk Meningkatkan Kemahiran Matematis.” Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research 1(2).
Kemendikbud. 2013. Materi Pelatihan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
Kharisudin, I., & Cahyati, N. E. 2020. “Problem-Solving Ability Using Mathematical Modeling Strategy on Model Eliciting Activities Based on Mathematics Self-Concept.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1567(3).
Khumairoh, Binta., Amin, S. M., & Wijayanti, P. 2020. “Penalaran Proporsional Siswa Kelas Menengah Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau Dari Adversity Quotient.” Pedagogia: Jurnal Pendidikan 9(1): 67–80.
Kostopoulos, D., & Lee, J. 2012. “A Naturalistic Study of Executive Function and Mathematical Problem Solving.” Journal of Mathematical Behavior 31(2): 196–208.
Lee, Chien I. 2017. “An Appropriate Prompts System Based on the Polya Method for Mathematical Problem-Solving.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 13(7): 3621–39.
Muna, Istifadatul., & Mubarokah, L. 2014. “Proses Berpikir Siswa Climber Dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Pada Sekolah Menengah Atas.” Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika STKIP PGRI Sidoarjo 2(2): 143–50.
Prabawa, E. A., & Zaenuri. 2017. “Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Siswa Pada Model Project Based Learning Bernuansa Etnomatematika.” Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research 6(1): 120–29.
Rinawati, Sulis., Waluya, B., & Hartono. 2019. “The Analysis of Student’s Problem-Solving Difficulty Viewed from Adversity Quotient on Means-Ends Analysis Learning.” 8(2): 165–72.
Rosita, Dian., & Rochmad. 2016. “Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Pemecahan Masalah Ditinjau Dari Adversity Quotient Pada Pembelajaran Creative Problem Solving.” Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research (UJMER) 5(2): 106–13.
Sakrani. 2014. “Peningkatan Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Dan Adversity Quotient Siswa SMP Melalui Pendidikan Matematika Realistik.” UPI Bandung.
Sugiarti, Rini., Nurlaili, A., & Febriani, U. F. 2020. “Pengaruh Adversity Quotient Terhadap Motivasi Berprestasi Pada Siswa Cerdas Istimewa.” PHILANTHROPY: Journal of Psychology 4(1): 82.
Sugiyono. 2016. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sunandar, M. A., Zaenuri., & Dwidayati, N K. 2018. “Mathematical Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability of Vocational School Students on Problem Based Learning Model Nuanced Ethnomatematics Reviewed from Adversity Quotient.” Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research 7(1): 1–8.
Utami, N. W., Sayuti, S. A., & Jailani. 2021. “Indigenous Artifacts from Remote Areas, Used to Design a Lesson Plan for Preservice Math Teachers Regarding Sustainable Education.” Heliyon 7(3): 1–9.
Yani, Muhammad., Ikhsan, M., & Marwan. 2016. “Proses Berpikir Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Berdasarkan Langkah-Langkah Polya.” Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika 10(1): 43–58.
Zaenuri., & Dwidayati, NK. 2018. “Menggali Etnomatematika: Matematika Sebagai Produk Budaya.” In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 471–76.
- Abstract viewed - 170 times
- PDF downloaded - 191 times
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright
© Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 2022
Affiliations
Petronela Ivoni Susanty
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Zaenuri Zaenuri
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Iqbal Kharisudin
Universitas Negeri Semarang
How to Cite
Problem Solving Ability Judging from Adversity Quotient on Problem Based Learning Model Assisted by Ethnomathematics Module
Vol 11 No 1 (2022): June 2022
Submitted: Sep 3, 2021
Published: Jun 30, 2022
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to characterize students' problem-solving skills based on the adversity quotient in the PBL model learning supported by the ethnomathematics module. This form of research is an explanatory sequential model with mixed methods. The participants in this study were eighth graders from SMP Negeri 1 Nita during the 2020/21 academic year. The experimental class employs a problem-based learning model with an ethnomathematics module, while the control class employs a problem-based learning model alone. Before beginning the study, students in the experimental class were given a questionnaire to establish their adversity quotient category: quitter, camper, or climber. Two students were chosen for qualitative analysis of each category. Results from problem-solving aptitude tests, interviews, questionnaires, and documentation were used to collect data. The average completeness test, classical completeness test, average difference test, different percentage test, and influence test were used to analyze quantitative data. The results of the study reveal that the adversity quotient of pupils influences their problem-solving skills. The ability of research volunteers from each adversity quotient category to solve problems differs. Q1 subjects achieved two problem-solving indicators, while Q2 subjects achieved three problem-solving indicators. CA1 subjects attained three problem-solving indicators, while CA2 subjects attained four problem-solving indicators. Subjects CL1 and CL2 obtained four problem-solving indications in the climber category.